Table 3.
Characteristics | Predominant RPV N = 123 (67%)a,b,c | Predominant LPV N = 61 (33%)a,b,c | p-valued |
---|---|---|---|
Distribution of CRLM | |||
Bilateral | 67 (54) | 33 (54) | |
Right unilateral | 43 (35) | 18 (30) | |
Left unilateral | 13 (11) | 10 (16) | |
Number of segments involved (right liver) | 2 (1–3) | 2 (1–3) | 0.60 |
Number of segments involved (left liver) | 1 (0–2) | 1 (0–2) | 0.70 |
Total number of CRLM | 3 (1–8) | 4 (1–5) | 0.70 |
Number of CRLM in the right liver | 2 (1–5) | 2 (1–4) | 0.40 |
Number of CRLM in the left liver | 1 (0–3) | 1 (0–2) | 0.60 |
Ratio number of CRLM right/left liver | 1 (1.0–3.0) | 1 (1.0–2.0) | 0.70 |
Ratio number of CRLM per segment (right liver) | 1 (1.0–2.0) | 1 (1.0–2.0) | 0.60 |
Ratio number of CRLM per segment (left liver) | 1 (1.0–1.8) | 1 (1.0–2.0) | > 0.90 |
= n (%), median (interquartile range, IQR);
= primitive branch of the portal vein presenting the largest cross-sectional area;
= Sixteen patients presented an identical RPV and LPV diameter and were excluded;
= Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon rank sum test