Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 9;6:1400615. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2024.1400615

Table 2.

Procedural description, examples, and trade-offs among classes of structural brain preservation methods.

Method Procedure Upsides Downsides
Unprotected cryopreservation
  • Sub-zero cooling of brain tissue in the absence of cryoprotectants

  • Variations: cooling rate, storage temperature

  • Ex: (51)

  • Widely available initial preservation procedure

  • Biomolecule distributions will be altered, but minimal direct chemical changes

  • Inevitable ice damage causes morphologic artifacts

  • Any unplanned rewarming would damage cell morphology

  • Long-term storage requires significant cost

Cryopreservation with CPAs
  • Cryoprotectants perfused during cooling, potentially allowing vitrification

  • Variations: CPAs used, cooling rate

  • Ex: (52)

  • After CPAs are removed, tissue microstructure looks intact

  • CPAs tend to minimally alter biomolecules

  • Plausibly on the shortest path to suspended animation

  • Cryoprotectant toxicity

  • Relies on high-quality perfusion to avoid ice damage, which can be challenging postmortem

  • Long-term storage requires significant cost

Fixation and cryopreservation
  • Chemical fixation and subsequent CPA-based cryopreservation

  • Variations: CPAs perfused or immersed

  • Ex: (53)

  • Connectome preservation by vitrification after fixation shown in mammals (Brain Preservation Foundation, 2018)

  • Fallback of chemical preservation if low temperature storage fails

  • Can be reliant on perfusion quality

  • Long-term storage requires significant cost

  • Reversing crosslinks is well beyond our current technology (also applies to all methods below)

Fluid preservation
  • Fixation, then long-term storage in a liquid preservative solution

  • Variations: fixation method, chemicals used, storage temperature

  • Ex: (54)

  • Simple and inexpensive

  • Widely used with a large infrastructure in place

  • Appears to retain morphology and classes of biomolecules for decades

  • Chemical reactions over time will alter biomolecules

  • Some degree of loss of biomolecules that are not directly crosslinked

  • Possible storage artifacts

Polymer embedding
  • Fixation, then processing and embedding

  • Variations: paraffin, epoxy, polyester, etc. for embedding

  • Ex: (55)

  • Can have excellent ultrastructural preservation

  • Minimal chemical reactions occur during storage

  • Biomolecular extraction during embedding procedures

  • Challenging to perform on human brain scale without sectioning first

  • Can be expensive

CPA, cryoprotective agent; Ex, example.