Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 11;10(18):e37360. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37360

Table 4.

WCMS vs. State-of-the-Art Methods in a 10-fold Cross-Validation Scenario (ACC).

Project Baseline Methods
RF
XGB
LGBM
EALR MULTI DEJIT LT AGE CCUM FI MO FI MO FI MO
BUG 0.286 0.696 0.769 0.477 0.413 0.785 0.618 0.639 0.553 0.619 0.518 0.619
COL 0.400 0.696 0.786 0.626 0.687 0.812 0.745 0.798 0.592 0.761 0.498 0.771
JDT 0.323 0.626 0.715 0.523 0.476 0.745 0.735 0.762 0.531 0.760 0.536 0.708
PLA 0.305 0.684 0.605 0.459 0.385 0.765 0.716 0.781 0.526 0.769 0.575 0.747
MOZ 0.180 0.511 0.748 0.375 0.244 0.605 0.817 0.832 0.541 0.859 0.475 0.821
POS 0.356 0.613 0.700 0.519 0.464 0.705 0.756 0.808 0.590 0.785 0.614 0.812
MEAN 0.308 0.638 0.721 0.497 0.445 0.736 0.731 0.770 0.556 0.759 0.536 0.746