Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 6;37(4):697–708. doi: 10.1007/s10334-024-01192-5

Table 1.

Summary of subjects included, sorted by centre, field strength, design, and treatment

Substudy Centre Field strength (T) Nsubjects / group Baseline (Day 1) Follow-up
(Day 2)
Study date Study type
1 D 4.7 3 Saline Saline July 2018 P
2 E 7 3 Saline Saline Sept. 2018 P
3 G 7 3 Saline Saline July 2018 P
4 G 4.7 4 Saline Saline Sept. 2019 P
1 D 4.7 3 Saline Rifampicin July 2018 P
2 E 7 3 Saline Rifampicin Sept. 2018 P
3 G 7 3 Saline Rifampicin July 2018 P
4 G 4.7 4 Saline Rifampicin Sept. 2019 P
5 E 7 6 Vehicle Sept. 2019 R
6 E 7 6 Vehicle Oct. 2019 R
7 D 4.7 6 Vehicle Sept. 2019 R
8 G 4.7 6 Vehicle Nov. 2019 R
9 G 7 4 Vehicle Oct. 2019 R
10 G 7 6 Vehicle May 2019 R
11 G 7 6 Vehicle Nov. 2019 R
12 G 4.7 4 Saline Sept. 2019 R
13 G 7 3a Saline Sept. 2019 P
13 G 7 3b Saline Sept. 2019 P
13 G 4.7 3a Saline Sept. 2019 P
13 G 4.7 3b Saline Sept. 2019 P

Follow-up treatments on Day 2 for substudies 5–12 are beyond the scope of this paper. Substudies 1–4 have been duplicated to differentiate between those treated with saline at follow-up and those with rifampicin

aThese subjects were imaged by the same centre using 7T at baseline and 4.7T at follow-up

bThese subjects were imaged by the same centre using 4.7T at baseline and 7T at follow-up

P = prospective; R = retrospective