Table 4.
The Relative Risk for NAFLD by Logistic Regression Analysis
| Variables | B | SE | Wals | P | OR | 95.0% CI for OR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| METS-IR | 0.113 | 0.018 | 38.255 | < 0.001 | 1.120 | 1.080–1.161 |
| TC | 0.295 | 0.089 | 11.082 | 0.001 | 1.343 | 1.129–1.599 |
| DBP | 0.024 | 0.010 | 5.615 | 0.018 | 1.024 | 1.004–1.044 |
| VFA | 0.011 | 0.003 | 10.817 | 0.001 | 1.011 | 1.005–1.018 |
| UA | 0.003 | 0.001 | 6.078 | 0.014 | 1.003 | 1.001–1.005 |
| Diabetes duration | −0.034 | 0.016 | 4.776 | 0.029 | 0.967 | 0.937–0.996 |
Abbreviations: METS-IR, metabolic score for IR; TC, total cholesterol; VFA, visceral fat area; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; UA, uric acid; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; OR, odd ratio.