Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 30;58(3):883–902. doi: 10.1007/s10579-023-09718-4

Table 1.

Overview of the most widely used datasets and comparative benefits of our new proposed multimodal longitudinal dataset

Dataset Population Samples Modality Longitudinal Elicitation Duration Task
DementiaBank (Becker et al., 1994) 196 Dem vs. 98 Ctrl 255 Dem vs. 244 Ctrl Audio 1–5 sessions CTP Description 1.90 AD Class, Score Reg
Carolinas(Pope & Davis, 2011) 125 Dem vs 125 Ctrl 400 Dem Vs 250 Ctrl Text+Audio+Video 1–9 sessions Health and Well-being Conversations 76.14 AD Class, Detection of Confusion
ADReSS(Luz et al., 2020) 78 Dem vs. 78 Ctrl 78 Dem vs. 78 Ctrl Text+Audio No CTP Description 1.20 AD Class, Score Reg
ADReSSo(1) (Luz et al., 2021) 32 Dem 105 Audio No Picture Description 2.17 Disease Progression
ADReSSo(2) (Luz et al., 2021) 36 Dem vs. 35 Ctrl 237 Audio No Picture Description 2.21 AD Class, Score Reg
Carers’ interactions with dementia patients (Hansebo & Kihlgren, 2002) 14 Dem 14 Dem Text+Video No Video-recorded Interactions Qualitative Analysis
ILSE (Weiner et al., 2016) 23 Dem 112 hours recording Text+Audio 1-4 sessions Recorded Interactions Disease Progression
Verbal fluency and brain imaging scores (Clark et al., 2016) 107 Dem vs. 51 Ctrl - Text+MRI scores 1-4 sessions Recorded Interactions Disease Progression
Our data collection 14 Dem vs. 8 Ctrl 408 Dem vs. 408 Ctrl Audio+Text+Keyboard+Pen 56 sessions Reminiscence Materials 12.25 Longitudinal Language Changes

Elicitation data elicitation task, Duration average speech duration of the elicited task in minutes, CTP cookie theft picture, Dem participants with dementia, Ctrl participants with no dementia diagnosis, AD Class Alzheimer’s dementia classification. Score Reg score regression

Conversations, Monologue speech, Occasional interactions between clinicians and participants