Skip to main content
. 2023 May 9;18(5):1492–1503. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01392-3

Table 4.

Effects and moderators of the effects of exercise on self-reported cognitive functioning

Self-reported cognitive functioning z-score
β (95% confidence interval) p-value LRT
Overall exercise effect (n=1987) −0.09 (−0.16; −0.02)
Exercise effect after treatment (n=745) −0.13 (−0.24; −0.02)
Exercise effect during treatment (n=1162) 0.08 (0.18; 0.02)
Sociodemographic moderators
 Age No significant interaction 0.17
 Education level No significant interaction 0.73
 Gender No significant interaction 0.32
Clinical moderators
 Chemotherapy No significant interaction 0.43
 Hormone therapy (breast cancer) No significant interaction 0.12
 Cancer type No significant interaction 0.32
Baseline levels of patient-reported outcomes
 Baseline fatigue No significant interaction 0.38
 Baseline cognitive functioning No significant interaction 0.60
 Depression* No significant interaction 1.00
 Anxietya,* 0.08
  Yes (n=325) 0.07 (0.12; 0.26)
  No (n=1314) −0.10 (−0.19; −0.02)
Intervention moderators
 Delivery modeb 0.97
  Unsupervised Reference
  Supervised 0.004 (0.15; 0.14)
 Intervention length 0.07
  =<12 weeks −0.14 (−0.25; −0.04)
  12–24 weeks 0.01 (0.13; 0.15)
  >24 weeks −0.18 (−0.32; −0.02)

aOriginally, anxiety was measured on a continuous scale. The score was dichotomized using cutoff scores from literature: HADS-A >9 [52], or using the mean: BSI and SCL-90

bInteraction testing is not applicable; therefore, differences between subgroups are reported. LRT of the model including the intervention characteristic vs the main model is presented

LRT likelihood ratio test

The respective z-scores are calculated using the MFI, CIS, FAQ and EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire

A negative z-score indicates an improvement in cognitive functioning

*Excluding two studies [31, 35] which did not measure depression or anxiety