Skip to main content
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine logoLink to Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
. 2024 Sep 19;28(18):e70099. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.70099

Microbiota–gut–brain axis in health and neurological disease: Interactions between gut microbiota and the nervous system

Yuhong He 1,2, Ke Wang 1, Niri Su 2, Chongshan Yuan 2, Naisheng Zhang 2, Xiaoyu Hu 2, Yunhe Fu 2, Feng Zhao 1,
PMCID: PMC11412916  PMID: 39300699

Abstract

Along with mounting evidence that gut microbiota and their metabolites migrate endogenously to distal organs, the ‘gut–lung axis,’ ‘gut–brain axis,’ ‘gut–liver axis’ and ‘gut–renal axis’ have been established. Multiple animal recent studies have demonstrated gut microbiota may also be a key susceptibility factor for neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and autism. The gastrointestinal tract is innervated by the extrinsic sympathetic and vagal nerves and the intrinsic enteric nervous system, and the gut microbiota interacts with the nervous system to maintain homeostatic balance in the host gut. A total of 1507 publications on the interactions between the gut microbiota, the gut–brain axis and neurological disorders are retrieved from the Web of Science to investigate the interactions between the gut microbiota and the nervous system and the underlying mechanisms involved in normal and disease states. We provide a comprehensive overview of the effects of the gut microbiota and its metabolites on nervous system function and neurotransmitter secretion, as well as alterations in the gut microbiota in neurological disorders, to provide a basis for the possibility of targeting the gut microbiota as a therapeutic agent for neurological disorders.

Keywords: gut microbiota, microbiota–gut–brain axis, nervous system, neurotransmitter

1. INTRODUCTION

The majority of microbial interactions with the body occur in the intestinal tract, ‘gut microbiota’ refers to the many microbial communities that live there. More than 1000 different species of bacteria make up the enormous and varied gut microbiota, 1 with the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes being the two most prevalent phyla. 2 Studies have shown that there is a complex network of interactions between the gut microbiota and the host, which in turn maintains homeostasis. 3 Gut homeostasis is a dynamic equilibrium condition that is maintained by the interactions between the host, gut microbiota, diet and metabolites. A generally steady intestinal homeostasis is required for maintaining the normal structure and physiological function of the intestine, inhibiting the colonization of pathogenic microorganisms and regulating host immunological response. However, alterations in external conditions or inappropriate and excessive use of antibiotics induce the dysbiosis of gut microbiota, primarily in the form of increased pathogenic bacteria or insufficient probiotics, triggering the secretion of amyloid and lipopolysaccharides (LPS), increasing intestinal permeability and allowing other cytokines like LPS to penetrate the intestinal wall, triggering toll‐like receptors (TLR) and releasing inflammatory cytokines. 4 Recent studies have shown that gut microbial dysbiosis not only induces gastrointestinal symptoms, but even impairs brain function, resulting in cognitive impairment, mood and behavioural changes. 5

The gut–brain axis primarily consists of the central nervous system (CNS), enteric nervous system (ENS), autonomic nervous system (ANS) and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (HPA). 6 A brand‐new idea, the microbiota–gut–brain axis (MGB), has been put forth since the microbiota is crucial to the communication between the gut and the brain. 4 Through the gut–brain axis, the microbiota affects the CNS, and vice versa. Studies have shown that inflammatory factors produced by gut dysbiosis increase the permeability of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), 7 which in turn penetrates brain tissue and induces neuroinflammation, while probiotics, on the contrary, prevent inflammatory cytokines from entering the blood circulation and lessen the harm to the nervous system. 8 Also, the composition and abundance of the gut microbiota significantly altered in people with neurological diseases as Parkinson's disease (PD), 9 depression 10 and Alzheimer's disease (AD). 11 The gut microbiota communicate with the brain via three parallel and interacting pathways 12 : (1) neural pathway; (2) immune pathway; (3) endocrine pathway. Although there are three parallel and related pathways for the MGB, this review focuses on the interaction between the neural pathway and the gut microbiota, with a providing a rationale for targeting the gut microbiota for the prevention and treatment of neurological disorders.

2. THE MICROBIOTA–GUT–BRAIN AXIS

In the 1880s, William James, an American psychologist, and Carl Lange, a Danish physiologist, initially proposed the hypothesis that the brain and the gut communicate in both directions. However, the concept of the gut–brain axis was not fully developed until the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Currently, the MGB axis represents an interaction network of gut microbiota, microbiota‐related metabolites, intestinal cells, multi‐level nervous system and neurohumoral pathways. 13 There are two basic types of methodologies utilized to research the interplay of the MGB axis: (1) studies utilizing germ‐free (GF) animals, followed by faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) to examine the influence of normal gut microbiota or particular intestinal bacteria on MGB axis 14 , 15 ; (2) mice with gut microbiota dysbiosis or the use of probiotic for mice exhibiting neurological symptoms to evaluate whether there is an improvement in symptoms, afterwards laterally validating the effect of microbiota on MGB axis. 16

The relationship between the gut microbiota and the brain involves a number of complex pathways, including immunological, neurological and endocrine pathway (Figure 1). 17 Because 70%–80% of immune cells in animals are located in lymphoid tissues linked with the colon, changes in the gut microbiota directly affect the intestinal immune system and provide a timely immunological response, 18 which has a significant impact on the CNS. 19 The interaction between the gut microbiota and the host controls the local immune response and releases cytokines into the bloodstream that disrupt the BBB and have a direct impact on brain function. Moreover, gut microbiota influences the number and function of microglia in the brain, which in turn influences brain function. 20 In addition to immune pathways, gut microbiota and their metabolites, such as indole derivatives, serotonin, γ‐aminobutyric acid (γ‐GABA), secondary bile acids and short‐chain fatty acid (SCFAs), may control the production of neuropeptides via endothelial cell and enteroendocrine cells (EECs) or may directly release neurotransmitters and neuromodulators, which may affect brain function. 21 , 22 Moreover, the neural pathway directly connects the brain to the gut and consists mainly of the sympathetic nerve (SN), the vagus nerve (VN) and the ENS. The entire gut is innervated by a dense neural network, including the intrinsic ENS (up to 200–500 million neurons) and the extrinsic VN, SN, spinal and sensory nociceptive nerves. Multiple reflex circuits formed between the external and internal nerves innervating the intestine, synaptic connections between the extrinsic nerves and the dorsal horn neurons of the spinal cord and the nucleus of solitary tract of VN can transmit a variety of information from the intestine to the brain. 23

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Three pathways between the microbiota–gut–brain axis. The gut microbiota and the CNS communicate via at least three parallel and related pathways. The gut microbiota potentially metabolizes and produce neurotransmitters, neuroactive substances, SCFAs and other substances that influence brain function and development by crossing the BBB. Moreover, there is a direct neuronal connection from the gut to the brain known as the VN, which is able to sense messages emitted by enteric neurons to directly affect brain function. Neurotransmitters or hormones enter the bloodstream alongside cytokines released by immune cells and penetrate the BBB, impacting the mood, cognition and behaviour. Schematic created with BioRender.com.

2.1. Sympathetic innervation of the gastrointestinal tract

Intestinal sympathetic innervation originates from prevertebral ganglia within the abdomen, including the paired celiac (CG) and superior/inferior mesenteric regions (SMG/IMG). 24 Initial reports suggested that sympathetic fibres were infrequent in the intestinal mucosa, but as histological techniques advanced, this belief was disproved. 25 Immunohistochemistry for norepinephrine synthase, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) or dopamine β‐hydroxylase is now available to localize sympathetic neurons. 24 , 26 It is now widely believed that sympathetic nerve fibres enter the intestinal wall along the arteries and terminate in the submuscular and submucosal plexuses. In addition to entering the enteric plexus, sympathetic nervous fibres also innervate the mucosa and lymphoid tissue surrounding the colon. 27 Generally, the sympathetic nervous system inhibits intestinal peristalsis and secretion as well as mediating inflammatory responses through catecholamines and neuropeptides. 28 Additionally, norepinephrine (NE), a neurotransmitter released by sympathetic postganglionic fibre endings, binds to adrenergic receptors and inhibits gastric secretion and muscular activity. 29 Furthermore, epinephrine (E) binding to adrenergic receptors surrounding macrophages proximal axons may affect cytokine levels and inflammatory responses. 30

2.2. Vagal innervation of the gastrointestinal tract

The parasympathetic nerves that innervate the gastrointestinal tract are primarily derived from the VN, while those that innervate the distal colon are derived from the sacral section of the spinal cord's pelvic nerve. The VN, which serves as the tenth brain nerve as well as a component of the peripheral nervous system (PNS), extends from the brainstem and innervate the viscera, allowing them to be the fastest and most direct pathway of communication between the gut microbiota and the brain. 4 The VN, which has an 80% afferent fibre composition and 20% efferent fibre, has the ability to transfer information from the bottom‐up and provide feedback from the top‐down. 4 Their preganglionic fibres replace intramural plexus neurons after entering the gastrointestinal wall, and the postganglionic fibres that follow the replacement are dispersed to the gastrointestinal wall's smooth muscle and glandular cells. 31 The majority of postganglionic fibres are excitatory cholinergic fibres, which means that the fibre terminals release acetylcholine (Ach) and activate the effector organs. A few of them are inhibitory fibres whose ends do not produce Ach but may be peptides, so these intramural nerves are known as peptidergic nerves. 32

2.3. The ENS

In 1921, Langley was the first to refer to the nerve plexus that makes up the gut wall as the ENS. The ENS is made up of enteric neurons and enteric glial cells (EGCs) and can be divided into intermuscular and submucosal plexuses, which is independent of the CNS and does not require its innervation, yet it is regulated by the SN and VN. 33 The structure and function of enteric neurons can be roughly categorized into three groups: intrinsic primary afferent neurons that perceive inputs, intermediate neurons that relay information and motor neurons that control motor and humoral secretion, among other functions. The ENS regulates gastrointestinal motility and secretion, the biological functions of intestinal epithelial, and immune response and inflammatory processes. 34

In conclusion, interactions between the SN, VN and ENS are necessary for the neuronal pathways of the MGB (Figure 2). Some microbial elements, microbial regulatory hormones and microbial‐dependent immune mediators interact with the ENS and its innervated vagus and spinal afferent nerves directly to transfer information to the brain and affect brain function. 35 In turn, spinal and vagal efferent nerves send instructions from the brain to the gut to regulate gastrointestinal function. 36 So how do the nervous system and gut microbiota interact to maintain homeostasis, and how do gut microbiota and the nervous system change in disease states? This paper aims to summarize the interactions between neurotransmitters, the nervous system and the gut microbiota in both healthy and diseased states.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Innervation of the gastrointestinal nervous system. The intrinsic enteric nervous system and extrinsic vagus, sympathetic and spinal nerves, as well as sensory nociceptive nerves, innervate the entire gastrointestinal tract. The submucosal and intermuscular plexuses, which independently regulate gastrointestinal motility, secretion and blood flow. The activity of the gastrointestinal tract is influenced by the sympathetic and parasympathetic afferent fibres signalling to the CNS. Moreover, sympathetic and parasympathetic efferent fibres transfer information about the gastrointestinal tract to the CNS, which in turn impacts brain function. Schematic created with BioRender.com.

2.4. Intestinal cells in the gut microbiota‐brain

A variety of cell types are distributed throughout the gut, including immune cells, neuronal cells and epithelial cells that constitute the gut's mucosal lining. The intestinal epithelium is a distinctive mucosal interface constituted of intestinal epithelial cells, whose monitoring and defensive functions are vital for the maintenance of gut homeostasis. Various EECs within the intestinal epithelium not only mediate physiological effects through the release of a variety of hormones, but it has also been demonstrated that there is an anatomical link between EECs and neurons. 37 It is noteworthy that enterochromaffin cells (ECs), which are derived from basal stem cells of the intestinal epithelium, interact with nutrients, the ENS, and gut microbiota, and secrete approximately 95% of the body's 5‐hydroxytryptamine (5‐HT). 38 , 39 Recent studies have demonstrated that ECs cells express sensory receptors, indicating that ECs potentially function as chemoreceptors that directly perceive a diverse range of stimuli both in vivo and ex vivo. 40 Additionally, they have the capacity to establish synaptic connections with afferent neurons to transfer information. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the gut microbiota significantly modulates 5‐HT synthesis in the colon. It may be postulated that this phenomenon is related to the upregulation of the expression of the rate‐limiting enzyme for 5‐HT synthesis, TPH1, by SCFAs and certain secondary bile acids. 22 , 39

In addition, another aspect of the role of intestinal cells in the MGB axis is mainly characterized by interactions with the ENS. Enteric neurons located in the circumflex plexus transport nerve fibres to the submucosal plexus but do not come into direct contact with immune cells. 41 These neurons express a wide range of neuropeptides, including Neuromedin U (NMU), NE, Calcitoningenerelatedpeptide (CGRP) and so forth. 42 It has been demonstrated that ILC2 cells localized around NMU+ neurons express NMU1 receptors at high levels. 42 Activation of NMUR promotes the secretion of IL‐5 and IL‐13, whereas NE activates the β2AR on the surface of ILC2 to suppress type II immunity. 42 Similarly, enteric neurons located in the submucosal plexus transport nerve fibres to the lamina propria to release vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), which in turn activates VIPAC2 on the surface of CCR6 + ILC3 cells, leading to the release of IL‐22 and exerting barrier protection. 43 In addition, VIP activates VIPAC1 on the surface of CCR6 + ILC3 to promote ILC3 recruitment to the gut. In addition, the development of M cells, which is crucial during antigen sampling, is inhibited by exogenous neuronal dorsal root ganglion in the gut via CGRP. 44 Whereas intestinal nNOS+ neurons secrete IL‐18, which in turn induces the release of antimicrobial peptides from goblet cell, 45 Ach activates mAchR3/4 receptors on the surface of goblet cell to regulate the secretion of antimicrobial peptides and mucus. 46

3. GUT MICROBIOTAS INTERACTING WITH THE NERVOUS SYSTEM UNDER PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS

GF mice are a valuable resource for studying microbiology, immunology, oncology and nutritional metabolism because they are not exposed to microorganisms from birth and have distinct developmental and physiological functions compared to specific pathogen free (SPF) mice. 47 GF mice have also been instrumental in investigating the role of microbiota in neurodevelopment. The absence of microbiota in GF mice induces many neurobiological changes associated with several neurological disorders, including brain development, myelination, neurogenesis and microglial activation. 47 , 48 , 49

3.1. Influence of the gut microbiota on the CNS

The development and behavioural functions of the brain is significantly influenced by gut microbiota. The most convincing evidence comes from the fact that neurodevelopmental processes are correlated with changes in maternal and neonatal gut microbiota, 50 and that alterations in a mother's microbiota may have an impact on her offspring's microbiome, neurodevelopment and behaviour. 51 Numerous studies have demonstrated that GF mice experience heightened prefrontal cortical myelin formation and myelin gene expression. 48 Additionally, the hippocampus and amygdala show an increase in volume, and there is an increase in hippocampal neurogenesis. 52 , 53 Furthermore, GF mice have been shown to accumulate less α‐synuclein (α‐Syn), the most significant protein in PD pathogenesis. 54 Furthermore, it is noteworthy that GF mice induce an immature phenotype in microglia, an essential regulator of neuroinflammation, leading to changes in their development and maturity. 52 , 55 , 56 GF mice also have an increased permeability of the BBB, resulting in the translocation of immune cells or bacterial components into the brain and an impact on neuroinflammation. 57 Furthermore, a number of trophic factors or proteins that affect brain development and plasticity, including brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), synaptophysin, postsynaptic dense area protein and others, have been shown to be regulated by gut microbiota. 58 , 59 BDNF is a plasticity protein that stimulates neurogenesis, synapse formation and regulates synapses. 60 It is closely related to the development of learning, memory, cognition and other bodily functions. In particular, BDNF expression was considerably downregulated in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus and hypothalamus of GF mice, as well as the mRNA expression of genes involved in synaptic plasticity. 60

Gut microbiota not only influences how the brain develops, but it can also have an impact on how the CNS functions. Most notably, GF mice are susceptible to anxiety, but FMT eases anxiety. For instance, Citrobacter infection increases anxiety behaviour and the expression of the c‐Fos protein in the vagal ganglia, 61 whereas Lactobacillus rhamnosus improves anxiety and depressive behaviour in stressed mice and restores γ‐GABA expression levels to normal in the hippocampus, hypothalamus and prefrontal lobes. 62

3.2. Influence of the gut microbiota on the SN and VN

In addition to its direct effects on the brain, gut microbiota also modulates the SN and VN. It has been reported that gut microbiota colonization of SPF mice reverses elevated levels of intestinal epithelial ganglion (CG‐SMG) activity in GF and antibiotic‐depleted gut microbial mice, implying that gut microbiota depletion might lead to a large rise in intestinal‐exogenous sympathetic nerve activity. 63 Moreover, transcriptome and 16S rRNA sequencing studies indicate that particular bacteria that produce SCFAs and their metabolites influence the level of intestinal sympathetic neuronal activity via modulating the expression of the neuronal transcription factor c‐Fos. 63 Furthermore, gut microbiota also influences vagally mediated effects. It has been demonstrated that particular bacterial strains communicate with the brain and modify behaviour by vagal signals. For instance, intestinal colonization with Campylobacter jejuni caused anxiety‐like behaviour in mice, which was linked to higher c‐Fos expression in the vagal afferent brain areas. 64 It has also been demonstrated that, if the VN structure is intact, Bifidobacterium longum/Lactobacillus rhamnosus reduces anxiety states in mice with colitis. 65 , 66 Likewise, Lactobacillus reuteri improved social impairments in mice with autism spectrum disorders by raising the level of oxytocin in the paraventricular nucleus via stimulating the VN. 67 In addition, gut microbiota modulates the release of hormones from EECs, such as cholecystokinin (CCK) and glucagon‐like peptides (GLP), which bind to specific receptors on the afferent fibres of the VN, which in turn feed back to the brain. 68

3.3. Influence of the gut microbiota on the ENS

The formation and maturity of the ENS depend heavily on the gut microbiota. With the establishment of the gut microbiota, the ENS was developed during fetal life develops and matures. 69 Many investigations have established that the network density of the jejunal and ileal interosseous plexus was dramatically reduced in GF mice compared to SPF animals, as well as the number of neurons in the interosseous ganglion, resulting in structural abnormalities of the jejunal and ileal interosseous plexus, whereas the number of neurons was restored after colonization of gut microbiota. 69 , 70 Recent evidence suggests that the microbiota is critical for the development and homeostasis of EGCs in the ENS, as evidenced by the fact that GF and antibiotic‐treated animals exhibit reduced numbers of EGCs. 71 In addition, specific bacterial strains have an effect on the ENS. For example, Lactobacillus reuteri increased the excitability of mouse intestinal neurons 72 and modulated the amplitude of the in vitro colonic nerve dependent rhythm complex. 73 , 74

3.4. Metabolites of the gut microbiota interact with the nervous system

Host‐microbiota interactions in the gut lead to the release of byproducts (cytokines, chemokines, and neurotransmitters) that enter into the blood, lymphatic system and brain. Altered levels of gut microbiota metabolites in diseases such as autism, mood disorders and AD are another piece of evidence that gut metabolites affect the nervous system. Patients with autism had higher levels of acetate and propionate and decreased levels of butyrate. 75 Similarly, a significant reduction in the composition of butyrate‐producing gut microbiota was found in depressed patients. 76 Transplantation of gut microbiota from senescent mice (24 months old) to the GF young mice (5–6 weeks old) for 8 weeks promoted neuronal regeneration in mice, and further studies revealed that this effect was mainly mediated by butyrate‐producing microorganisms, suggesting that butyrate has a stimulatory effect on neural regeneration. 77 Numerous studies have shown that tryptophan metabolism is a key metabolic pathway in the MGB. There are three main metabolic pathways of tryptophan in the gastrointestinal tract: the indole and its derivatives metabolic pathway by gut microbiota, the host kynurenine oxidative degradation pathway and the host 5‐hydroxy tryptamine (5‐HT) synthesis pathway. Most tryptophan in mammals is degraded via the kynurenine pathway, and only 1% of tryptophan makes it to the 5‐HT pathway. Tryptophan metabolic pathways and related metabolites are associated with behavioural and cognitive symptoms of neurological disorders. For example, mice receiving gut microbiota from depressed patients exhibited increased anxiety‐like behaviour and high levels of kynurenine. 78 , 79 , 80 GF mice exhibits stronger anxiety‐like behaviour and serotonin levels compared to normal mice. 81 Trpa1 is an excitatory calcium‐permeable non‐selective cation channel with important roles in nociception and neuroinflammation. Tryptophan catabolite metabolites produced by gut microbiota activate Trpa1 channels on the EECs, leading to rapid activation of VN. 21

Both the direct developmental contribution of gut microbiota to the nervous system and the indirect protection afforded by gut microbiota are indicative of the close relationship between gut microbiota and the nervous system. In addition to the effects of gut microbiota on the nervous system described above, certain gut microbiota affects neurotransmitter production or produce neurotransmitters directly.

