Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2024 Sep 11:rs.3.rs-4920639. [Version 1] doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4920639/v1

Table 1.

Structural equation model (SEM) result for songs (N = 164).

Response variable Predictor variable Estimate SE z p
beauty empathy 0.37 0.03 13.01 < 0.001 ***
beauty perceived happiness 0.46 0.02 21.23 < 0.001 ***
beauty perceived sadness 0.51 0.02 23.28 < 0.001 ***
beauty felt happiness 0.00 0.01 −0.06 0.956
beauty felt sadness −0.01 0.01 −0.83 0.407
beauty stimulus duration 0.01 0.00 3.04 0.002 **
beauty empathy * perceived happiness 0.04 0.01 4.62 < 0.001 ***
beauty empathy * perceived sadness 0.06 0.01 5.11 < 0.001 ***
beauty empathy * felt happiness 0.06 0.01 4.83 < 0.001 ***
beauty empathy * felt sadness 0.00 0.02 0.20 0.845
perceived happiness empathy 0.26 0.05 5.06 < 0.001 ***
perceived sadness empathy 0.27 0.05 5.62 < 0.001 ***
felt happiness empathy 0.18 0.01 26.49 < 0.001 ***
felt sadness empathy 0.15 0.01 13.48 < 0.001 ***

The model explains 49% of song beauty variance. Bold values indicate statistical significance. Interaction factors are highlighted in gray. All measures are mean-centered on a 10-point Likert scale.

*

p < 0.05

**

p < 0.01

***

p < 0.001.