Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 5;11:1452142. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1452142

TABLE 6.

Comparison with previous state-of-the-art methods.

Method Subcellular Localization S p (%) S n (%) MCC ACC (%)
iLoc-lncRNA
2.0
Nucleus 95.59 91.03 86.59 91.60
Cytoplasm 98.96 94.37 94.59
Ribosome 99.01 83.72 85.71
Exosome 99.36 66.67 83.33
lncLocation Nucleus 74.19 95.83 87.78
Cytoplasm 100 85.00
Ribosome 55.56 100
Exosome 33.33 100
LncSTPred in Lin’s dataset Nucleus 78.74 90.06 60.48 90.76
Cytoplasm 95.20 75.12 67.06
Ribosome 99.84 97.67 97.53
Exosome 99.84 96.67 92.90
LightGBM-LNCLOC Nucleus 90.00 42.90 70.60
Cytoplasm 40.00 66.67
Cytosol 50.00 100
Ribosome 40.00 40.00
Exosome 42.90 100
LncSTPred in Li’s dataset Nucleus 81.25 81.29 61.39 87.68
Cytoplasm 87.82 60.49 50.92
Cytosol 93.58 53.62 45.31
Ribosome 94.51 47.69 43.03
Exosome 99.83 6.25 75.43