3.5. Regulation of neurotransmitters by gut microbiota and metabolites

The regulation of neurotransmitters by gut microbiota is mediated by three main pathways: (1) certain gut microbiota encode genes for enzymes required for neurotransmitter synthesis, which in turn catalyse the conversion of substrates into the corresponding neurotransmitters or precursors; (2) gut microbiota produce neuroactive compounds, for instance, Lactobacillus produce Ach, γ‐GABA, Bifidobacterium produce γ‐GABA, Bacillus/Escherichia coli produce NE, serotonin, dopamine and Streptococcus/Enterococcus/Candida produce serotonin. These neurotransmitters cross the intestinal mucosa and enter the circulation, which in turn affect the function of the CNS or directly activates the VN to transmit messages to the brain; (3) gut microbiota regulate the synthesis and release of neurotransmitters by EECs through their metabolites. In addition, neurotransmitters also affect the brain function and cognitive ability through three pathways: (1) direct action on the VN; (2) action on the ENS; (3) entry into the blood circulation and crossing the BBB. We summarize the genera of gut bacteria producing relevant neurotransmitters that are currently reviewable in the literature (Table 1). In the following, we focus on Ach, 5‐HT, γ‐GABA and NE as examples to explore the regulatory role of gut microbiota and their metabolites in the synthesis and secretion of neurotransmitters.

TABLE 1.

Summary of neurotransmitters produced by gut bacteria.

Neurotransmitter Crosses the BBB Bacterial strain References
Ach No Lactobacillus plantarum; Bacillus acetylcholine; Bacillus subtilis; Escherichia coli; Staphylococcus aureus 82, 83, 84
γ‐GABA No Bifidobacterium; Bacteroides fragilis; Parabacteroides; Eubacterium 85, 86, 87, 88, 89
Noradrenaline No Bacillus mycoides; Bacillus subtilis; Escherichia coli (K‐12); Proteus vulgaris; Serratia marcescens 90, 91
Serotonin No Escherichia coli (K‐12); Hafnia alvei (NCIMB, 11999); Klebsiella pneumoniae (NCIMB, 673); Lactobacillus plantarum (FI8595); Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris (MG 1363); Morganella morganii (NCIMB, 10466); Streptococcus thermophilus (NCFB2392) 91, 92, 93
Dopamine No Bacillus cereus; Bacillus mycoides; Bacillus subtilis; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli (K‐12); Hafnia alvei (NCIMB, 11999); Klebsiella pneumoniae (NCIMB, 673); Morganella morganii (NCIMB, 10466); Proteus vulgaris; Serratia marcescens; Staphylococcus aureus 90, 91, 92
Histamine No Citrobacter freundii; Enterobacter spp.; Hafnia alvei (NCIMB, 11999); Klebsiella pneumoniae (NCIMB, 673); Lactobacillus plantarum (FI8595); Lactobacillus hilgardii; Lactobacillus mali; Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris (MG 1363); Lactococcus lactissubsp. lactis (IL1403); Morganella morganii (NCIMB, 10466); Oenococcus oeni; Pediococcus parvulus; Streptococcus thermophiles (NCFB2392) 94, 95, 96, 97

3.5.1. Ach

Ach is the most common cholinergic neurotransmitter in the intestinal tract and transmits excitatory signals between neurons. 98 The biosynthesis of Ach is mainly accomplished by the interaction of choline from the systemic circulation with acetyl coenzyme A with the participation of specific choline acetyltransferases. It is then released by sympathetic preganglionic fibres, parasympathetic preganglionic and postganglionic fibres. It has been demonstrated that gut microbiota plays an important role in the synthesis and secretion of Ach. For example, there are abnormalities in neuromuscular junction function and reduced expression of serum choline (acetylcholine precursor) in GF mice. 99 In addition, Ach in the intestine can be produced by a variety of bacteria, 100 such as Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, especially Staphylococcus aureus, which induces the release of Ach from neurons and acts on intestinal epithelial cells. 101 Studies have shown that combination therapy with Chlorella acidophilus KABP 021, Lactobacillus plantarum KABP 022 and Lactobacillus plantarum KABP 023 alleviate IBS‐associated inflammation and gut microbiota dysbiosis by producing acetate and Ach. 102

It is noteworthy that Ach is a chemical in the brain that is closely related to learning and memory functions. In the CNS, Ach plays an important role in plasticity, arousal and feedback. Damage to the cholinergic system in the brain has been shown to be associated with memory deficits in AD. 103

3.5.2. 5‐HT

5‐HT, also known as serotonin, is an inhibitory neurotransmitter involved in the regulation of the mood, energy, memory, etc. Abnormal expression of 5‐HT in the brain is associated with psychiatric disorders such as depression and anxiety. 104 Tryptophan is the only precursor substance of 5‐HT. 90% of 5‐HT in the intestine is produced by ECs, but some bacteria also produce small amounts. Studies have shown that compared to SPF mice, GF mice have significantly lower serum 5‐HT concentrations and altered ECs morphology, while these changes are restored after colonization with gut microbiota. 105 In addition, numerous studies in recent years have shown that gut microbiota and its metabolites affect the rate‐limiting enzymes to regulate 5‐HT levels. For example, antibiotic‐treated mice showed no change in the number of ECs but decreased Tph1 gene expression, 106 and colonization of GF mice with spore‐forming bacteria upregulated colonic Tph1 expression and downregulated serotonin transporter SlC6A4 expression, increasing 5‐HT levels in the colon and blood, suggesting that factors regulating Tph1 exist in the gut and are associated with microorganisms. 107

It is noteworthy that under normal conditions, 5‐HT is unable to cross the BBB. 108 Nevertheless, minute quantities of free plasma tryptophan can traverse the BBB to generate 5‐HT within the brain, which in turn facilitates excitatory neurotransmission via the G protein ion channel serotonin receptors. Furthermore, elevated plasma 5‐HT levels can enhance the permeability of the BBB, temporarily allowing plasma 5‐HT to enter the central nervous system. 109

3.5.3. γ‐GABA

γ‐GABA is an inhibitory neurotransmitter, a non‐protein amino acid produced by glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) catalysing the decarboxylation of L‐glutamate. GAD is encoded by the gadB and gadC genes, which are contained in most gut microbiota, but the mechanisms regulating the activity of GAD in E. coli sources have been more comprehensively studied. Previous studies have found that Lactobacillus/Bifidobacterium/Bacteroidetes synthesize γ‐GABA using glutamate or the gut microbiota synthesize γ‐GABA by direct conversion of the excitatory transmitter Glu. 85 This study also showed that the abundance of Bacteroidetes spp. associated with the γ‐GABA production pathway was negatively correlated with depressive features of the brain, and that γ‐GABA dysregulation is often present in depressed patients. 85 Notably, γ‐GABA cannot cross the BBB, meaning that enteric‐derived γ‐GABA may act on the CNS by affecting the VN and ENS. It has also been demonstrated that enteric‐derived γ‐GABA is transported by GAT2 to EECs, where it binds to GABA‐A and inhibits the secretion of GLP‐1, which in turn activates the solitary tract nucleus of the brainstem and the dorsal nucleus of the vagus nerve via the VN. 110

3.5.4. NE

NE is a catecholamine bioactive substance, which is synthesized gradually from tyrosine by the action of various enzymes and is synthesized and secreted by sympathetic postganglionic neurons and adrenergic neurons in the brain. Notably, although NE can cross the placenta, it cannot cross the BBB. In the brain, NE is mainly produced by nucleus coeruleus, where the neurotransmitter precursor tyrosine is converted to dopamine and finally to NE. Among other things, dopamine is also a separate neurotransmitter, and dysregulation of the dopamine system is a feature of certain neurological disorders such as schizophrenia and PD. 111 , 112 The intestine synthesizes more than 50% of dopamine, and aromatic amino acid decarboxylase expressed in staphylococcus metabolizes L‐3,4‐dihydroxyphenylalanine substances to produce dopamine. 92 Studies have shown that increased thermogenesis in Brandt's voles during cold acclimation is accompanied by increases in monoamine neurotransmitters such as NE, gastric hunger hormones and SCFAs and changes in cecum microbiota, while the results of FMT suggest that low temperature flora elevates levels of SCFAs and its receptors and NE. 113 In addition, Escherichia spp., Bacillus spp. and yeast were able to produce NE. 114

3.6. Changes of gut microbiota in neurological diseases

Numerous studies have discovered major changes in the gut microbiota of people with neurological diseases (Table 2), suggesting a crucial role for the gut microbiota in neuropsychiatric disorders. For instance, clinical studies have repeatedly demonstrated that GF mice with the FMT from individuals with various psychiatric disorders exhibit the behavioural and physiological characteristic of the disorder. 115 , 116 , 117 Moreover, research have indicated that the majority of individuals with neurological diseases had large reductions in gut microbiota richness, and changes in composition, but no significant variations in Shannon and Simpson indices. 118 , 119

TABLE 2.

