Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 4;11:1418052. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1418052

Table 5.

Overview of ventilation defects (VD) distribution for different quadrants, methods, and registration algorithms.

ANTs
CT JVent RVent* Omnibus ANTS CT vs. JVent CT vs. RVent* JVent vs. RVent*
UR 0.23 (0.02–0.50) 0.54 (0.23–0.89) 0.14 (0.01–0.41) 4.47e−27 (****) 1.87e−12 (****) 9.53e−05 (****) 2.98e−22 (****)
UL 0.14 (0.02–0.44) 0.60 (0.20–0.96) 0.13 (0.01–0.35) 5.44e−28 (****) 3.36e−16 (****) 1.28e−02 (*) 1.72e−23 (****)
LR 0.42 (0.11–0.65) 0.16 (0.04–0.36) 0.38 (0.12–0.60) 9.86e−13 (****) 6.50e−12 (****) 2.85e−01 (n.s.) 1.52e−15 (****)
LL 0.37 (0.08–0.56) 0.10 (0.02–0.32) 0.42 (0.12–0.60) 1.15e−15 (****) 1.45e−11 (****) 2.58e−01 (n.s.) 2.37e−17 (****)
Omnibus quadrants 3.28e−13 (****) 3.86e−45 (****) 7.27e−22 (****)
UR vs. LR 1.51e−05 (****) 6.92e−22 (****) 3.12e−11 (****)
UL vs. LL 6.77e−08 (****) 1.98e−23 (****) 6.87e−14 (****)
F-REG
CT JVent RVent* Omnibus F-REG CT vs. JVent CT vs. RVent* JVent vs. RVent*
UR 0.23 (0.02–0.50) 0.47 (0.30–0.81) 0.20 (0.08–0.43) 1.04e−23 (****) 4.13e−14 (****) 5.88e−02 (n.s.) 1.66e−23 (****)
UL 0.14 (0.02–0.44) 0.58 (0.37–0.79) 0.20 (0.07–0.35) 6.99e−33 (****) 7.15e−18 (****) 6.89e−01 (n.s.) 2.65e−25 (****)
LR 0.42 (0.11–0.65) 0.27 (0.17–0.39) 0.44 (0.19–0.66) 5.66e−06 (****) 5.87e−05 (****) 2.64e−01 (n.s.) 1.14e−09 (****)
LL 0.37 (0.08–0.56) 0.25 (0.15–0.39) 0.46 (0.21–0.66) 2.23e−07 (****) 8.82e−03 (**) 3.78e−04 (***) 3.09e−12 (****)
Omnibus quadrants 3.28e−13 (****) 6.39e−29 (****) 2.49e−17 (****)
UR vs. LR 1.51e−05 (****) 3.61e−17 (****) 1.22e−10 (****)
UL vs. LL 6.77e−08 (****) 1.42e−19 (****) 3.30e−14 (****)
M-REG
CT JVent RVent* Omnibus M-REG CT vs. JVent CT vs. RVent* JVent vs. RVent*
UR 0.23 (0.02–0.50) 0.75 (0.70–0.77) 0.65 (0.59–0.74) 1.16e−35 (****) 4.91e−24 (****) 6.57e−22 (****) 2.65e−19 (****)
UL 0.14 (0.02–0.44) 0.77 (0.72–0.80) 0.68 (0.60–0.75) 3.71e−38 (****) 1.01e−24 (****) 2.84e−23 (****) 6.14e−17 (****)
LR 0.42 (0.11–0.65) 0.70 (0.66–0.75) 0.71 (0.63–0.78) 2.50e−21 (****) 3.78e−19 (****) 5.68e−20 (****) 3.60e−01 (n.s.)
LL 0.37 (0.08–0.56) 0.73 (0.68–0.78) 0.73 (0.64–0.81) 6.11e−27 (****) 7.76e−21 (****) 1.04e−22 (****) 9.17e−01 (n.s.)
Omnibus quadrants 3.28e−13 (****) 2.99e−10 (****) 7.98e−03 (**)
UR vs. LR 1.51e−05 (****) 6.40e−06 (****) 1.91e−02 (*)
UL vs. LL 6.77e−08 (****) 5.66e−05 (****) 1.76e−03 (**)

Significantly higher VDJVent were present in the upper lung regions in comparison to the lower regions for ANTs and for F-REG. RVent showed a reversed relationship for ANTs and F-REG similar to CT. Respective omnibus and post-hoc test results for differences regarding quadrants (omnibus quadrants) and parameters (omnibus registration abbreviation) are included as well. p ≤ 0.05 (*), p ≤ 0.01 (**), p ≤ 0.001 (***), p ≤ 0.0001 (****). Please note that the numbers displayed in this table are rounded to two decimal places. As a result, different values may appear identical despite minor differences in their actual values. ANTs: advanced normalization tools, F-Reg: Forsberg registration, M-Reg: Matlab registration, RVent*: filtered regional ventilation, JVent: Jacobian determinant ventilation, UR: upper right, UL: upper left, LR: lower right, LL: lower left, VD: ventilation defect.