Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 19;19(9):e0310620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310620

Table 4. Summary of significant single-arm time effect.

Measurement Group Time p AW (%) CL (%)
deep squat FT T0 vs. T12 0.003 75.9 -
hurdle step FT T0 vs. T12 <0.001 94.0 -
in-line lunge FT T0 vs. T12 <0.001 75.0 -
shoulder mobility FT T0 vs. T12 <0.001 80.0 -
TT T0 vs. T12 0.03 66.5 -
active straight leg raise FT T0 vs. T12 0.001 77.0 -
trunk stability push-up FT T0 vs. T12 <0.001 85.6 -
rotary stability FT T0 vs. T12 0.01 70.0 -
total score FT T0 vs. T6 0.01 85.5 -
FT T0 vs. T12 <0.001 100 -
multistage fitness test FT T0 vs. T12 0.006 - 77.0
TT T0 vs. T12 0.009 - 76.1
hexagon test FT T0 vs. T6 0.005 - 77.5
FT T0 vs. T12 <0.001 - 96.5
TT T0 vs. T6 0.02 - 73.6
TT T0 vs. T12 <0.001 - 92.1
planned agility test FT T0 vs. T12 0.005 - 77.6
TT T0 vs. T12 0.02 - 73.8
sit and reach FT T0 vs. T12 0.003 - 79.1
20 metre sprint FT T0 vs. T12 <0.001 - 85.0
TT T0 vs. T12 0.004 - 78.0

Note. AWAW statistic; CL—common language effect size; FT—functional training; TT—traditional training.