Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 5;15:1432799. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1432799

Table 5.

Comparison of automated vs. manual CAR T-Cell manufacturing techniques.

Feature Automated Closed Systems Manual Processing Methods
Scalability High scalability due to standardized processes. Can handle larger batches and multiple productions simultaneously. Limited scalability. Labor-intensive and harder to scale up due to reliance on skilled technicians.
Reproducibility High reproducibility with less variability between batches due to controlled, consistent processes. Lower reproducibility with potential for greater variability due to human involvement in processing steps.
Cost-effectiveness Potentially more cost-effective in the long run due to reduced labor costs and increased throughput. High initial investment in equipment and setup. Less cost-effective for large-scale production due to higher labor costs and longer processing times. Lower initial investment.
Quality of CAR T Cells Consistent quality with automated monitoring and standardized protocols. Minimizes human error and maintains strict environmental and process controls. Quality can vary; highly dependent on the skill and consistency of the personnel involved. More susceptible to human error.