Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct;30(10):1167–1177. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1167

TABLE 1.

Study Characteristics

First author (year) Country Study design Adherence data source n a Time Baseline characteristics Intervention characteristics
Mean age (SD) (y)b Sex (%) Mean A1C (SD) Mean adherence, % (SD) Insulin type Waste? Adherence measurec Glycemic measure
Ayyagari (2015) United States RCT IMPACT (2001-2010) (United States) 4,876 1 y 54 M: 54
F: 46
NA:9.0 (2.4);A:9.3 (2.1) NR Basal insulin Not noted Interfill periods Change in A1c
Cramer (2005) United States RCT VA PBM (2001– 2002) (Eastern United States and Puerto Rico) 6,222 2 y NR NR 8.0 (1.7) 77 (17) Any Not factored (assumed constant) Similar to MPR Change in A1c
Donnelly (2007) Scotland RCT DARTS/ MEMO Collaboration (1995-2001) (Tayside, Scotland) 1,099 6.75 y 62 (12) M: 52
F: 48
8.5 (1.3) 71 (18) Not noted Not noted Similar to PDC Change in A1c
Eby (2013) United States RCT Innovus InVision (2006-2010) (United States) 760 1 y P:54 (11)V:56 (12) P:
M: 55
F: 45
V:
M: 54
F: 46
NR NR Mealtime insulin (RAI, PMX insulin) Not noted aMPR Change in A1c
Egede (2014) United States RCT VA PBM (1997-2006) (Southeastern United States) NR 5.4 y 66 (12) M: 97
F: 3
NR NR Not noted Not noted aMPR Change in A1c
Grabner (2013) United States RCT HIRD (United States) 1,466 1 y 52 (NR) M: 57
F: 43
P: 9.5 (2.0);V: 9.4 (2.2) NR Insulin glargine No waste assumed aMPR Change in A1c
Hood (2021) United States RCT VA PBM (2014– 2017) (United States) 951 9 mo 63 (NR) M: 98
F: 2
9.3 (1.7) 73 (19) Any Not noted PDC Change in A1c
Kindmalm (2007) Sweden RCT 6 health centers (Skaraborg, Sweden) 102 1 y 64 (NR) NR NR NR Not noted Not noted Similar to MPR A1c levels at the end
Magny-Normilus (2021) United States RCT SureScripts (2012 - 2013) (Boston, MA) 122 4 mo I:65 (11)C:64 (12) I:
M: 42
F: 58
C:
M: 27
F: 73
I: 8.4 (2.0)C: 8.5 (2.3) NR Any Partial waste assumed aMPR Change in A1c
Slabaugh (2015) United States RCT Humana (MAPD plan) (2009-2012) (United States) 1,335 2 y P:69.4 (8.6)V: 70.1 (8.6) P:
M: 53
F: 47
V:
M: 57
F: 43
NR NR Basal insulin Not noted aMPR PDC Change in A1c
Wei (2014) United States RCT IMPACT (2006-2012); Humana (2006-2012) (United States) 2,809 1 y 60 (NR) M: 50
F: 50
IMPACT: 8.6 (1.7); Humana: 8.2 (1.5) NR Not noted Not noted aMPR Change in A1c

a This represents the patients receiving insulin who are represented in the systematic review/meta-analysis.

b This represents the whole cohort described in the study, including but not limited to the ones receiving insulin.

c The MPR was noted as being adjusted if any modifications to a standard MPR calculation was made. A = adherent; aMPR = adjusted medication possession ratio; BBI = basal-bolus insulin; DARTS = Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside; C = control group; DET-C = continued insulin detemir; F = female; GLA-C = continued insulin glargine; A1c = hemoglobin A1c; HIRD = HealthCore Integrated Research Database; I = intervention group; M = male, MAPD = Medicare Advantage with Prescription Drug; MEMO = Medicine Monitoring Unit; mo = months; MPR = medication possession ratio; NA = nonadherent; NR = not reported; P = pen group; PBM = pharmacy benefit management; PDC = proportion of days covered; PMX = premixed; RAI = rapid-acting insulin; RCT = randomized controlled trial; V = vial group; VA = Veterans Administration; y = years.