Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 24;22(9):e3002772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002772

Table 4. Results of test sessions 1 and 2.

Group: all INA DOPA SUL Group effect
Test session 1 (day 2)
EXPECT score preT1 (0–10) 6.5 ± 0.2 6.8 ± 0.3 6.6 ± 0.2 6.1 ± 0.3 F = 1.69, p = 0.19, ηp2 = 0.02
EXPECT score change from preCOND to preT1 0.7 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.2 0.8 ± 0.3 0.5 ± 0.3 F = 0.38, p = 0.68, ηp2 = 0.01
EFFECT score (0–10) 4.4 ± 0.2 4.9 ± 0.3 4.4 ± 0.3 3.8 ± 0.4 F = 2.35, p = 0.10, ηp2 = 0.03
Pain rating at control (VAS) 52.3 ± 1.3 50.7 ± 2.3 54.0 ± 2.2 52 ± 2.5 F = 0.50, p = 0.60, ηp2 = 0.01
Pain rating at placebo (VAS) 49.1 ± 1.4 46.8 ± 2.6 50.3 ± 2.1 50.1 ± 2.4 F = 0.69, p = 0.51, ηp2 = 0.01
Placebo analgesia (VAS control–VAS placebo) 3.2 ± 1.1 3.9 ± 1.8 3.7 ± 2.1 1.9 ± 1.7 F = 0.35, p = 0.71, ηp2 < 0.01
Placebo first 50.0% 51.0% 43.4% 56.0% -
Test session 2 (day 8)
EXPECT score preT2 (0–10) 6.0 ± 0.2 6.2 ± 0.3 6.0 ± 0.3 5.7 ± 0.3 F = 0.94, p = 0.39, ηp2 = 0.01
EXPECT score change from preCOND to preT2 0.1 ± 0.2 0.2 ± 0.2 0.3 ± 0.3 −0.04 ± 0.3 F = 0.32, p = 0.72, ηp2 < 0.01
EFFECT score (0–10) 4.1 ± 0.2 4.6 ± 0.3 3.9 ± 0.4 3.9 ± 0.4 F = 1.41, p = 0.25, ηp2 = 0.02
Pain rating at control (VAS) 45.9 ± 1.4 48.0 ± 2.3 46.0 ± 2.3 43.7 ± 2.7 F = 0.74, p = 0.48, ηp2 = 0.01
Pain rating at placebo (VAS) 43.9 ± 1.4 43.5 ± 2.5 45.0 ± 2.1 43.0 ± 2.8 F = 0.18, p = 0.84, ηp2 < 0.01
Placebo analgesia (VAS control–VAS placebo) 2.1 ± 1.2 4.4 ± 1.9 1.0 ± 2.1 0.7 ± 2.0 F = 1.05, p = 0.35, ηp2 = 0.01
Placebo first 49.0% 43.1% 49.1% 55.1% -

Metrics are given as mean ± SEM. Group differences are calculated with ANOVAs.