Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 14;29(8):2346–2358. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02506-8

Fig. 1. In vitro assays.

Fig. 1

a 5-HT2AR-mediated calcium mobilization assay of the tested 5-MeO-tryptamines and reference compounds 5-HT (full agonist) and dopamine (DA; partial agonist). Data are expressed as means ± SD for N ≥ 3 experiments. b 5-HT uptake inhibition at SERT. Data are expressed as percentage of control uptake (absence of tryptamine), as means ± SD for N ≥ 3 experiments. cf Effects of 5-MeO-DMT, 5-MeO-MET, 5-MeO-DET and 5-MeO-pyr-T on transport-mediated batch release of preloaded [3H]5-HT from HEK293 cells stably expressing SERT. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs release in absence of monensin (mixed-effects model, employing Šidák’s correction; N = 5). gj Whole-cell patch clamp experiments used to identify tryptamine-induced SERT-mediated inwardly directed currents in HEK293 cells (N = 5). kn Representative single-cell traces showing currents elicited by 10 µM of 5-MeO-DMT, 5-MeO-MET, 5-MeO-DET, and 5-MeO-pyr-T. Data are presented as means ± SD for N = 5 independent experiments. o Concentration-response relationship of 5-MeO-pyr-T measured in superfusion release assays at different concentrations, as percentage of total efflux (N = 5). KHB and pCA were used as control substances. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus KHB, ###p < 0.001 vs pCA (Tukey’s test).