ABSTRACT
Objective:
This retrospective analysis aimed to estimate the efficiency of laser therapy in the management of acne scarring, assessing changes in scar severity, patient satisfaction, and adverse events.
Methods:
A cohort of 150 subjects with clinically diagnosed acne scarring who underwent laser therapy. Data were extracted from electronic medical records, and baseline characteristics, scar types, and management parameters were analyzed. Outcome measures included changes in scar severity scores, patient-reported satisfaction, and documentation of adverse events. Statistical analyses were conducted using appropriate methods, with sub-group analyses based on scar type and laser modality.
Results:
Following laser therapy, a statistically significant decrease in scar severity scores was seen across all scar types (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was high, with 75% reporting significant improvement. Adverse events were mild and transient, including erythema and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. Sub-group analyses did not reveal significant differences in management outcomes based on scar type or laser modality.
Conclusion:
Laser therapy demonstrates effectiveness in reducing acne scarring with a favorable safety profile. The research supports its role as a versatile management modality for diverse scar presentations, emphasizing the need for further research to optimize protocols and explore combination therapies.
KEYWORDS: Acne scarring, adverse events, laser therapy, patient satisfaction, scar severity
INTRODUCTION
Acne vulgaris is a prevalent skin disorder involving individuals of all ages, with a considerable proportion experiencing persistent or residual scarring. The psycho-social impact of acne scarring is well documented, often leading to diminished self-esteem and quality of life. While various management modalities exist, with topical agents, chemical peels, and surgical procedures, laser therapy has emerged as a promising option for addressing acne scarring.[1,2,3,4] Laser therapy offers several advantages, including precise targeting of scar tissue, controlled thermal injury, and stimulation of collagen remodeling. Despite its growing popularity, the efficiency of laser therapy in handling acne scarring stays a subject of debate, with conflicting evidence in the literature.[4,5,6] This retrospective analysis aims to contribute to the existing body of knowledge by evaluating the real-world effectiveness of laser therapy in a diverse cohort of acne scar patients. By assessing outcomes such as scar severity, patient satisfaction, and adverse events, this research seeks to provide valuable insights into the role of laser therapy as a viable management option for acne scarring. Understanding the efficacy and safety profile of laser therapy is essential for informing clinical practice and optimizing patient outcomes in the managing of acne scarring.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This retrospective analysis included subjects diagnosed with acne scarring who underwent laser therapy at a tertiary care unit between 2022 and 2023. Patient data were extracted from electronic medical records and paper charts, ensuring comprehensive inclusion of eligible cases. Inclusion criteria comprised subjects of all ages with clinically diagnosed acne scarring who received laser therapy as a standalone management or in combination with other modalities. Exclusion criteria included subjects with incomplete medical records, concurrent dermatological conditions affecting scar assessment, and a record of keloid or hypertrophic scarring. The primary outcome measures included changes in scar severity assessed through standardized grading systems, such as the Global Acne Scarring Classification Scale, patient-reported satisfaction scores, and documentation of any adverse events related to laser therapy. Data analysis was conducted using appropriate statistical methods, including descriptive statistics for demographic characteristics and outcome variables. Sub-group analyses based on scar type, laser modality, and management parameters were performed to explore potential factors influencing management outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 150 subjects with acne scarring were comprised in the analysis. The mean age of the cohort was 28.5 years, with a slight predominance of females (58%). The most common types of acne scars observed were atrophic (63%) and hypertrophic (22%), with the remaining 15% being a combination of various types. Following laser therapy, there was a statistically significant reduction in scar severity scores across all scar types (P < 0.05). Table 1 presents the baseline attributes of the research cohort, including age, gender distribution, and scar types. Table 2 displays the changes in scar severity scores before and after laser therapy, along with corresponding P-values. Overall, 75% of subjects reported a significant improvement in scar appearance, with a mean satisfaction score of 8.4 on a scale of 1 to 10. Adverse events were mild and transient, with the most common being transient erythema (15%) and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (10%). Sub-group analysis revealed no significant differences in management outcomes based on scar type or laser modality. These findings highlight the effectiveness of laser therapy in reducing acne scarring with a favorable safety profile.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of research cohort
| Characteristics | n (%) |
|---|---|
| Age | 28.5±5.2 [Mean (±SD)] |
| Gender | |
| Female | 87 (58%) |
| Male | 63 (42%) |
| Scar Types | |
| Atrophic | 95 (63%) |
| Hypertrophic | 33 (22%) |
| Mixed | 22 (15%) |
Table 2.
Changes in scar severity scores pre- and post-laser therapy
| Scar Type | Mean Scores | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Pre-management | Post-management | ||
| Atrophic | 3.2±0.8 | 1.5±0.5 | <0.001 |
| Hypertrophic | 2.8±0.6 | 1.4±0.4 | <0.001 |
| Mixed | 3.0±0.7 | 1.6±0.6 | <0.001 |
DISCUSSION
Laser therapy offers several advantages over traditional management modalities for acne scarring. One of the key benefits is its ability to precisely target scar tissue while minimizing damage to the surrounding healthy skin. By delivering controlled thermal energy to the dermis, laser therapy stimulates collagen production and promotes tissue remodeling, leading to smoother skin texture and reduced scar visibility.[3] Additionally, laser therapy is associated with minimal downtime and discomfort compared to surgical interventions, making it a preferred option for many subjects.[4]
Current research observed a predominance of atrophic acne scars, which are characterized by loss of tissue volume and depressed scars. Laser therapy has been particularly effective in addressing atrophic scars, with significant improvements observed in scar severity scores post treatment. This is consistent with the mechanism of action of laser therapy, which targets the dermal layer to stimulate neo-collagenesis and improve the appearance of depressed scars.[5] Hypertrophic scars, characterized by excess collagen deposition and raised scar tissue, also demonstrated improvement following laser therapy. The ability of laser therapy to modulate collagen synthesis and remodel scar tissue may contribute to its efficacy in treating hypertrophic scars.[6]
Sub-group analyses based on scar type and laser modality did not reveal significant differences in management outcomes, suggesting that laser therapy is effective across diverse patient populations and scar presentations. This underscores the versatility of laser therapy as a management modality for acne scarring, offering customizable solutions tailored to individual patient needs. However, further research is needed to explore the optimal laser parameters and management protocols for different scar types and skin types.
While laser therapy has demonstrated promising results in the management of acne scarring, it is not without limitations and potential risks. Adverse events observed in current research were mostly mild and transient, including erythema and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. These side effects are typically self-limiting and resolve with time, but they underscore the importance of proper patient selection and counseling. Those with a history of keloid or hypertrophic scarring may be at increased risk of adverse events and should be monitored closely during management.[7] Additionally, individuals with darker skin types may be more prone to pigmentary changes and should be treated cautiously to minimize the risk of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation.[8,9,10,11]
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, current findings uphold the use of laser therapy as a safe and efficient managing option for acne scarring. Laser therapy offers significant improvements in scar severity and patient satisfaction, with a favorable safety profile. While further research is needed to optimize management protocols and address potential risks, laser therapy holds promise as a valuable tool in the management of acne scarring, offering customizable solutions tailored to individual patient needs.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Fife D, Fitzpatrick R, Zachary C. Complications of fractional CO2 laser resurfacing: Four cases. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41:179–84. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sadick NS, Schecter AK. A preliminary study of utilization of the 1550-nm wavelength fractionated erbium-glass laser for acne scarring: A retrospective review of clinical outcomes. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2010;12:156–60. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Alexiades-Armenakas M. Laser-mediated photodynamic therapy of acne vulgaris: Combined treatment with laser and PDT can be effective for acne scarring, especially in darker skin types. Dermatol Ther. 2010;23:158–63. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Alam M, Omura N, Kaminer MS. Subcision for acne scarring: Technique and outcomes in 40 patients. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:310–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rahman Z, Alam M, Dover JS. Fractional laser treatment for pigmentation and texture improvement. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:988–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chan HH, Manstein D, Yu CS, Shek S, Kono T, Wei WI. The prevalence and risk factors of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation after fractional resurfacing in Asians. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39:381–5. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chua SH, Ang P, Khoo LS, Goh CL. Nonablative 1450-nm diode laser in the treatment of facial atrophic acne scars in type IV to V Asian skin: A prospective clinical study. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:1287–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30402.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fabbrocini G, Fardella N, Monfrecola A, Proietti I, Innocenzi D. Acne scarring treatment using skin needling. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009;34:874–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03291.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Asif M, Kanodia S, Singh K. Combined autologous platelet-rich plasma with microneedling verses microneedling with distilled water in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: A concurrent split-face study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016;15:434–43. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rani N, Kumar P, Mishra AK, Sankuratri BY, Sethi S, Gelada K, Tiwari H. Efficacy of spironolactone in adult acne in polycystic ovary syndrome patients an original research. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_391_21. Nov;13 (Suppl 2): S1659-S1663. Epub 2021 Nov 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kattimani V, Tiwari RVC, Gufran K, Wasan B, Shilpa PH, Khader AA. Botulinum toxin application in facial esthetics and recent treatment indications (2013-2018) J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019;9:99–105. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_430_18. Epub 2019 Apr 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]