Changes in gut microbiota in patients with neurological disorders.

Diseases Main features Gut microbiota elevated abundance Gut microbiota reduced abundance References
Alzheimer's disease Progressive cognitive impairment; memory impairment; aphasia; visuospatial impairment; executive dysfunction Candida, Proteus; Staphylococcus; Clostridium; Akermannia; Streptococcus; Escherichia‐Shigella Bifidobacterium; Microbacillus; Bacteroides; Lactobacillus; Bifidobacterium; Pasteurella; Prevotella; Succinivibrio 120, 121, 122
Autism

Social impairment, narrow interests, repetitive stereotyped behaviour

Gastrointestinal symptoms: constipation, diarrhoea, flatulence

Lactobacillus;

Actinomyces; Clostridium; Desulfovibrio;

Enterobacteriaceae

Prevotella; Bifidobacterium 123
Parkinson's disease

Motor symptoms: resting tremor, slow movements, muscle stiffness and abnormal posture and gait

Non‐motor symptoms: autonomic dysfunction, cognitive decompensation, depression, anxiety and sleep disorders

Gastrointestinal symptoms: constipation, abdominal pain, diarrhoea and reflux

Shigella spp.; Enterococcus spp.; Bacillus variabilis; Streptococcus spp.

Prevotella;

Faecococcus spp.

Cyanobacteria;

Genera regulating the production of SCFAs

123, 124, 125
Multiple Sclerosis Ataxia, motor disorders, cognitive disorders

Clostridium bolteae;

Methanobrevibacter; Balch and Wolfe;

Akkermansia; muciniphila

Methanobrevibacter spp.;

Akkermansia spp.;

Butyricimonas spp.

126, 127
Major Depressive Disorder Persistent and recurrent depressed mood, loss of interest, decreased volition and somatic symptoms Prevotella spp.; Klebsiella spp.; Streptococcus spp Bifidobacterium; Lactobacillus 128

4. INTERACTIONS BETWEEN GUT MICROBES AND THE NERVOUS SYSTEM IN NEUROLOGICAL DISEASES

Recent clinical trials and studies have shown that gut microbiota modulate the development of neurological diseases.

4.1. Alzheimer's disease

AD is a set of brain dysfunction syndromes produced by persistent or progressive organic damage to brain structures, with the development of amyloid plaques and inflammatory response in microglia being two of its most notable hallmarks. 11 It is now generally accepted that patients have β‐amyloid (Aβ) deposits in the brain, which in turn induce the formation of senile plaques, Tau protein hyperphosphorylation resulting in neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) and neuronal loss, accompanied by glial cell proliferation and eventually progressive cognitive loss and behavioural disturbances. Recent research has revealed that the abundance and composition of gut microbiota are altered in AD patients, 129 but the order in which these changes occur in relation to pathological brain changes and the part intestinal strains play in this are still mysteries.

The current theories regarding the possible processes include: (1) gut microbial dysbiosis increase the permeability of the BBB and intestinal barrier, resulting in systemic and CNS inflammation; (2) gut microbial dysbiosis impact the secretion of neuroactive chemicals including γ‐GABA, 5‐HT, and β‐N‐methylamino‐L‐alanine; for example, research have demonstrated that cyanobacteria produce the neurotoxic compound β‐N‐methylamino‐L‐alanine, that causes neurological degeneration in the brain and consequently causes neurodegenerative disorders including AD and PD. 91 (3) gut microbial dysbiosis cause an overgrowth of pathogenic bacteria.

4.2. Parkinson's disease

PD is the most common type of movement disorder characterized by loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra striata, accompanied by autonomic dysfunction and psychiatric abnormalities and gut dysfunction. 9 Constipation is the most common symptom of bowel dysfunction in PD and is usually present 10–20 years before the onset of motor symptoms, suggesting that PD may begin in the gastrointestinal tract. 130 Misfolding of α‐Syn is a direct factor leading to dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra of PD patients. 131 However, it has been shown that after injection of α‐Syn into the intestinal lining of rats, its pathway accumulates first in the enteric nerve and then retrogrades to the vagus system to reach the dorsal root motor ganglion and finally to the brain center to induce PD. similarly, vagotomy in this experiment blocked the development of PD. 132 In addition, SPF mice overexpressing α‐syn (ASO) exhibited increased α‐syn aggregation and impaired locomotion, whereas ASO‐germ‐free mice (ASO‐GF) showed no significant α‐syn aggregation and significantly less impaired locomotion than ASO‐SPF mice. 54 ASO‐GF mice transplanted with faeces from PD patients exhibited signs of increased dyskinesia, suggesting that microorganisms are indeed involved in α‐syn‐mediated dyskinesia. 133

It is inferred that gut microbial dysbiosis may lead to pathological aggregation of α‐syn in the ENS by damaging the intestinal epithelial barrier, increasing intestinal permeability, exposure of pro‐inflammatory bacteria and products and inflammatory mediators to the ENS, and activation of EGCs, which in turn may spread to the CNS via the VN. In addition, gut microbiota dysbiosis leads to the BBB disruption, directly causing CNS inflammation and pathological aggregation of α‐Syn, leading to apoptosis of dopaminergic neurons. 134 Interestingly, it has also been shown that gut microbiota dysbiosis decreases the concentration of SCFAs or affects the levels of neurotransmitters and hormones such as 5‐HT, inducing a decrease in endogenous neuroprotective factors leading to dopaminergic neuron apoptosis.

4.3. Autism

Approximately 40% of individuals with autism have gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhoea, abdominal pain and constipation, and the correlation between gastrointestinal symptoms and autism severity demonstrates the importance of the link between the gut microbiota and the brain. 135 Investigation of stool samples from children with autism showed increased levels of Lactobacillus, Clostridium and Desulfovibrio. 136 When vancomycin was used weekly to treat children with autism, it significantly improved neurological and gastrointestinal symptoms. 137

Although numerous studies have indicated a potential association between an impaired immune system and gut microbiota in autism, the precise mechanism by which altered gut microbiota contribute to immune abnormalities in autism remains unclear. It is noteworthy that there is also evidence indicating that there is a negligible direct association between autism and gut microbiota, but a strong association with diet. Autism‐related traits promote dietary preferences, which in turn leads to a reduction in the diversity of gut microbiota and the induction of gastrointestinal problems in children with autism. 138

4.4. Depression

Depression is a major mood disorder, caused mainly by psychiatric disorders, immune dysregulation, genetic factors and environmental, characterized by persistent low mood and recurrent thoughts of death. While it is not entirely clear whether there is a causal relationship between gut microbiota and depression, it has long been recognized that gut microbiota plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of depression. 78 An increasing number of studies have shown that the gut microbiomes of healthy individuals and depressed patients differ significantly, mainly in terms of enrichment of pro‐inflammatory bacteria and depletion of anti‐inflammatory bacteria. 139 , 140 Furthermore, FMT of depressed patients induced depression‐like behaviour in rodents, suggesting that dysbiosis may be involved in the pathogenesis of depression. 79 The current study also found that Mycobacterium spp was enriched in depressed patients and that Mycobacterium spp also significantly increased susceptibility to depression. 141 In addition, SCFAs were found to be reduced in depressed patients, but exogenous butyrate supplementation may alleviate depression via the HPA axis. 142

The preceding association studies found a strong link between aberrations in gut microbiota homeostasis and depression; however, they did not provide evidence on aetiology. The findings reveal that MGB axis disruption is key in the pathophysiology of depression. 143 Notably, overactivation of the HPA axis is one of the causes of depression, and gut microbiota dysbiosis can result in the production of different mediators, such as pro‐inflammatory cytokines and microbial antigens, which activate the HPA axis across the BBB. 144 Furthermore, gut microbiota dysbiosis increases permeability of the intestinal barriers and BBB, and peripheral pro‐inflammatory cytokines enter the brain and activate microglia, resulting in neuroinflammation. 145 Neurotransmitters, including 5‐HT, NE and γ‐GABA, are metabolized by gut microbiota and play a crucial role in the formation and plasticity of brain circuits linked to mood disorders including depression. γ‐GABA is the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain and malfunction has been linked to various neurological disorders such as depression. 146 Studies have demonstrated that the gut microbiota may generate or deplete GABA, which impacts circulating GABA levels; for example, serum GABA levels are considerably lower in GF animals. 85

4.5. Alterations in the gastrointestinal system in neurological disorders

In conclusion, the interaction between the gut microbiota and the brain plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of neurological disorders such as AD, PD, autism and depression. Conversely, numerous clinical observations have demonstrated that patients with neurological disorders frequently exhibit abnormalities in gastrointestinal function and alterations in gut microbiota composition. For example, approximately 40% of autistic patients present with symptoms of gastrointestinal dysfunction, including abdominal cramps, diarrhoea, reflux and vomiting. 147 Furthermore, a substantial body of evidence from numerous studies indicates that neurological abnormalities, such as stress, depression and overexertion, can disrupt gastrointestinal homeostasis, impair intestinal barrier function and increase intestinal permeability. 148

Similarly, gastrointestinal dysfunction is prevalent and precedes motor symptoms in patients with PD. 149 However, current studies are primarily focused on describing and evaluating gastrointestinal symptoms, with fewer studies investigating the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal dysfunction. It is currently believed that gastrointestinal dysfunction in Parkinson's patients is associated with ENS, dorsal motor nucleus of vagus (DMV), gut microecological dysbiosis and intestinal barrier disruption. Studies have demonstrated that the abnormal accumulation of Lewy bodies in the ENS has been observed in the early stages of PD patients, with the potential to reach the CNS through the VN and induce nigrostriatal lesions. 150 , 151 Furthermore, the absence of certain enteric neurons and the abnormal activation of enteric glial cells and pro‐inflammatory phenotype are present in patients with PD and animal models. 152 , 153 It is worth noting that intestinal microecological dysregulation in PD patients may trigger gastrointestinal function. The abundance of pro‐inflammatory bacteria Akkermansia, Oscillopsia and Bacteroides was shown to be dramatically elevated in faecal samples from PD patients, resulting in local intestine inflammation. 154 Additionally, changing microbial metabolites alter gastrointestinal function. Elevated levels of p‐cresol and phenylacetylglutamine in metabolites have been found in PD patients, and both are closely linked with the severity of constipation. 155 There are no specific guidelines for assessing and treating gastrointestinal dysfunction in PD patients, so finding new therapeutic targets that can easily alleviate PD‐induced gastrointestinal dysfunction is critical to improving the disease's progression and patients' quality of life.

