Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2024 Sep 18;14:21806. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62026-x

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© The Author(s) 2024

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

PMC Copyright notice

Comparison of the degree of corneal opacity and neovascularization (NV) in the injured and treated groups following a clinical grading system. (A) Representative slit-lamp images showing differences in corneal opacity and NV among the five different groups on day 7 after alkali burn. (B, C) Quantification of the grade in corneal opacity (B) and NV (C) of each group. All assessment were evaluated by blind-review at least six rats in each group. All values are represented as the mean ± SEM (ns: not significant, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001). Statistical significance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc comparison between groups.