Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 9;15(17):5762–5772. doi: 10.7150/jca.99610

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for overall survival of gastric cancer patients.

Predictor Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Age, years
≥65 vs <65 1.356(0.903-2.036) 0.142
Gender
Female vs Male 1.376(0.910-2.081) 0.130
Size, cm
>4cm vs ≤4cm 1.629(1.054-2.516) 0.028* 1.409(0.908-2.185) 0.126
Tumor location
Middle 1/3 vs Upper 1/3 1.336(0.635-2.812) 0.445
Lower 1/3 vs Upper 1/3 0.859(0.479-1.539) 0.609
More than 2/3 stomach vs Upper 1/3 1.097(0.563-2.137) 0.785
Tumor stage (depth of invasion)
T3-T4 vs T1-T2 0.791(0.366-1.711) 0.552
Lymph node metastasis
Positive vs Negative 2.228(1.332-3.728) 0.002** 1.835(1.082-3.112) 0.024*
TNM stage
II vs I 0.815(0.240-2.774) 0.744
III vs I 1.833(0.577-5.824) 0.304
Lauren type
Diffuse vs Intestinal 1.004(0.623-1.617) 0.988
Expression of SCAMP1
High vs Low 1.919(1.219-3.021) 0.005** 1.638(1.033-2.597) 0.036*

HR, Hazard Ratio. pTNM stage is defined using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging System, 8th Edition. Asterisks stand for P values as follows: *, P < 0.05; **; P < 0.01.