Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 10;8(18):4913–4923. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013126

Table 3.

Effect of standardized plasma DOAC levels on bleeding outcomes, adjusted for potential confounders

Characteristic First model (C-trough), n = 1657
Second model (C-peak), n = 1298
HR 95% CI HR 95% CI
Standardized C-trough DOAC levels, first 3 mo 1.36 1.02-1.78 - -
Standardized C-trough DOAC levels, >3 mo 0.97 0.66-1.45 - -
Standardized C-peak DOAC levels, first 3 mo - - 1.10 0.70-1.74
Standardized C-peak DOAC levels, >3 mo - - 0.71 0.45-1-13
HAS-BLED score 1.04 0.66-1.62 1.14 0.67-1.96
BMI, kg/m2 1.00 0.93-1.06 1.00 0.93-1.07
Glomerular filtration rate, mL/min 1.00 0.99-1.02 1.01 0.99-1.02
Low- vs standard-dose DOAC, first 3 mo 3.61 1.28-10.2 3.30 1.6-10.3
Low- vs standard-dose DOAC, >3 mo 1.40 0.61-3.23 2.17 0.82-5.74
Antiplatelet treatment (yes vs no) 1.06 0.66-1.62 1.23 0.51-3.00

Both models were estimated using time-varying Cox regression. The inclusion of enrollment center as a potential confounder was not significant (P > .9 for both models) and it is not reported because it did not materially change estimates.

BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.