Abstract
Methionine is an essential amino acid critical for cell growth and survival. Preclinical evidence suggests a methionine restricted diet (MRD) sensitizes cancer to radiation therapy (RT), without significant adverse effects. However, this has never been evaluated in humans. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of concurrent MRD with standard-of-care definitive RT in adults with any non-skin cancer malignancy. The MRD extended from 2 wk before RT initiation, through 2 wk beyond RT completion. The primary endpoint of safety was assessed as rate of grade 3 or higher acute and late toxicities. Feasibility was assessed with quantitative plasma amino acid panel every 2 wk during the MRD (target plasma methionine 13 μM). Nine patients were accrued over a two-year period, with five able to complete the treatment course. The trial was closed due to slow accrual and subjects’ difficulty maintaining the diet. No grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed. Subjects’ average methionine level was 18.8 μM during treatment, with average nadir 16.8 μM. These findings suggest the safety of concurrent MRD with RT, with toxicities comparable to those expected with RT alone. However, the diet was challenging, and unacceptable to most patients.
Introduction
Chemotherapy is commonly used as a radiosensitizer to improve the efficacy of definitive radiation therapy (RT), though at the expense of increased toxicity (1). Therefore, development of alternative approaches to radiosensitization that improve the therapeutic ratio is of great interest. One of the hallmarks of cancer is the uncontrolled growth and spread of cells (2). For rapid and continuous proliferation to occur, synthesis of new molecules, including DNA and proteins, is necessary. Protein synthesis in humans requires the amino acid methionine to initiate translation, as well as to serve as a building block during polypeptide synthesis. Methionine is also used in DNA methylation, affecting gene expression, as well as the synthesis of glutathione, a free radical scavenger (Figure 1) (3, 4). Despite its critical roles, internal methionine synthesis is limited, and therefore must be supplementarily acquired via diet (4).
Figure 1.

Biochemical cycle of methionine (from Epner et al. (17)).
Normal cells are able to tolerate a methionine deficient environment; however, during tumorigenesis, most cells become methionine auxotrophs, reliant on dietary intake of methionine for growth and survival, which is known as the Hoffman effect (5). This reliance may potentially be exploited clinically for better treatment outcomes. By limiting dietary methionine intake, protein synthesis is slowed due to a decreased ability to initiate translation, leading to slowed cell cycle progression. This makes cancer cells especially vulnerable because of their higher proliferative rates compared to normal cells. Additionally, the resulting decreased glutathione levels lead to an increased oxidative environment, which can lead to cell cycle arrest and cell death (6–8). Multiple preclinical studies have demonstrated that methionine restriction diets (MRDs) may enhance chemotherapy treatment (9, 10). Recently, there have also been preclinical studies demonstrating radiosensitization through methionine modulation (11, 12). Overconsumption of dietary methionine, as is common in the Western diet, has also been associated with higher radiation toxicity in mice (13).
In theory, a temporary dietary modification may be appealing to patients if it enables avoidance of cytotoxic chemotherapy as a radiosensitizer, however, the combination of the MRD and radiation therapy has not been previously evaluated in human subjects. Therefore, this Phase I trial was conducted to evaluate whether a MRD/radiation combination therapy is feasible and safe in patients receiving curative-intent radiation therapy for their malignancy (clinical trial ID # NCT03574194).
Materials and Methods
Patient Criteria
Adult patients were screened for participation if they had non-skin malignancy to be treated with curative intent definitive or adjuvant RT alone (without concurrent chemotherapy), and an RT course duration of 2–6 wk. There were no restrictions based on the body site treated, or whether treatment involved 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Standard of care dose-volume constraints were used for radiation treatment planning. Other inclusion criteria included Zubrod performance status of 0–2; adequate bone marrow and organ function; negative plasma or urine pregnancy test within 72 h of registration for women of child-bearing age; and ability to give consent for trial participation.
Exclusion criteria included the following: prior radiation therapy which would overlap with current radiation fields; unintentional weight loss of greater than 10% body weight in the past six months; use of an appetite stimulant as treatment for weight loss within the previous six months; cytotoxic chemotherapy within four weeks prior to beginning treatment; planned local therapy or cytotoxic chemotherapy within four weeks of treatment completion; active pericardial, pulmonary, or systemic infection; psychiatric or social difficulties that would result in difficulty complying with study requirements; pregnant or lactating women; and soy allergy, due to the methionine-free medical food supplements containing soy products.
Methionine Restricted Diet
Personalized meal plans were developed in conjunction with a clinical dietician to meet a goal of 5–10 mg/kg body weight/day methionine consumption, while maintaining adequate protein and caloric intake. The diet consisted of low-protein cereals, grains, and breads; fruits; vegetables; margarines and oils; and simple carbohydrates. Patients were advised to avoid foods with high methionine content, such as meats, fish, and most cheeses. The diet is similar to a vegan diet, with some additional restrictions on intake of specific nuts/legumes that are high in methionine content. A commercially available methionine-free protein supplement (HC Cooler 15, HCU Express 15, or HCU Express 20 [Vitaflo]) was also provided to patients free of charge, in an unlimited supply, to minimize weight loss and hunger. Examples of food containing low, medium, and high amounts of methionine per serving is given in Table 1. The target methionine plasma level was 13 μM, based on prior clinic data from Durando et al (14). Subjects kept a log of their dietary intake, and reviewed it every 2 wk with the clinical dietician to promote adherence to the diet. Subjects were also offered a $100 food voucher to compensate for any additional food costs that may have been involved in adhering to the experimental diet.
Table 1.
Examples of foods with varying methionine content.
| Low (up to 75 mg/serving) | Medium (76–205 mg/serving) | High (>206 mg/serving) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Asparagus- 1 cup | Corn- 1 cup | Beef |
| Broccoli- 1 cup | Peas- 1 cup | Chicken |
| Carrots- 1 cup | Spinach- 1 cup | Ham |
| Cauliflower- 1 cup | Tofu, Medium Firm- ½ cup | Turkey |
| Kale- 1 cup | Mung Beans- 1 cup | Fish |
| Mushrooms- 1 cup | Refried Beans- 1 cup | Shellfish |
| onions- 1 cup | Soy Burgers- 1 patty | Yogurt |
| Sweet Potato- 1 cup | Peanuts, Dry Roasted- 1 oz | Cheese- Cheddar, Cottage, etc. |
| Pumpkin- 1 cup | Pistachios- 1 oz | Brazil Nuts |
| Bananas- 1 cup | Cashews- 1 oz | Mixed Nuts |
| Grapes- 1 cup | Eggs-large | |
| Peaches- 1 cup | Whole Milk- 1 cup | |
| Plums- 1 cup | Brie, Gouda Cheeses- 1 oz | |
| oranges- 1 cup | Pumpkin Seeds- 1 oz | |
| Cantaloupe- 1 cup | Sunflower Seeds- 1 oz | |
| Soy Milk, Fortified- 1 cup | Wheat Pasta- 1 cup | |
| Saltine or Ritz Crackers- 8 crackers | White Rice- 1 cup | |
| Barley- 1 cup | Quinoa- 1 cup | |
| Almonds- 1 oz | Brown Rice- 1 cup | |
| Pecans- 1 oz | ||
Treatment and Analysis
The experimental design is illustrated in Figure 2. The MRD was initiated two weeks before beginning RT, since the majority of the decrease in plasma methionine concentration takes place in this time period (15). The MRD extended through two weeks beyond completion of RT. The primary objective was to determine the safety of the combination therapy, using a primary endpoint of the rate of grade 3 or higher acute and late toxicities per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0, over 12 months follow-up. During the follow-up period, patients underwent history and physical exam, with directed imaging or laboratory workup as indicated per standard of care for their cancer type, every 3 months. The secondary objective of feasibility was assessed using a dietary log of food intake, and with a quantitative plasma amino acid panel during the MRD at 2–3week intervals after initiation. Exploratory endpoints included local control and disease-free survival, as assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria. The target accrual was 15 subjects. Descriptive statistics are reported. The protocol was reviewed and approved by the West Virginia University Institutional Review Board (approval number 1803047835), and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03574194).
Figure 2.

Experimental design.
Results
Over two years, 53 patients were offered enrollment, and 9 subjects enrolled; 5 successfully completed the MRD and RT, while 4 withdrew during the induction phase of the MRD prior to starting RT. The trial was closed early due to slow accrual and subjects’ difficulty maintaining the diet. Table 2 summarizes subjects’ characteristics and outcomes. All subjects completed the 12-month follow-up period, over which time there were no grade 3 or higher adverse events attributable to the MRD, and no episodes of disease recurrence. Methionine plasma levels varied over the course of treatment, and while no subject achieved the target of 13 μM, two nadired at 14 μM. The average nadir for all 5 subjects was 16.8 μM methionine, and their average methionine level while on treatment was 18.8 μM.
Table 2.
Patient characteristics and outcomes.
| Subject | Age | Sex | RT Technique and Site Treated | Total RT Dose (Gy) | Dose/Fraction (Gy) | Methionine Nadir (μM) and (Mean Level on Treatment) | Toxicities (Grade) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| 1 | 82 | Male | SBRT to Stage I lung cancer | 54 | 18 | 19 (28) | Pneumonitis (G1) |
| 2 | 67 | Female | SBRT to Stage I lung cancer | 55 | 11 | 19 (23) | Dyspepsia (G1) Fatigue (G2) |
| 3 | 67 | Female | SBRT to 2 oligometastatic lung nodules | 39 | 13 | 14 (16) | Wheezing (G1) |
| 4 | 53 | Female | IMRT to pelvic and para-aortic nodes from recurrent endometrial cancer | 45/60 | 1.8/2.4 (integrated boost) | 18 (23) | Diarrhea (G2) Weight Loss (G2) |
| 5 | 65 | Male | IMRT to pelvic nodes and post-prostatectomy tumor bed | 45/66.6 | 1.8 (sequential boost) | 14 (19) | None |
Discussion
Preclinical evidence suggests that restricting dietary methionine intake has the potential to improve clinical outcomes in patients with cancer. However, prior clinical trials utilizing a methionine restricted diet for up to 39 wk, either alone or in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy, have shown poor feasibility due to failure to meet patients’ energy needs, resulting in side effects such as weight loss, leukopenia, and neutropenia (14–16). Our pilot study combined RT with a potentially radiosensitizing MRD for the first time in humans, with the premise that utilizing the experimental diet for a relatively short duration may be more feasible for patients to complete. The findings suggest that the MRD was safe with thoracic or abdominopelvic RT, with toxicities comparable to those expected with RT alone. However, the diet was not desirable for most patients who were offered the trial and refused, and was not acceptable for most of the patients enrolled, who either withdrew from participation, or had difficulties adhering to the diet enough to reduce their plasma methionine levels to the target. These limitations led to a small patient pool for analysis.
Our findings demonstrate the challenges of major dietary changes, even for a short period of time, which was perhaps made more challenging due to the concomitant effects of radiation. The geographic location at which the trial was conducted (West Virginia) may have also contributed, as enrollment may have been improved in a region with a higher prevalence of patients who naturally follow a vegetarian or vegan diet. If methionine restriction is to be utilized as a radiosensitizer in the future, methods to facilitate compliance will be critical to successful implementation. This may be potentially accomplished by making the methionine-free food supplement more palatable to patients (17), or creating a diet kit for patients that would provide all of their nutritional intake for the duration of their treatment course. Current National Cancer Institute dietary guidelines for patients with cancer recommend high protein and calories for improved healing, decreased infection, and to mitigate side effects such as anorexia and taste changes, so a diet kit centered around methionine restriction would need to have a suitable substitute for high protein foods like meats and eggs (18). Several novel approaches are also under investigation for treatment of inborn cystathionine beta-synthase-deficient homocystinuria, for which a MRD is effective but is similarly poorly adhered to (19). For example, one such approach allows patients to consume a more normal diet, with prescription of an oral pharmaceutical designed to deplete plasma methionine levels (20, 21).
Conclusion
While the number of participants who successfully completed the trial limits the strength of possible conclusions, this study suggests the safety of a combination use of MRD and radiation therapy. Further developments in feasible implementation of a MRD may support future clinical trials evaluating its radiosensitizing potential.
Acknowledgments
Vitaflo (International) Limited provided the dietary supplement used in this trial free of charge. Mary Anne Yanosik provided clinical dietician support for the trial.
Funding
This trial was funded by American Cancer Society Institutional Research Grant (ACS-IRG) Pilot Project Grant 16–143-07-IRG. IK was supported, in part, by National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) grants # P20GM109096 and P20GM109005
Footnotes
Disclosure Statement
The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.
Data Availability Statement
Research data are stored in an institutional repository and will be shared upon request to the corresponding author.
References
- 1.Wardman P Chemical radiosensitizers for use in radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2007; Aug 19(6):397–417. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2007.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cavuoto P, Fenech MF. A review of methionine dependency and the role of methionine restriction in cancer growth control and life-span extension. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012;38(6):726–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Parkhitko AA, Jouandin P, Mohr SE, Perrimon N. Methionine metabolism and methyltransferases in the regulation of aging and lifespan extension across species. Aging Cell. 2019;18(6):e13034. doi: 10.1111/acel.13034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chello PL, Bertino JR. Effect of methionine deprivation on L5178Y murine leukemia cells in culture interference with the antineoplastic effect of methotrexate. Biochem Pharmacol. 1976;25(8):889–92. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(76)90309-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Okuno T, Honda E, Arakawa T, Ogino H, Ueno H. Glutathione-dependent cell cycle G1 arrest and apoptosis induction in human lung cancer A549 cells caused by methylseleninic acid: comparison with sodium selenite. Biol Pharm Bull. 2014;37(11):1831–7. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b14-00453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Markovic J, Mora NJ, Broseta AM, Gimeno A, de-la-Concepción N, Viña J, Pallardó FV. The depletion of nuclear glutathione impairs cell proliferation in 3t3 fibroblasts. PLoS One. 2009;4(7):e6413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pallardó FV, Markovic J, García JL, Viña J. Role of nuclear glutathione as a key regulator of cell proliferation. Mol Aspects Med. 2009;30(1–2):77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2009.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gao X, Sanderson SM, Dai Z, Reid MA, Cooper DE, Lu M, Richie JP, Ciccarella A, Calcagnotto A, Mikhael PG, et al. Dietary methionine influences therapy in mouse cancer models and alters human metabolism. Nature. 2019;572(7769):397–401. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1437-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liu C, Wang J-L, Wu D-Z, Yuan Y-W, Xin L. Methionine restriction enhances the chemotherapeutic sensitivity of colorectal cancer stem cells by miR-320d/c-Myc axis. Mol Cell Biochem. 2022;477(7):2001–13. doi: 10.1007/s11010-022-04416-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Miousse IR, Kutanzi KR, Koturbash I. Effects of ionizing radiation on DNA methylation: from experimental biology to clinical applications. Int J Radiat Biol. 2017;93(5):457–69. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2017.1287454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Miousse IR, Tobacyk J, Melnyk S, James SJ, Cheema AK, Boerma M, Hauer-Jensen M, Koturbash I. One-carbon metabolism and ionizing radiation: a multifaceted interaction. Biomol Concepts. 2017;8(2):83–92. doi: 10.1515/bmc-2017-0003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ewing LE, Skinner CM, Pathak R, Yee EU, Krager K, Gurley PC, Melnyk S, Boerma M, Hauer-Jensen M, Koturbash I, et al. Dietary methionine supplementation exacerbates gastrointestinal toxicity in a mouse model of abdominal irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021;109(2):581–93. Feb 1 doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.09.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Durando X, Thivat E, Farges M-C, Cellarier E, D’Incan M, Demidem A, Vasson M-P, Barthomeuf C, Chollet P. Optimal methionine-free diet duration for nitrourea treatment: a phase I clinical trial. Nutr Cancer. 2008;60(1):23–30. doi: 10.1080/01635580701525877 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Epner DE, Morrow S, Wilcox M, Houghton JL. Nutrient intake and nutritional indexes in adults with metastatic cancer on a phase I clinical trial of dietary methionine restriction. Nutr Cancer. 2002;42(2):158–66. doi: 10.1207/S15327914NC422_2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Thivat E, et al. A methionine-free diet associated with nitrosourea treatment down-regulates methylguanine-DNA methyl transferase activity in patients with metastatic cancer. Anticancer Res. 2007;27(4C):2779–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fang H, Stone KP, Forney LA, Sims LC, Gutierrez GC, Ghosh S, Gettys TW. Implementation of dietary methionine restriction using casein after selective, oxidative deletion of methionine. iScience. 2021; Apr 2424(5):102470. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Supportive PDQ, Palliative Care Editorial B. Nutrition in cancer care (PDQ®): patient version., in PDQ Cancer Information Summaries. 2002. National Cancer Institute (US): Bethesda (MD). [Google Scholar]
- 19.Majtan T, Kožich V, Kruger WD. Recent therapeutic approaches to cystathionine beta-synthase-deficient homocystinuria. Br J Pharmacol. 2023; Feb 180(3):264–78. doi: 10.1111/bph.15991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hoffman RM. Development of recombinant methioninase to target the general cancer-specific metabolic defect of methionine dependence: a 40-year odyssey. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2015; Jan 15(1):21–31. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2015.963050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Perreault M, Means J, Gerson E, James M, Cotton S, Bergeron CG, Simon M, Carlin DA, Schmidt N, Moore TC, et al. The live biotherapeutic SYNB1353 decreases plasma methionine via directed degradation in animal models and healthy volunteers. Cell Host Microbe. 2024; Mar 1332(3):382–95.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2024.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Research data are stored in an institutional repository and will be shared upon request to the corresponding author.