5. TARGETING GUT MICROBIOTA FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEUROLOGICAL DISEASES

Recent findings have shown the potential of microbial interventions in modulating neurological disorders driven by gut ecological dysregulation. Diet, prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and FMT are the main strategies for targeting the gut microbiota to treat neurological disorders (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Targeting gut microbiota for the treatment of neurological diseases. Dietary regimens, prebiotics, probiotics and FMT represent potential adjunctive therapeutic strategies for neurological disorders, with the regulation of gut microbiota being a key area of interest. The dietary intake of nutrients and their metabolites has been demonstrated to modulate neuroinflammation, with dietary interventions showing promise in ameliorating the dysfunctions and metabolic disorders commonly seen in neurological disorders. Prebiotics and probiotics can be selectively utilized by host microorganisms and contribute to the creation of a healthy gut environment, which may result in the balancing of the gut microbiota and the production of metabolites, such as organic acids, to maintain organismal health. Furthermore, FMT has been demonstrated to treat central nervous system disorders, including autism and Parkinson's disease. Schematic created with BioRender.com.

5.1. Diet therapy

Diet composition to some extent influences the composition of the gut microbiota, and there is growing evidence that altering the gut microbiota by diet may substantially affect the progression of neurological disorders. For example, a high‐fat diet may increase amyloid angiopathy and oxidative stress, predisposing to cognitive dysfunction and AD 156 , 157 ; in contrast, the Mediterranean diet (MD) may attenuate the progression of AD, and the beneficial effects of the MD may be mediated by the gut microbiota and its anti‐inflammatory properties. 158 , 159 In addition, ketogenic diets that are high in fat, adequate in protein and low in carbohydrates may limit glycolysis and increase fatty acid oxidation to produce ketone bodies, which in turn may have a significant effect on ameliorating neurodegenerative diseases. 160 , 161

In conclusion, poor dietary intake contributes to gut microbiota dysbiosis, which in turn contributes to neurodegeneration, cognitive decline and anxiety‐like behaviours, while rational dietary interventions can modulate gut microbiota and ameliorate neurodegenerative disorders to some extent. It is worth noting that, in addition to diet, the general lifestyle of patients with neurological disorders requires particular attention. Restrictive diets may play a crucial role in reducing health risks and cardiovascular disease factors in these patients, but highly restrictive diets may also make patients more susceptible to malnutrition by reducing gut microbiota diversity. 162

5.2. Probiotics

Probiotics have been applied to exert anti‐inflammatory effects in intestinal and extra‐intestinal distal organ diseases due to their role in regulating the gut microbiota, enhancing the intestinal barrier and producing beneficial metabolites. 163 Commonly used probiotics include Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Bacillus and Enterococcus. Bonfili et al. first demonstrated that long‐term supplementation with SLAB51, a probiotic preparation of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, reduced neuronal protein hydrolysis and Aβ aggregation and attenuated cognitive decline and brain damage in Tg mice through a mechanism that may involve a reduction in oxidative stress through the SIRT3 pathway. 164 Furthermore, animal‐based studies on probiotic interventions have indicated that probiotics possess a mitigating effect on AD. For example, Saccharomyces boulardii has been shown to alleviate neuroinflammation and synaptic damage by regulating the gut microbiota, inhibiting microglial activation and the TLRs pathway and ameliorating cognitive impairment in AD mice. 165

Clinical trials have demonstrated that probiotics can effectively ameliorate neurological disorders such as depression and autism in rodents by regulating the composition of gut microbiota. However, the complexity of gut microbiota and the difficulty in research methodology have resulted in a paucity of clinical studies on gut microbiota. Furthermore, the mechanisms involved in their metabolism and interactions with each other remain unclear. Additionally, the specificity of probiotic strains, optimal dosage, duration of intervention and other issues vary greatly in preclinical and clinical trials. Consequently, it is imperative to conduct further research and develop new microorganisms with probiotic functions.

5.3. Prebiotics/Synbiotics

Prebiotics are currently defined as ‘a substrate that is selectively used by host microorganisms to confer a health benefit’ and are mainly carbohydrates such as inulin, oligo‐galactose, oligo‐fructose and lacto‐fructose, which stimulate the growth and metabolic activity of probiotics in the gut. 165 For instance, inulin supplementation in mice promotes bifidobacterial and lactobacilli. 166 Furthermore, prebiotic bacterial fermentation generates SCFAs, specifically butyrate, acetate and propionate. 166 Many clinical studies have assessed the impact of prebiotics on alleviating neurological disorders, including AD and PD, although most have concentrated on the beneficial effects of polyunsaturated fatty acids. 167 , 168 , 169 A case in point is the dietary ingestion of omega‐3 fatty acids that might improve cognitive function in mild AD sufferers. 169 Correspondingly, inulin and oligo‐fructose have shown similar results. 168 , 169 , 170

5.4. FMT

Based on the correlation between gut microbiota and neurological disorders, the use of a healthy combination of microbiota in place of a disrupted microbiome may be a potential therapeutic strategy. 171 FMT is a method of restoring gut microbiota homeostasis by transferring faeces (whole gut microbiota) from a healthy donor to the recipient's gastrointestinal tract. FMT has proven to be the foremost method of treatment for relapsing or refractory C. difficile infection and has also been successfully used in gastrointestinal disorders including IBD, IBS, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. 172 Recent research reveals that FMT might also have an effect on neurological disorders by regulating dysregulated gut microbiota. 15 Most relevant studies have concentrated on animal testing, with only a handful of clinical studies on human subjects showcasing FMT potential to effectively treat neurological disorders. Research has revealed that FMT minimizes the formation of amyloid plaques and alleviates cognitive impairment in animal models of AD. 173 Furthermore, a 2018 case study of two ASD patients exhibited significant reduction in symptoms after undergoing FMT treatment. 174 Moreover, similar findings were observed in paediatric patients with ASD, wherein an improvement in both gastrointestinal and behavioural symptoms as well as microbiome diversity were observed. 175

FMT may become a new treatment for CNS illnesses; however, the degree of evidence from existing clinical research is severely lacking, and the selection of transplant donors, standardization of transplant samples, efficacy duration and commencement of action must be examined. Furthermore, the characteristics of gut microbiota abnormalities varies between neurological illnesses, and the presence of disease specificity and personalized transplantation methods requires additional investigation.

6. CONCLUSION

The precise mechanism by which gut microbiota affect neurological illnesses is still unknown because of the complicated etiopathology of neurological disorders, but a substantial body of research has shown a connection between gut microbiota and brain growth and function. Gut microbiome influences brain development and function by changing its composition and variety, as well as the metabolites it produces, via a bidirectional connection between the gut–brain axis. Recent research points to the possibility of treating neurodegenerative illnesses by focusing on flora, but clinical trials are still required to confirm this. Thus, the pursuit of neuromodulator processes that target MGB and interferable gut targets will remain a popular area of study.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Yuhong He: Conceptualization (equal); visualization (equal); writing – original draft (equal). Ke Wang: Data curation (equal); formal analysis (equal); funding acquisition (equal). Niri Su: Investigation (equal); supervision (equal); validation (equal); visualization (equal). Chongshan Yuan: Investigation (equal); validation (equal); visualization (equal). Naisheng Zhang: Funding acquisition (equal); software (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Xiaoyu Hu: Software (equal); supervision (equal); validation (equal). Yunhe Fu: Funding acquisition (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Feng Zhao: Conceptualization (equal); formal analysis (equal); supervision (equal); validation (equal).

FUNDING INFORMATION

The study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32122087, 32102738 and 31972749).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Wencheng Yang and Hengyi Yang for their constructive comments on this paper. Most of the figures in this paper were obtained using Biorender.com.

He Y, Wang K, Su N, et al. Microbiota–gut–brain axis in health and neurological disease: Interactions between gut microbiota and the nervous system. J Cell Mol Med. 2024;28:e70099. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.70099

Yuhong He and Ke Wang contributed equally to this study.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing not applicable ‐ no new data generated, or the article describes entirely theoretical research.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Gomaa EZ. Human gut microbiota/microbiome in health and diseases: a review. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2020;113(12):2019‐2040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Mu CL, Yang YX, Zhu WY. Gut microbiota: the brain peacekeeper. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Fan Y, Pedersen O. Gut microbiota in human metabolic health and disease. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19(1):55‐71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bonaz B, Bazin T, Pellissier S. The Vagus nerve at the Interface of the microbiota‐gut‐brain axis. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Mind‐altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13(10):701‐712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Osadchiy V, Martin CR, Mayer EA. The gut‐brain axis and the microbiome: mechanisms and clinical implications. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(2):322‐332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Li Z, Zhu H, Zhang L, Qin C. The intestinal microbiome and Alzheimer's disease: a review. Animal Model Exp Med. 2018;1(3):180‐188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Stavropoulou E, Bezirtzoglou E. Probiotics in medicine: a Long debate. Front Immunol. 2020;11:2192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Barichella M, Severgnini M, Cilia R, et al. Unraveling gut microbiota in Parkinson's disease and atypical parkinsonism. Mov Disord. 2019;34(3):396‐405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Barandouzi ZA, Starkweather AR, Henderson WA, Gyamfi A, Cong XS. Altered composition of gut microbiota in depression: a systematic review. Front Psych. 2020;11:541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Borsom EM, Lee K, Cope EK. Do the bugs in your gut eat your memories? Relationship between gut microbiota and Alzheimer's disease. Brain Sci. 2020;10(11):814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Hibberd T, Spencer NJ, Brookes S, Costa M, Yew WP. Enteric control of the sympathetic nervous system. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022;1383:89‐103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. De la Fuente M. The role of the microbiota‐gut‐brain Axis in the health and illness condition: a focus on Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;81(4):1345‐1360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Luczynski P, McVey Neufeld KA, Oriach CS, Clarke G, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Growing up in a bubble: using germ‐free animals to assess the influence of the gut microbiota on brain and behavior. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;19(8):pyw020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Suganya K, Koo BS. Gut‐brain axis: role of gut microbiota on neurological disorders and how probiotics/prebiotics beneficially modulate microbial and immune pathways to improve brain functions. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(20):7551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Desbonnet L, Clarke G, Traplin A, et al. Gut microbiota depletion from early adolescence in mice: implications for brain and behaviour. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;48:165‐173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Cryan JF, O'Riordan KJ, Cowan CSM, et al. The microbiota‐gut‐brain Axis. Physiol Rev. 2019;99(4):1877‐2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Al Bander Z, Nitert MD, Mousa A, Naderpoor N. The gut microbiota and inflammation: An overview. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(20):7618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kipnis J. Multifaceted interactions between adaptive immunity and the central nervous system. Science. 2016;353(6301):766‐771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Thion MS, Low D, Silvin A, et al. Microbiome influences prenatal and adult microglia in a sex‐specific manner. Cell. 2018;172(3):500‐516 e16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Ye L, Bae M, Cassilly CD, et al. Enteroendocrine cells sense bacterial tryptophan catabolites to activate enteric and vagal neuronal pathways. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29(2):179‐196.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Reigstad CS, Salmonson CE, Rainey JF, et al. Gut microbes promote colonic serotonin production through an effect of short‐chain fatty acids on enterochromaffin cells. FASEB J. 2015;29(4):1395‐1403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Furness JB, Callaghan BP, Rivera LR, Cho HJ. The enteric nervous system and gastrointestinal innervation: integrated local and central control. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;817:39‐71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Masliukov PM, Emanuilov AI, Budnik AF. Sympathetic innervation of the development, maturity, and aging of the gastrointestinal tract. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2022;306:2249‐2263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Populin L, Stebbing MJ, Furness JB. Neuronal regulation of the gut immune system and neuromodulation for treating inflammatory bowel disease. FASEB Bioadv. 2021;3(11):953‐966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Li ZS, Pham TD, Tamir H, Chen JJ, Gershon MD. Enteric dopaminergic neurons: definition, developmental lineage, and effects of extrinsic denervation. J Neurosci. 2004;24(6):1330‐1339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Niu X, Liu L, Wang T, et al. Mapping of extrinsic innervation of the gastrointestinal tract in the mouse embryo. J Neurosci. 2020;40(35):6691‐6708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Straub RH, Wiest R, Strauch UG, Harle P, Scholmerich J. The role of the sympathetic nervous system in intestinal inflammation. Gut. 2006;55(11):1640‐1649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Li Q, Ren Y, Fu X. Inter‐kingdom signaling between gut microbiota and their host. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019;76(12):2383‐2389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Hausberg M, Hillebrand U, Kisters K. Addressing the relationship between sympathetic activity and inflammation. J Hypertens. 2008;26(12):2276‐2278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Meerschaert KA, Davis BM, Smith‐Edwards KM. New insights on extrinsic innervation of the enteric nervous system and non‐neuronal cell types that influence colon function. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022;1383:133‐139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Guérineau NC. Cholinergic and peptidergic neurotransmission in the adrenal medulla: a dynamic control of stimulus‐secretion coupling. IUBMB Life. 2020;72(4):553‐567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Fried S, Wemelle E, Cani PD, Knauf C. Interactions between the microbiota and enteric nervous system during gut‐brain disorders. Neuropharmacology. 2021;197:108721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Snoek SA, Verstege MI, Boeckxstaens GE, van den Wijngaard RM, de Jonge WJ. The enteric nervous system as a regulator of intestinal epithelial barrier function in health and disease. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;4(5):637‐651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Dicks LMT. Gut bacteria and neurotransmitters. Microorganisms. 2022;10(9):1838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Travagli RA, Anselmi L. Vagal neurocircuitry and its influence on gastric motility. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(7):389‐401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Tischler AS. Chromaffin cells as models of endocrine cells and neurons. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;971:366‐370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Rhee SH, Pothoulakis C, Mayer EA. Principles and clinical implications of the brain‐gut‐enteric microbiota axis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6(5):306‐314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Lund ML, Egerod KL, Engelstoft MS, et al. Enterochromaffin 5‐HT cells—a major target for GLP‐1 and gut microbial metabolites. Mol Metab. 2018;11:70‐83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Bellono NW, Bayrer JR, Leitch DB, et al. Enterochromaffin cells are gut chemosensors that couple to sensory neural pathways. Cell. 2017;170(1):185‐198.e16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Margolis KG, Gershon MD, Bogunovic M. Cellular Organization of Neuroimmune Interactions in the gastrointestinal tract. Trends Immunol. 2016;37(7):487‐501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Gabanyi I, Muller PA, Feighery L, Oliveira TY, Costa‐Pinto FA, Mucida D. Neuro‐immune interactions drive tissue programming in intestinal macrophages. Cell. 2016;164(3):378‐391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Talbot J, Hahn P, Kroehling L, Nguyen H, Li D, Littman DR. Feeding‐dependent VIP neuron‐ILC3 circuit regulates the intestinal barrier. Nature. 2020;579(7800):575‐580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Zhang XY, Guo Z, Li TP, Sun T. Dietary capsaicin normalizes CGRP peptidergic DRG neurons in experimental diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Jarret A, Jackson R, Duizer C, et al. Enteric nervous system‐derived IL‐18 orchestrates mucosal barrier immunity. Cell. 2020;180(1):50‐63.e12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Mashima H, Watanabe N, Sekine M, et al. The role of Gα(q)/Gα(11) signaling in intestinal epithelial cells. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2018;13:93‐98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Yeo XY, Chae WR, Lee HU, et al. Nuanced contribution of gut microbiome in the early brain development of mice. Gut Microbes. 2023;15(2):2283911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Hoban AE, Stilling RM, Ryan FJ, et al. Regulation of prefrontal cortex myelination by the microbiota. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;6:e774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Lu J, Synowiec S, Lu L, et al. Microbiota influence the development of the brain and behaviors in C57BL/6J mice. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0201829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Sharon G, Sampson TR, Geschwind DH, Mazmanian SK. The central nervous system and the gut microbiome. Cell. 2016;167(4):915‐932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Jašarević E, Rodgers AB, Bale TL. A novel role for maternal stress and microbial transmission in early life programming and neurodevelopment. Neurobiol Stress. 2015;1:81‐88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Luczynski P, Whelan SO, O'Sullivan C, et al. Adult microbiota‐deficient mice have distinct dendritic morphological changes: differential effects in the amygdala and hippocampus. Eur J Neurosci. 2016;44(9):2654‐2666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Chen JJ, Zeng BH, Li WW, et al. Effects of gut microbiota on the microRNA and mRNA expression in the hippocampus of mice. Behav Brain Res. 2017;322:34‐41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Sampson TR, Debelius JW, Thron T, et al. Gut microbiota regulate motor deficits and neuroinflammation in a model of Parkinson's disease. Cell. 2016;167(6):1469‐1480 e12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Huang Y, Wu J, Zhang H, et al. The gut microbiome modulates the transformation of microglial subtypes. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28(4):1611‐1621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Erny D, Hrabě de Angelis AL, Jaitin D, et al. Host microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(7):965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Xie JH, Bruggeman A, De Nolf C, et al. Gut microbiota regulates blood‐cerebrospinal fluid barrier function and Aβ pathology. EMBO J. 2023;42(17):e111515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Douglas‐Escobar M, Elliott E, Neu J. Effect of intestinal microbial ecology on the developing brain. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(4):374‐379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Diaz Heijtz R, Wang S, Anuar F, et al. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(7):3047‐3052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Sudo N, Chida Y, Aiba Y, et al. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal system for stress response in mice. J Physiol. 2004;558(Pt 1):263‐275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Lyte M, Li W, Opitz N, Gaykema RP, Goehler LE. Induction of anxiety‐like behavior in mice during the initial stages of infection with the agent of murine colonic hyperplasia Citrobacter rodentium. Physiol Behav. 2006;89(3):350‐357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Zhou B, Jin G, Pang X, et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG colonization in early life regulates gut‐brain axis and relieves anxiety‐like behavior in adulthood. Pharmacol Res. 2022;177:106090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Muller PA, Schneeberger M, Matheis F, et al. Microbiota modulate sympathetic neurons via a gut‐brain circuit. Nature. 