Table 3.1.
New castle Ottawa Scale for quality assessment of cohort studies.
Study ID | Agunbiade et al. (2022) 34 | Hazra et al. (2022) | Merad et al. (2022) 27 | Morales et al. (2023) 18 | Payne et al. (2022) 32 | Sagy et al. (2023) 17 | Thy et al. (2023) 35 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Representativeness of the exposed cohort | |||||||
Selection of the non exposed cohort | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ |
Ascertainment of exposure | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ |
Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ |
Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis | ★★ | ★ | ★ | ★★ | ★★ | ||
Assessment of outcome | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ |
Was follow‐up long enough for outcomes to occur | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ |
Adequacy of follow up of cohorts | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ |