Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Meas. 2019 Jun 4;40(5):055002. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab17f0

Table 2:

Test performances on individual fold of the MIT-BIH database with Paul wavelet at 3.5-second window size

K-th fold TP FP FN TN Acc(%) Se(%) Sp(%) PPV(%) F1(%)

1 406 193 247 8278 95.18 62.17 97.72 67.78 64.86
2 278 70 39 7350 98.59 87.70 99.06 79.89 83.61
3 807 44 131 9960 98.40 86.03 99.56 94.83 90.22
4 368 12 122 10634 98.80 75.10 99.89 96.84 84.60
5 542 9 47 8365 99.38 92.02 99.89 98.37 95.09
6 755 2 72 8480 99.21 91.29 99.98 99.74 95.33
7 527 195 315 13641 96.53 62.59 98.59 72.99 67.39
8 578 9 153 7811 98.11 79.07 99.88 98.47 87.71
9 958 235 30 7884 97.09 96.96 97.11 80.30 87.85
10 555 62 60 10148 98.87 90.24 99.39 89.95 90.10