Unprotected cryopreservation |
-
•
Sub-zero cooling of brain tissue in the absence of cryoprotectants
-
•
Variations: cooling rate, storage temperature
-
•
Ex: (51)
|
-
•
Widely available initial preservation procedure
-
•
Biomolecule distributions will be altered, but minimal direct chemical changes
|
-
•
Inevitable ice damage causes morphologic artifacts
-
•
Any unplanned rewarming would damage cell morphology
-
•
Long-term storage requires significant cost
|
Cryopreservation with CPAs |
-
•
Cryoprotectants perfused during cooling, potentially allowing vitrification
-
•
Variations: CPAs used, cooling rate
-
•
Ex: (52)
|
-
•
After CPAs are removed, tissue microstructure looks intact
-
•
CPAs tend to minimally alter biomolecules
-
•
Plausibly on the shortest path to suspended animation
|
-
•
Cryoprotectant toxicity
-
•
Relies on high-quality perfusion to avoid ice damage, which can be challenging postmortem
-
•
Long-term storage requires significant cost
|
Fixation and cryopreservation |
|
-
•
Connectome preservation by vitrification after fixation shown in mammals (Brain Preservation Foundation, 2018)
-
•
Fallback of chemical preservation if low temperature storage fails
|
-
•
Can be reliant on perfusion quality
-
•
Long-term storage requires significant cost
-
•
Reversing crosslinks is well beyond our current technology (also applies to all methods below)
|
Fluid preservation |
-
•
Fixation, then long-term storage in a liquid preservative solution
-
•
Variations: fixation method, chemicals used, storage temperature
-
•
Ex: (54)
|
|
-
•
Chemical reactions over time will alter biomolecules
-
•
Some degree of loss of biomolecules that are not directly crosslinked
-
•
Possible storage artifacts
|
Polymer embedding |
-
•
Fixation, then processing and embedding
-
•
Variations: paraffin, epoxy, polyester, etc. for embedding
-
•
Ex: (55)
|
|
|