Table 2.
Cultural humility training broadly, cultural knowledge training, and cultural skills training: Differences in perception by participants’ position in program
| Items | Total M (SD) or % “Yes” |
Graduate Students M (SD) or % “Yes” |
Faculty, Supervisors, and/or Directors of Clinical Training M (SD) or % “Yes” |
ANOVA or Chi-Square Test (χ2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CULTURAL HUMILITY TRAINING BROADLY | ||||
|
| ||||
| Cultural Humility Training Activities | ||||
|
| ||||
| As part of clinical training, my program offers the following cultural humility trainingsa (n=229): | ||||
|
| ||||
| Multiculturalism orientation | 51.50% | 47.62% | 68.18% | χ2 = 6.51, p < .05 |
|
| ||||
| Cultural plunge/Cultural immersion | 10.85% | 10.92% | 10.53% | χ2 = 0.01, p = 0.94 |
|
| ||||
| Multicultural case conference | 30.77% | 26.46% | 48.89% | χ2 = 9.27, p <.001 |
|
| ||||
| Didactics or workshops on cultural humility | 50.45% | 45.00% | 83.87% | χ2 = 14.31, p <.001 |
|
| ||||
| Perception of Cultural Humility Training | ||||
|
| ||||
| My program provides graduate students with up-to-date and empirically based training in cultural humility.b (n=209) | 3.29 (1.57) | 3.19 (1.55) | 4.41 (1.37) | F(1,207)=10.00 p <.01 |
|
| ||||
| CULTURAL KNOWLEDGE TRAINING | ||||
|
| ||||
| Coursework | ||||
|
| ||||
| Diversity issues are infused throughout graduate courses rather than being isolated to a single lecture or course. b (n = 294) | 3.72 (1.52) | 3.39 (1.56) | 4.44 (1.17) | F(1,292)=37.8, p <.001 |
| Does your program offer at least one graduate course focused on racial and social justice issues as they relate to clinical practice and clinical science? a (n = 300) | 76.00% | 70.80% | 86.70% | χ2 = 7.36, p <.05 |
|
| ||||
| CULTURAL SELF-AWARENESS TRAINING | ||||
|
| ||||
| Clinical Supervisor Discussion of Cultural Identities | ||||
|
| ||||
| Clinical supervisors regularly discuss trainee cultural identities during supervision.b (n=195) | 3.07 (1.58) | 2.80 (1.50) | 4.44 (1.27) | F(1,193)=34.92, p <.001 |
| Clinical supervisors regularly discuss client cultural identities during supervision.b (n=196) | 4.22 (1.50) | 4.05 (1.53) | 5.06 (0.98) | F(1,194)=13.42 p <.001 |
|
| ||||
| Reflective Training Exercises | ||||
|
| ||||
| Cultural genogram exercise a (n=229) | 21.40% | 16.93% | 42.50% | χ2 = 10.55, p <.001 |
Note. M = Mean. SD = standard deviation.
a
Responses were coded as yes versus no.
b
Responses ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree).