Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 4;16(17):12138–12167. doi: 10.18632/aging.206102

Table 2. Poor sleep quality, dementia odds (Loge transformed) and all-cause mortality: Cox PH models, overall, by sex and by race, HRS 2006–2020a,e.

Overall Male Female White Black/Hispanic/Others Psex Prace
β ± SE β ± SE β ± SE β ± SE β ± SE
Unweighted N N = 6,718 N = 2,854 N = 3,864 N = 5,440 N = 1,278
Analysis A
Reduced models
Model 1A: Poor sleep quality +0.022 ± 0.007c +0.030 ± 0.010c +0.016 ± 0.009 +0.026 ± 0.007d −0.009 ± 0.015 0.27 0.021
Model 1B: Hurd dementia +0.085 ± 0.010d +0.103 ± 0.005d +0.082 ± 0.011d +0.086 ± 0.011d +0.082 ± 0.018d 0.17 0.59
Model 1C: Expert dementia +0.151 ± 0.009d +0.144 ± 0.005d +0.156 ± 0.010d +0.156 ± 0.009d +0.114 ± 0.014d 0.69 0.001
Model 1D: LASSO dementia +0.194 ± 0.011d +0.180 ± 0.014d +0.207 ± 0.014 d +0.197 ± 0.011d +0.174 ± 0.018d 0.84 0.028
Full models N = 6,368 N = 2,653 N = 3,715 N = 5,204 N = 1,164
Model 2A: Poor sleep quality −0.033 ± 0.009c −0.016 ± 0.013 −0.044 ± 0.012c −0.030 ± 0.010c −0.057 ± 0.022c 0.099 0.032
Model 2B: Hurd dementia +0.098 ± 0.010d +0.080 ± 0.015d +0.114 ± 0.012d +0.100 ± 0.011d +0.084 ± 0.017d 0.99 0.041
Model 2C: Expert dementia +0.101 ± 0.009d +0.075 ± 0.013d +0.118 ± 0.011d +0.108 ± 0.009d +0.065 ± 0.016d 0.56 0.002
Model 2D: LASSO dementia +0.150 ± 0.013d +0.121 ± 0.018d +0.172 ± 0.016d +0.153 ± 0.014d +0.125 ± 0.024d 0.74 0.048
Analysis B
Reduced models N = 6,718 N = 2,854 N = 3,864 N = 5,440 N = 1,278
Model 1A: Poor sleep quality +0.072 ± 0.023c +0.099 ± 0.034c +0.052 ± 0.028 +0.088 ± 0.023d −0.026 ± 0.048 0.26 0.017
Model 1B: Hurd dementia +0.675 ± 0.057d +0.674 ± 0.080d +0.684 ± 0.081d +0.706 ± 0.058d +0.563 ± 0.116d 0.73 0.012
Model 1C: Expert dementia +0.731 ± 0.055d +0.716 ± 0.063d +0.743 ± 0.078d +0.745 ± 0.062d +0.673 ± 0.095d 0.90 0.16
Model 1D: LASSO dementia +0.681 ± 0.058d +0.708 ± 0.069d +0.679 ± 0.083d +0.696 ± 0.064d +0.658 ± 0.092d 0.36 0.069
Full models N = 6,368 N = 2,653 N = 3,715 N = 5,204 N = 1,164
Model 2A: Poor sleep quality −0.069 ± 0.027b −0.011 ± 0.037 −0.110 ± 0.033c −0.056 ± 0.030 −0.147 ± 0.067b 0.036 0.037
Model 2B: Hurd dementia +0.400 ± 0.065d +0.304 ± 0.088d +0.461 ± 0.088d +0.428 ± 0.070d +0.300 ± 0.117b 0.78 0.055
Model 2C: Expert dementia +0.457 ± 0.057d +0.369 ± 0.069d +0.510 ± 0.089d +0.474 ± 0.066d +0.422 ± 0.096d 0.80 0.13
Model 2D: LASSO dementia +0.415 ± 0.067d +0.448 ± 0.073d +0.410 ± 0.097d +0.416 ± 0.077d +0.437 ± 0.102d 0.26 0.37

Abbreviations: HRS: Health and Retirement Study; PH: Proportional hazards; SE: Standard Error. aValues are β ± SE, with β representing LogeHR from Cox PH model for each exposure-outcome relationship. Cox PH models were conducted overall and across sex or race/ethnicity groups, taking into account sampling weights and sampling design complexity in multiple imputed data. All covariates are measured in 2006 unless stated otherwise. Analysis A included continuous forms of dementia probability (Loge (odds of dementia)) and continuous “poor sleep quality” score; while Analysis B included binary dementia status (3 algorithms) and “poor sleep quality tertile”. bP < 0.05; cP < 0.010; dP < 0.001 for null hypothesis that β = 0. eReduced models (Models 1A–1D) were adjusted for age at 2006, sex and race/ethnicity. Full models (Model 2A-2D) further adjusted the reduced model by all covariates described under the Covariates section, including socio-demographic, socio-economic, lifestyle and health-related factors.