2020;583(7816):441‐446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Goehler LE, Park SM, Opitz N, Lyte M, Gaykema RPA. Campylobacter jejuni infection increases anxiety‐like behavior in the holeboard: possible anatomical substrates for viscerosensory modulation of exploratory behavior. Brain Behav Immun. 2008;22(3):354‐366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Bercik P, Park AJ, Sinclair D, et al. The anxiolytic effect of Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 involves vagal pathways for gut‐brain communication. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23(12):1132‐1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Liu Y, Sanderson D, Mian MF, McVey Neufeld KA, Forsythe P. Loss of vagal integrity disrupts immune components of the microbiota‐gut‐brain axis and inhibits the effect of lactobacillus rhamnosus on behavior and the corticosterone stress response. Neuropharmacology. 2021;195:108682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Sgritta M, Dooling SW, Buffington SA, et al. Mechanisms underlying microbial‐mediated changes in social behavior in mouse models of autism spectrum disorder. Neuron. 2019;101(2):246‐259.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Martin AM, Sun EW, Rogers GB, Keating DJ. The influence of the gut microbiome on host metabolism through the regulation of gut hormone release. Front Physiol. 2019;10:428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Collins J, Borojevic R, Verdu EF, Huizinga JD, Ratcliffe EM. Intestinal microbiota influence the early postnatal development of the enteric nervous system. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;26(1):98‐107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Hyland NP, Cryan JF. Microbe‐host interactions: influence of the gut microbiota on the enteric nervous system. Dev Biol. 2016;417(2):182‐187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Kabouridis PS, Lasrado R, McCallum S, et al. The gut microbiota keeps enteric glial cells on the move; prospective roles of the gut epithelium and immune system. Gut Microbes. 2015;6(6):398‐403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Kunze WA, Mao YK, Wang B, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri enhances excitability of colonic AH neurons by inhibiting calcium‐dependent potassium channel opening. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13(8b):2261‐2270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Wang B, Mao YK, Diorio C, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri ingestion and IK(Ca) channel blockade have similar effects on rat colon motility and myenteric neurones. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010;22(1):98‐107, e33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Lesniewska V, Rowland I, Laerke HN, Grant G, Naughton PJ. Relationship between dietary‐induced changes in intestinal commensal microflora and duodenojejunal myoelectric activity monitored by radiotelemetry in the rat in vivo. Exp Physiol. 2006;91(1):229‐237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. De Angelis M, Piccolo M, Vannini L, et al. Fecal microbiota and metabolome of children with autism and pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Capuco A, Urits I, Hasoon J, et al. Gut microbiome Dysbiosis and depression: a comprehensive review. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020;24(7):36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Kundu P, Lee HU, Garcia‐Perez I, et al. Neurogenesis and prolongevity signaling in young germ‐free mice transplanted with the gut microbiota of old mice. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(518):eaau4760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Zheng P, Zeng B, Zhou C, et al. Gut microbiome remodeling induces depressive‐like behaviors through a pathway mediated by the host's metabolism. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21(6):786‐796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Kelly JR, Borre Y, O' Brien C, et al. Transferring the blues: depression‐associated gut microbiota induces neurobehavioural changes in the rat. J Psychiatr Res. 2016;82:109‐118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Xiao L, Yan J, Yang T, et al. Fecal microbiome transplantation from children with autism spectrum disorder modulates tryptophan and serotonergic synapse metabolism and induces altered Behaviors in germ‐free mice. mSystems. 2021;6(2):e01343‐20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Lukić I, Getselter D, Koren O, Elliott E. Role of tryptophan in microbiota‐induced depressive‐like behavior: evidence from tryptophan depletion study. Front Behav Neurosci. 2019;13:123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Horiuchi Y, Kimura R, Kato N, et al. Evolutional study on acetylcholine expression. Life Sci. 2003;72(15):1745‐1756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. O'Donnell MP, Fox BW, Chao PH, Schroeder FC, Sengupta P. A neurotransmitter produced by gut bacteria modulates host sensory behaviour. Nature. 2020;583(7816):415‐420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Koussoulas K, Swaminathan M, Fung C, Bornstein JC, Foong JPP. Neurally released GABA acts via GABA(C) receptors to modulate Ca(2+) transients evoked by Trains of Synaptic Inputs, but not responses evoked by single stimuli, in myenteric neurons of mouse ileum. Front Physiol. 2018;9:97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Strandwitz P, Kim KH, Terekhova D, et al. GABA‐modulating bacteria of the human gut microbiota. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4(3):396‐403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Barrett E, Ross RP, O'Toole PW, Fitzgerald GF, Stanton C. γ‐Aminobutyric acid production by culturable bacteria from the human intestine. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;113(2):411‐417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Pokusaeva K, Johnson C, Luk B, et al. GABA‐producing Bifidobacterium dentium modulates visceral sensitivity in the intestine. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(1):e12904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Cho YR, Chang JY, Chang HC. Production of gamma‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) by lactobacillus buchneri isolated from kimchi and its neuroprotective effect on neuronal cells. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;17(1):104‐109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Siragusa S, de Angelis M, di Cagno R, Rizzello CG, Coda R, Gobbetti M. Synthesis of gamma‐aminobutyric acid by lactic acid bacteria isolated from a variety of Italian cheeses. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(22):7283‐7290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Tsavkelova EA, Botvinko IV, Kudrin VS, Oleskin AV. Detection of neurotransmitter amines in microorganisms with the use of high‐performance liquid chromatography. Dokl Biochem. 2000;372(1–6):115‐117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Shishov VA, Kirovskaia TA, Kudrin VS, Oleskin AV. Amine neuromediators, their precursors, and oxidation products in the culture of Escherichia coli K‐12. Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol. 2009;45(5):550‐554. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Luqman A, Nega M, Nguyen MT, Ebner P, Götz F. SadA‐expressing staphylococci in the human gut show increased cell adherence and internalization. Cell Rep. 2018;22(2):535‐545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Yano JM, Yu K, Donaldson GP, et al. Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis. Cell. 2015;161(2):264‐276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Kim SH, Field KG, Morrissey MT, Price RJ, Wei CI, An H. Source and identification of histamine‐producing bacteria from fresh and temperature‐abused albacore. J Food Prot. 2001;64(7):1035‐1044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Landete JM, Ferrer S, Pardo I. Biogenic amine production by lactic acid bacteria, acetic bacteria and yeast isolated from wine. Food Control. 2007;18(12):1569‐1574. [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Özogul F. Production of biogenic amines by, and using a rapid HPLC method. Eur Food Res Technol. 2004;219(5):465‐469. [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Özogul F, Kuley E, Özogul Y, Ozogul I. The function of lactic acid bacteria on biogenic amines production by food‐borne pathogens in arginine decarboxylase broth. Food Sci Technol Res. 2012;18(6):795‐804. [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Picciotto MR, Higley MJ, Mineur YS. Acetylcholine as a neuromodulator: cholinergic signaling shapes nervous system function and behavior. Neuron. 2012;76(1):116‐129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Lahiri S, Kim H, Garcia‐Perez I, et al. The gut microbiota influences skeletal muscle mass and function in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(502):eaan5662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Lyte M. Microbial endocrinology in the microbiome‐gut‐brain axis: how bacterial production and utilization of neurochemicals influence behavior. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(11):e1003726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Labed SA, Wani KA, Jagadeesan S, Hakkim A, Najibi M, Irazoqui JE. Intestinal epithelial Wnt Signaling mediates acetylcholine‐triggered host Defense against infection. Immunity. 2018;48(5):963‐978.e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Segawa S, Fujiya M, Konishi H, et al. Probiotic‐derived polyphosphate enhances the epithelial barrier function and maintains intestinal homeostasis through integrin‐p38 MAPK pathway. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Ferreira‐Vieira TH, Guimaraes IM, Silva FR, Ribeiro FM. Alzheimer's disease: targeting the cholinergic system. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2016;14(1):101‐115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Zangrossi H Jr, Graeff FG. Serotonin in anxiety and panic: contributions of the elevated T‐maze. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;46(Pt 3):397‐406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Koopman N, Katsavelis D, ten Hove A, Brul S, de Jonge W, Seppen J. The multifaceted role of serotonin in intestinal homeostasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(17):9487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Ge X, Ding C, Zhao W, et al. Antibiotics‐induced depletion of mice microbiota induces changes in host serotonin biosynthesis and intestinal motility. J Transl Med. 2017;15(1):13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Meijerink J. The intestinal fatty acid‐Enteroendocrine interplay, emerging roles for olfactory Signaling and serotonin conjugates. Molecules. 2021;26(5):1416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Abbott NJ. Inflammatory mediators and modulation of blood‐brain barrier permeability. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2000;20(2):131‐147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Sharma A, Castellani RJ, Smith MA, Muresanu DF, Dey PK, Sharma HS. 5‐Hydroxytryptophan: a precursor of serotonin influences regional blood‐brain barrier breakdown, cerebral blood flow, brain edema formation, and neuropathology. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2019;146:1‐44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Han H, Yi B, Zhong R, et al. From gut microbiota to host appetite: gut microbiota‐derived metabolites as key regulators. Microbiome. 2021;9(1):162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Er S, Airavaara M. Protective mechanisms by glial cell line‐derived neurotrophic factor and cerebral dopamine neurotrophic factor against the α‐synuclein accumulation in Parkinson's disease. Biochem Soc Trans. 2023;51:245‐257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Howes O, McCutcheon R, Stone J. Glutamate and dopamine in schizophrenia: an update for the 21st century. J Psychopharmacol. 2015;29(2):97‐115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Bo TB, Zhang XY, Wen J, Deng K, Qin XW, Wang DH. The microbiota‐gut‐brain interaction in regulating host metabolic adaptation to cold in male Brandt's voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii). ISME J. 2019;13(12):3037‐3053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Pasupuleti S, Sule N, Cohn WB, MacKenzie DS, Jayaraman A, Manson MD. Chemotaxis of Escherichia coli to norepinephrine (NE) requires conversion of NE to 3,4‐dihydroxymandelic acid. J Bacteriol. 2014;196(23):3992‐4000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Wen K, Zhao MM, Liu L, et al. Thiamine modulates intestinal morphological structure and microbiota under subacute ruminal acidosis induced by a high‐concentrate diet in Saanen goats. Animal. 