Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2024 Aug 21;6(9):1791–1806. doi: 10.1038/s42255-024-01114-8

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© The Author(s) 2024

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

PMC Copyright notice

Extended Data Fig. 6 — a, Food intake (gr) of Ctrl+Chow (grey, n = 6), Ctrl+HFD (black, n = 5), DT+Chow (pink, n = 4), DT + HFD (red, n = 6) over the last 4-weeks of high-fat diet (HFD). Right panel: area under the curve (AUC). P-values: Ctrl+chow vs Ctrl+HFD P = 0.7922, Ctrl+chow vs DT+chow P = 0.4762, Ctrl+chow vs DT + HFD P = 0.0649, Ctrl+HFD vs DT+chow P = 0.9048, Ctrl+HFD vs DT + HFD P = 0.6623; DT+chow vs DT + HFD P = 0.4762. b, Random fed glycemia of Ctrl+Chow (grey, n = 10), Ctrl+HFD (black, n = 10), DT+Chow (pink, n = 8), DT + HFD (red, n = 11) over 24 weeks of HFD. Right panel: AUC. P-values: Ctrl+chow vs Ctrl+HFD P < 0.62, Ctrl+chow vs DT+chow P = 0.12, Ctrl+chow vs DT + HFD P = 0.13, Ctrl+HFD vs DT+chow P = 0.03, Ctrl+HFD vs DT + HFD P = 0.04; DT+chow vs DT + HFD P = 0.97. c, Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (ipGTT) 24-weeks after HFD of Ctrl+chow (grey, n = 10), Ctrl+HFD (black, n = 10), DT+chow (pink, n = 8), DT + HFD (red, n = 11). Right panel: AUC. P-values: Ctrl+chow vs Ctrl+HFD P = 0.0073, Ctrl+chow vs DT+chow P = 0.0.0038, Ctrl+chow vs DT + HFD P = 0.9404, Ctrl+HFD vs DT+chow P < 0.0001, Ctrl+HFD vs DT + HFD P = 0.0012; DT+chow vs DT + HFD P = 0.0129. d, Plasma insulin release at 0 and 15 minutes after glucose injection in Ctrl+chow (grey, n = 9), Ctrl+HFD (black, n = 10), DT+chow (pink, n = 8), DT + HFD (red, n = 11). P-values: Ctrl+Chow (0’vs15’) P = 0.0039; Ctrl+HFD (0’vs15’) P = 0.0355; DT+Chow (0’vs15’) P = 0.0281; DT + HFD (0’vs15’) P = 0.0192. Ctrl+HFD vs DT + HFD at 0’ P = 0.0357; Ctrl+HFD vs DT+Chow at 15’ P = 0.0044; Ctrl+HFD vs DT + HFD at 15’ P = 0.0101. Only male mice were used. All data are shown as mean ± sem. All statistical tests are two-tailed Mann-Whitney test. Source data is available.

Source data