Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 1;26(5):866–877. doi: 10.1007/s10903-024-01606-5

Table 2.

Option score elements present per encounter

Provider Patient Sum OPTION Score 0-100 OPTION Score OPTION Element Rating
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A 1 8 17 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
B 2 32 67 3 3 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 1 1 1
3 26 54 3 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 3
C 4 6 13 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
D 5 4 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E 11 19 40 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
12 16 33 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
13 23 48 3 3 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

OPTION elements: The clinician (1) draws attention to need for decision making process; (2) states there is more than one way to deal with the identified problem; (3) assesses patient’s preferred approach to receiving information; (4) lists options; (5) explains the pros and cons; (6) explores patient expectations; (7) explores the patient’s concerns; (8) checks patient understood; (9) offers explicit opportunities to ask questions; (10) elicits preferred level of involvement in decision making; (11) indicates need for a decision making (or deferring) stage; and (12) indicates need to review the decision.

NOTE: OPTION Score elements are rated from 0, behavior not observed, to 4, behavior is exhibited to a very high standard.