Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Health Behav. 2023 Apr 30;47(2):337–348. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.47.2.13

Table 4.

Mediation Analysis of the Direct and Indirect Effects of Sex, Intervention Engagement, and Principal Components 2 (Disease Risk) on Percent Weight Loss Following Intervention Session 4

Effect Estimate SE Z p-value 95% Lower CI 95% Upper CI

Principal component 2 (disease risk) and sex 0.699 0.202 3.457 .001 0.300 1.098
Self-monitoring dietary intake and sex 0.014 0.084 0.166 .868 −0.151 0.177
Self-monitoring dietary intake and principal component 2 0.055 0.027 2.011 .044 0.000 0.108
Percent weight loss and principal component 2 0.088 0.086 1.019 .308 −0.080 0.255
Percent weight loss and self-monitoring dietary intake 0.900 0.212 4.253 < .001 0.478 1.309
Percent weight loss and sex −0.687 0.248 −2.766 .006 −1.166 −0.198
Indirect path 0.035 0.024 1.411 .158 0.000 0.095
Direct path −0.687 0.248 −2.766 .006 −1.166 −0.198
Total effect −0.652 0.253 −2.575 .010 −1.141 −0.149
Mediation through principal component 2 0.061 0.065 0.947 .343 −0.056 0.202
Mediation through self-monitoring dietary intake 0.013 0.078 0.161 .872 −0.146 0.167