Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 4;54(9):1965–1974. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724000059

Table 5.

Results of correlations between visual working memory capacity (Pashler's K) and mean Cowan's K of each target condition

Statistic p
HCS (n = 74)
Flickering-bias/predictive cue rs = 0.318 0.006**
Flickering-bias/non-predictive cue rs = 0.480 < 0.001***
Non-flickering-bias/predictive cue rs = 0.289 0.013*
Non-flickering-bias/non-predictive cue rs = 0.293 0.011*
PSZ (n = 66)
Flickering-bias/predictive cue rs = 0.225 0.070
Flickering-bias/non-predictive cue rs = 0.243 0.049*
Non-flickering-bias/predictive cue rs = 0.238 0.055
Non-flickering-bias/non-predictive cue rs = 0.281 0.023*
Fisher z transformation
Flickering-bias/predictive cue z = 0.581 0.281
Flickering-bias/non-predictive cue z = 1.589 0.056
Non-flickering-bias/predictive cue z = 0.317 0.376
Non-flickering-bias/non-predictive cue z = 0.076 0.470

Abbreviations: HCS = healthy control subjects; PSZ = people with schizophrenia. Asterisks indicate significance p < 0.001 = ***, p < 0.01 = **, p < 0.05 = *. The non-significant z scores indicate no significant differences between groups of the correlations of VWM capacity and mean target Cowan's K in each condition.