2021;15(10):100370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Sharon G, Cruz NJ, Kang DW, et al. Human gut microbiota from autism Spectrum disorder promote Behavioral symptoms in mice. Cell. 2019;177(6):1600‐1618.e17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Borrego‐Ruiz A, Borrego JJ. An updated overview on the relationship between human gut microbiome dysbiosis and psychiatric and psychological disorders. Prog Neuro‐Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2024;128:110861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Borkent J, Ioannou M, Laman JD, Haarman BCM, Sommer IEC. Role of the gut microbiome in three major psychiatric disorders. Psychol Med. 2022;52(7):1222‐1242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Nikolova VL, Smith MRB, Hall LJ, Cleare AJ, Stone JM, Young AH. Perturbations in gut microbiota composition in psychiatric disorders: a review and meta‐analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(12):1343‐1354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Zhuang ZQ, Shen LL, Li WW, et al. Gut microbiota is altered in patients with Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;63(4):1337‐1346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Scheperjans F, Aho V, Pereira PAB, et al. Gut microbiota are related to Parkinson's disease and clinical phenotype. Mov Disord. 2015;30(3):350‐358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Xi J, Ding D, Zhu H, et al. Disturbed microbial ecology in Alzheimer's disease: evidence from the gut microbiota and fecal metabolome. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21(1):226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Nishiwaki H, Ito M, Ishida T, et al. Meta‐analysis of gut Dysbiosis in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2020;35(9):1626‐1635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Sun MF, Shen YQ. Dysbiosis of gut microbiota and microbial metabolites in Parkinson's disease. Ageing Res Rev. 2018;45:53‐61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Yemula N, Dietrich C, Dostal V, Hornberger M. Parkinson's disease and the gut: symptoms, nutrition, and microbiota. J Parkinsons Dis. 2021;11(4):1491‐1505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Dopkins N, Nagarkatti PS, Nagarkatti M. The role of gut microbiome and associated metabolome in the regulation of neuroinflammation in multiple sclerosis and its implications in attenuating chronic inflammation in other inflammatory and autoimmune disorders. Immunology. 2018;154(2):178‐185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Tremlett H, Waubant E. The gut microbiota and Pediatric multiple sclerosis: recent findings. Neurotherapeutics. 2018;15(1):102‐108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Lin P, Ding B, Feng C, et al. Prevotella and Klebsiella proportions in fecal microbial communities are potential characteristic parameters for patients with major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2017;207:300‐304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Hung CC, Chang CC, Huang CW, Nouchi R, Cheng CH. Gut microbiota in patients with Alzheimer's disease spectrum: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Aging (Albany NY). 2022;14(1):477‐496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Pfeiffer RF. Non‐motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;22(Suppl 1):S119‐S122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Singleton AB, Farrer M, Johnson J, et al. Alpha‐Synuclein locus triplication causes Parkinson's disease. Science. 2003;302(5646):841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Holmqvist S, Chutna O, Bousset L, et al. Direct evidence of Parkinson pathology spread from the gastrointestinal tract to the brain in rats. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;128(6):805‐820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Elfil M, Kamel S, Kandil M, Koo BB, Schaefer SM. Implications of the gut microbiome in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2020;35(6):921‐933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Nielsen SD, Pearson NM, Seidler K. The link between the gut microbiota and Parkinson's disease: a systematic mechanism review with focus on α‐synuclein transport. Brain Res. 2021;1769:147609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Ristori MV, Quagliariello A, Reddel S, et al. Autism, gastrointestinal symptoms and modulation of gut microbiota by nutritional interventions. Nutrients. 2019;11(11):2812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. De Angelis M, Francavilla R, Piccolo M, De Giacomo A, Gobbetti M. Autism spectrum disorders and intestinal microbiota. Gut Microbes. 2015;6(3):207‐213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Sandler RH, Finegold SM, Bolte ER, et al. Short‐term benefit from oral vancomycin treatment of regressive‐onset autism. J Child Neurol. 2000;15(7):429‐435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Yap CX, Henders AK, Alvares GA, et al. Autism‐related dietary preferences mediate autism‐gut microbiome associations. Cell. 2021;184(24):5916‐5931.e17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Simpson CA, Diaz‐Arteche C, Eliby D, Schwartz OS, Simmons JG, Cowan CSM. The gut microbiota in anxiety and depression—a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2021;83:101943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Zheng P, Yang J, Li Y, et al. Gut microbial signatures can discriminate unipolar from bipolar depression. Advanced. Science. 2020;7(7):1902862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Zhang YY, Fan Q, Hou Y, et al. Species differentially modulate depression‐like behavior via gut‐brain metabolic signaling. Brain Behav Immun. 2022;102:11‐22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Caspani G, Kennedy S, Foster JA, Swann J. Gut microbial metabolites in depression: understanding the biochemical mechanisms. Microbial Cell. 2019;6(10):454‐481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Wang D, Jiang X, Zhu H, et al. Relationships between the gut microbiome and brain functional alterations in first‐episode, drug‐naïve patients with major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2024;362:578‐584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Menke A. The HPA Axis as target for depression. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2024;22(5):904‐915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Ge T, Yao X, Zhao H, et al. Gut microbiota and neuropsychiatric disorders: implications for neuroendocrine‐immune regulation. Pharmacol Res. 2021;173:105909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Kalueff AV, Nutt DJ. Role of GABA in anxiety and depression. Depress Anxiety. 2007;24(7):495‐517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Khalil M, Azouz HG, Ahmed SAS, Gad HA, Omar OM. Sensory processing and gastrointestinal manifestations in autism Spectrum disorders: No relation to Clostridium difficile. J Mol Neurosci. 2021;71(1):153‐161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Foster JA, McVey Neufeld KA. Gut‐brain axis: how the microbiome influences anxiety and depression. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36(5):305‐312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Metta V, Leta V, Mrudula KR, et al. Gastrointestinal dysfunction in Parkinson's disease: molecular pathology and implications of gut microbiome, probiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation. J Neurol. 2022;269(3):1154‐1163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Warnecke T, Schäfer KH, Claus I, del Tredici K, Jost WH. Gastrointestinal involvement in Parkinson's disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2022;8(1):31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Fasano A, Visanji NP, Liu LWC, Lang AE, Pfeiffer RF. Gastrointestinal dysfunction in Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(6):625‐639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Cunnane SC, Trushina E, Morland C, et al. Brain energy rescue: an emerging therapeutic concept for neurodegenerative disorders of ageing. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19(9):609‐633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Clairembault T, Kamphuis W, Leclair‐Visonneau L, et al. Enteric GFAP expression and phosphorylation in Parkinson's disease. J Neurochem. 2014;130(6):805‐815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Keshavarzian A, Green SJ, Engen PA, et al. Colonic bacterial composition in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2015;30(10):1351‐1360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Cirstea MS, Yu AC, Golz E, et al. Microbiota composition and metabolism are associated with gut function in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2020;35(7):1208‐1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Zhu TB, Zhang Z, Luo P, et al. Lipid metabolism in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Res Bull. 2019;144:68‐74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Tan BL, Norhaizan ME. Effect of high‐fat diets on oxidative stress, cellular inflammatory response and cognitive function. Nutrients. 2019;11(11):2579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Shi HL, Wang Q, Zheng M, et al. Supplement of microbiota‐accessible carbohydrates prevents neuroinflammation and cognitive decline by improving the gut microbiota‐brain axis in diet‐induced obese mice. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17(1):77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. De Filippis F, Pellegrini N, Vannini L, et al. High‐level adherence to a Mediterranean diet beneficially impacts the gut microbiota and associated metabolome. Gut. 2016;65(11):1812‐1821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Newell C, Bomhof MR, Reimer RA, Hittel DS, Rho JM, Shearer J. Ketogenic diet modifies the gut microbiota in a murine model of autism spectrum disorder. Mol Autism. 2016;7(1):37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Swidsinski A, Dörffel Y, Loening‐Baucke V, et al. Reduced mass and diversity of the colonic microbiome in patients with multiple sclerosis and their improvement with ketogenic diet. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Kolodziejczyk AA, Zheng D, Elinav E. Diet‐microbiota interactions and personalized nutrition. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17(12):742‐753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Olvera‐Rosales LB, Cruz‐Guerrero AE, Ramírez‐Moreno E, et al. Impact of the gut microbiota balance on the health‐disease relationship: the importance of consuming probiotics and prebiotics. Food Secur. 2021;10(6):1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Bonfili L, Cecarini V, Berardi S, et al. Microbiota modulation counteracts Alzheimer's disease progression influencing neuronal proteolysis and gut hormones plasma levels. Sci Rep. 2017;7:2426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Ye T, Yuan S, Kong Y, et al. Effect of probiotic fungi against cognitive impairment in mice via regulation of the fungal microbiota‐gut‐brain axis. J Agric Food Chem. 2022;70:9026‐9038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Guarino MPL, Altomare A, Emerenziani S, et al. Mechanisms of action of prebiotics and their effects on gastro‐intestinal disorders in adults. Nutrients. 2020;12(4):1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Badesso S, Cartas‐Cejudo P, Espelosin M, Santamaria E, Cuadrado‐Tejedor M, Garcia‐Osta A. Docosahexaenoic acid ameliorates contextual fear memory deficits in the Tg2576 Alzheimer's disease mouse model: cellular and molecular correlates. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(1):82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Bie NN, Li J, Li C, Lian R, Qin L, Wang C. Protective effect and mechanism of docosahexaenoic acid on the cognitive function in female APP/PS1 mice. Food Funct. 2021;12(22):11435‐11448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Calon F, Lim GP, Yang F, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid protects from dendritic pathology in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model. Neuron. 2004;43(5):633‐645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Park YH, Shin SJ, Kim H, et al. Omega‐3 fatty acid‐type docosahexaenoic acid protects against Aβ‐mediated mitochondrial deficits and pathomechanisms in Alzheimer's disease‐related animal model. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(11):3879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. de Groot PF, Frissen MN, de Clercq NC, Nieuwdorp M. Fecal microbiota transplantation in metabolic syndrome: history, present and future. Gut Microbes. 2017;8(3):253‐267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Boicean A, Bratu D, Fleaca SR, et al. Exploring the potential of Fecal microbiota transplantation as a therapy in tuberculosis and inflammatory bowel disease. Pathogens. 2023;12(9):1149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Kim MS, Kim Y, Choi H, et al. Transfer of a healthy microbiota reduces amyloid and tau pathology in an Alzheimer's disease animal model. Gut. 2020;69(2):283‐294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Tierney BT, Yang Z, Luber JM, et al. The landscape of genetic content in the gut and oral human microbiome. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;26(2):283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Kang DW, Adams JB, Gregory AC, et al. Microbiota transfer therapy alters gut ecosystem and improves gastrointestinal and autism symptoms: an open‐label study. Microbiome. 2017;5:10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable ‐ no new data generated, or the article describes entirely theoretical research.


Articles from Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES