Table 5.
Work Impact Outcome | Duty-Related Technical Proficiency |
Mission Effectiveness |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | Impact Group Post Hoc Comparison |
F | Impact Group Post Hoc Comparison |
|||||
Negative M (SD) | Neutral M (SD) | Positive M (SD) | Negative M (SD) | Neutral M (SD) | Positive M (SD) | |||
Exhaustion | 11.2* | 14.2 (8.7)a | 12.2 (8.6)b | 11.4 (7.8)b | 15.9* | 14.2 (8.4)a | 11.2 (8.6)b | 11.7 (7.9)b |
Cynicism | 23.8* | 13.0 (8.7)a | 10.0 (8.3)b | 9.1 (7.6)b | 8.2* | 11.9 (8.5)a | 10.0 (8.1)b | 9.5 (7.5)b |
Professional efficacy | 24.5* | 23.7 (7.9)b | 26.7 (7.2)a | 26.8 (6.4)a | 10.1* | 24.8 (7.5)b | 26.8 (7.1)a | 26.9 (6.4)a |
Psychological distress | 17.4* | 44.5 (22.5)a | 37.1 (23.0)b | 36.1 (20.1)b | 25.1* | 44.3 (23.0)a | 34.4 (21.4)b | 35.3 (21.0)b |
Role Overload | 5.1* | 3.8 (1.4)a | 3.5 (1.4)b | 3.4 (1.4)b | 26.6* | 3.9 (1.4)a | 3.2 (1.4)b | 3.5 (1.4)b |
Role Conflict | 7.7* | 3.9 (1.4)a | 3.6 (1.4)b | 3.5 (1.5)b | 16.2* | 3.9 (1.3)a | 3.4 (1.4)b | 3.4 (1.4)b |
Role Ambiguity | 32.0* | 3.7 (1.3)a | 3.1 (1.3)b | 3.0 (1.3)b | 16.8* | 3.5 (1.3)a | 3.1 (1.2)b | 3.1 (1.3)b |
Note: ANOVA = analysis of variance.
a,bIndicate group means that are significantly different.
*p < .01. df = (2, 1042–1295).