Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2024 Sep 11:rs.3.rs-4920639. [Version 1] doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4920639/v1

Table 2.

Structural equation model result for images (N = 164).

Response variable Predictor variable Estimate SE z p
beauty empathy 0.27 0.03 8.43 < 0.001 ***
beauty perceived happiness 0.58 0.04 15.72 < 0.001 ***
beauty perceived sadness 0.12 0.04 3.12 0.002 **
beauty felt happiness −0.06 0.02 −3.52 < 0.001 ***
beauty felt sadness −0.03 0.01 −2.69 0.007 **
beauty stimulus duration 0.01 0.00 2.20 0.028 *
beauty empathy * perceived happiness −0.01 0.01 −0.92 0.355
beauty empathy * perceived sadness 0.01 0.02 0.55 0.584
beauty empathy * felt happiness 0.06 0.01 5.05 < 0.001 ***
beauty empathy * felt sadness 0.06 0.02 2.83 0.005 **
perceived happiness empathy 0.26 0.06 4.33 < 0.001 ***
perceived sadness empathy 0.10 0.07 1.51 0.132
felt happiness empathy 0.19 0.01 23.58 < 0.001 ***
felt sadness empathy 0.15 0.02 8.63 < 0.001 ***

The model explains 43% of image beauty variance. Bold values indicate statistical significance. Interaction factors are highlighted in gray.

*

p < 0.05

**

p < 0.01

***

p < 0.001.