Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct;30(10):1136–1148. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1136

TABLE 2.

Treatment Duration Between Prucalopride, Lubiprostone, Linaclotide, and Plecanatide During the Follow-Up Period

Persistence of index treatment a,b Prucalopride(n = 675) Lubiprostone(n = 1,591) Linaclotide(n = 11,105) Plecanatide(n = 1,329) All patients(N = 14,700)
Treatment duration, days
    Mean (SD) 123.44 (109.42) 100.79 (101.46) 117.18 (106.37) 112.25 (100.26) 115.25 (105.58)
    Median (range) 90.0 (5.0-457.0) 60.0 (1.0-455.0) 89.0 (1.0-457.0) 90.0 (10.0-457.0) 84.0 (1.0-457.0)
    Pairwise P valuea,c <0.001 0.300 0.213
Treatment duration category, days, n (%)
    0-30 233 (34.5) 718 (45.1) 3,772 (34.0) 440 (33.1) 5,163 (35.1)
    31-60 53 (7.9) 136 (8.5) 963 (8.7) 93 (7.0) 1,245 (8.5)
    61-90 89 (13.2) 210 (13.2) 2,013 (18.1) 321 (24.2) 2,633 (17.9)
    91-180 126 (18.7) 224 (14.1) 1,863 (16.8) 211 (15.9) 2,424 (16.5)
    181-270 81 (12.0) 154 (9.7) 1,200 (10.8) 126 (9.5) 1,561 (10.6)
    ≥271 93 (13.8) 149 (9.4) 1,294 (11.7) 138 (10.4) 1,674 (11.4)
    Pairwise P valuec <0.001 <0.05 <0.001

a Differences across treatment groups may reflect differences in the length of the follow-up period.

b Accounting for stockpiling, any days of supply that fell outside of the follow-up period were excluded.

c Pairwise statistical comparisons between prucalopride and each of the 3 comparator treatment cohorts were conducted using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for binary variables. Comparisons were conducted only if the P value for the joint statistical comparison was significant (P < 0.05).