Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1988 Aug;41(8):841–846. doi: 10.1136/jcp.41.8.841

Representative sample of rheumatoid synovium: a morphometric study.

T D Kennedy 1, C Plater-Zyberk 1, T A Partridge 1, D F Woodrow 1, R N Maini 1
PMCID: PMC1141613  PMID: 3170771

Abstract

The synovium from 11 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, who were undergoing joint surgery, was assessed using histological and morphometric techniques. Histological examination confirmed previous reports that the intensity of the cellular reaction varied throughout the synovium, and the morphometric method reflected this variability sensitively. The method was shown to be reproducible and allowed areas of similar cellular density to be defined. From these defined areas a total of 2.5 mm2 of synovium equivalent to 12 fields at x250 required analysis to reflect the variation in the cellular reaction. It would be feasible to collect this amount of material using an arthroscope.

Full text

PDF
842

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aherne W. A., Diggle P. J. The estimation of neuronal population density by a robust distance method. J Microsc. 1978 Dec;114(3):285–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1978.tb00138.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CRUICKSHANK B. Interpretation of multiple biopsies of synovial tissue in rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 1952 Jun;11(2):137–145. doi: 10.1136/ard.11.2.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooper N. S., Soren A., McEwen C., Rosenberger J. L. Diagnostic specificity of synovial lesions. Hum Pathol. 1981 Apr;12(4):314–328. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(81)80141-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gardner M. J., Altman D. G. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Mar 15;292(6522):746–750. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6522.746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibson T., Fagg N., Highton J., Wilton M., Dyson M. The diagnostic value of synovial biopsy in patients with arthritis of unknown cause. Br J Rheumatol. 1985 Aug;24(3):232–241. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/24.3.232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Henderson D. R., Jayson M. I., Tribe C. R. Lack of correlation of synovial histology with joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1975 Feb;34(1):7–11. doi: 10.1136/ard.34.1.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hutton C. W., Hinton C., Dieppe P. A. Intra-articular variation of synovial changes in knee arthritis: biopsy study comparing changes in patellofemoral synovium and the medial tibiofemoral synovium. Br J Rheumatol. 1987 Feb;26(1):5–8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/26.1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Janossy G., Panayi G., Duke O., Bofill M., Poulter L. W., Goldstein G. Rheumatoid arthritis: a disease of T-lymphocyte/macrophage immunoregulation. Lancet. 1981 Oct 17;2(8251):839–842. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)91107-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jayson M. I., Dixon A. S. Arthroscopy of the knee in rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 1968 Nov;27(6):503–511. doi: 10.1136/ard.27.6.503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Johnell O., Hulth A., Henricson A. T-lymphocyte subsets and HLA-DR-expressing cells in the osteoarthritic synovialis. Scand J Rheumatol. 1985;14(3):259–264. doi: 10.3109/03009748509100403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lindblad S., Hedfors E. Intraarticular variation in synovitis. Local macroscopic and microscopic signs of inflammatory activity are significantly correlated. Arthritis Rheum. 1985 Sep;28(9):977–986. doi: 10.1002/art.1780280904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Meijer C. J., de Graaff-Reitsma C. B., Lafeber G. J., Cats A. In situ localization of lymphocyte subsets in synovial membranes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with monoclonal antibodies. J Rheumatol. 1982 May-Jun;9(3):359–365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Muirden K. D., Mills K. W. Do lymphocytes protect the rheumatoid joint? Br Med J. 1971 Oct 23;4(5781):219–221. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5781.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. ROPES M. W., BENNETT G. A., COBB S., JACOX R., JESSAR R. A. 1958 Revision of diagnostic criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Bull Rheum Dis. 1958 Dec;9(4):175–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rosenberger J. L., Cooper N. S., Soren A., McEwen C. A statistical approach to the histopathologic diagnosis of synovitis. Hum Pathol. 1981 Apr;12(4):329–337. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(81)80142-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vernon-Roberts B. Synovial pathophysiology--diagnostic features and their standardisation. Aust N Z J Med. 1978;8 (Suppl 1):16–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1978.tb04776.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Walters M. T., Smith J. L., Moore K., Evans P. R., Cawley M. I. An investigation of the action of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs on the rheumatoid synovial membrane: reduction in T lymphocyte subpopulations and HLA-DP and DQ antigen expression after gold or penicillamine therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 1987 Jan;46(1):7–16. doi: 10.1136/ard.46.1.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yates D. B., Scott J. T. Rheumatoid synovitis and joint disease. Relationship between arthroscopic and histological changes. Ann Rheum Dis. 1975 Feb;34(1):1–6. doi: 10.1136/ard.34.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ziff M. Immunopathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1982;5(4):469–477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES