Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 24;9(3):751–762. doi: 10.1177/23969873241234436

Table 4.

Calibration and overall performance of model A, B, and C.

Without biomarkers +NfL +GFAP +NfL and GFAP
Model A
Emax 0.06 [0.04; 0.34] 0.07 [0.04; 0.24] 0.07 [0.04; 0.25] 0.08 [0.04; 0.21]
Eavg 0.02 [0.01; 0.05] 0.02 [0.01; 0.06] 0.03 [0.01; 0.07] 0.03 [0.01; 0.05]
Brier Score 0.08 [−0.07; 0.25] 0.28 [0.16; 0.47] 0.33 [0.19; 0.52] 0.38 [0.24; 0.57]
R2 0.11 [0.04; 0.24] 0.36 [0.23; 0.54] 0.41 [0.28; 0.58] 0.47 [0.35; 0.64]
Model B
Emax 0.05 [0.03; 0.26] 0.05 [0.03; 0.25] 0.13 [0.06; 0.25] 0.12 [0.05; 0.23]
Eavg 0.01 [0.01; 0.05] 0.01 [0.01; 0.05] 0.05 [0.02; 0.08] 0.03 [0.01; 0.06]
Brier Score 0.19 [0.05; 0.36] 0.32 [0.19; 0.53] 0.37 [0.20; 0.56] 0.39 [0.27; 0.60]
R2 0.27 [0.16; 0.43] 0.41 [0.30; 0.60] 0.43 [0.29; 0.61] 0.48 [0.38; 0.66]
Model C
Emax 0.03 [0.04; 0.29] 0.08 [0.04; 0.26] 0.08 [0.04; 0.21] 0.11 [0.04; 0.23]
Eavg 0.01 [0.01; 0.06] 0.03 [0.01; 0.06] 0.04 [0.01; 0.06] 0.03 [0.01; 0.06]
Brier Score 0.12 [−0.02; 0.32] 0.30 [0.17; 0.50] 0.32 [0.17; 0.52] 0.37 [0.24; 0.58]
R2 0.18 [0.09; 0.34] 0.38 [0.24; 0.57] 0.41 [0.27; 0.58] 0.47 [0.37; 0.64]