Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 11;10(18):e37360. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37360

Table 5.

WCMS vs. State-of-the-Art Methods in a 10-fold Cross-Validation Scenario (Popt).

Project Baseline Methods
RF
XGB
LGBM
EALR MULTI DEJIT LT AGE CCUM FI MO FI MO FI MO
BUG 0.594 0.883 0.924 0.754 0.748 0.929 0.887 0.897 0.828 0.846 0.813 0.868
COL 0.619 0.880 0.909 0.842 0.856 0.937 0.918 0.944 0.773 0.943 0.727 0.929
JDT 0.590 0.829 0.874 0.781 0.747 0.885 0.905 0.922 0.745 0.919 0.781 0.899
PLA 0.583 0.853 0.812 0.748 0.707 0.893 0.908 0.937 0.743 0.927 0.813 0.919
MOZ 0.498 0.757 0.886 0.644 0.621 0.812 0.932 0.952 0.774 0.958 0.787 0.929
POS 0.6 0.843 0.892 0.805 0.768 0.902 0.930 0.948 0.778 0.939 0.820 0.948
MEAN 0.581 0.841 0.883 0.762 0.741 0.893 0.913 0.933 0.774 0.922 0.790 0.915