Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct;30(10):1136–1148. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1136

TABLE 3.

Hazard Ratios for Time to Discontinuation of Lubiprostone, Linaclotide, and Plecanatide Relative to Prucalopride During the Follow-Up Period

Time during the follow-up period Time to index treatment discontinuationa (N = 14,700)
Hazard ratiob (relative to prucalopride) 95% CI P
At month 1
    Lubiprostone 1.47 1.25-1.72 <0.001
    Linaclotide 1.05 0.91-1.21 0.517
    Plecanatide 1.07 0.91-1.27 0.414
At month 2
    Lubiprostone 1.70 1.48-1.95 <0.001
    Linaclotide 1.25 1.10-1.41 <0.001
    Plecanatide 1.31 1.13-1.51 <0.001
At month 3
    Lubiprostone 1.96 1.66-2.31 <0.001
    Linaclotide 1.49 1.28-1.73 <0.001
    Plecanatide 1.59 1.35-1.89 <0.001
At month 6
    Lubiprostone 3.02 2.07-4.40 <0.001
    Linaclotide 2.51 1.77-3.55 <0.001
    Plecanatide 2.89 1.98-4.23 <0.001
At month 12
    Lubiprostone 7.18 2.99-17.26 <0.001
    Linaclotide 7.14 3.17-16.07 <0.001
    Plecanatide 9.52 3.91-23.17 <0.001

Statistical significance set at P < 0.05.

a Time to discontinuation was calculated as the time from the patient’s first prescription fill (index date) until a gap in treatment of at least 90 days.

b Hazard ratios were calculated using a multivariate Cox regression model, controlling for confounding factors. The model was adjusted for age at index date, sex, geographical region, insurance plan type, selected comorbidities during the baseline period, constipation-related/gastroenterologist health care resource utilization during the baseline period, and constipation-related treatments used during the baseline period. In addition, the model included interaction terms between time and each of the 3 comparator medications. A hazard ratio of greater than 1.00 indicates a higher risk of treatment discontinuation occurring in the comparator medication group compared with the prucalopride group.