Table 5.
Comparison of assay performances of commercial and in-house ELISAs.
| Seropositivity by in-house ELISA | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBD-IgG ELISA | RBD-IgM ELISA | NC-IgG ELISA | NC-IgM ELISA | |||
| Total study group | 70.0% (n = 35/50) | 84.0% (n = 42/50) | 88.0% (n = 44/50) | 82.0% (n = 41/50) | ||
| Commercial ELISA kits (RBD-IgG, RBD-IgM, NC-IgG, or NC-IgM) | Seropositives | 48.0% (n = 24/50) | 100.0% (n = 24/24) | 100.0% (n = 24/24) | 100.0% (n = 24/24) | 95.8% (n = 23/24) |
| Equivocal | 28.0% (n = 14/50) | 71.4% (n = 10/14) | 92.9% (n = 13/14) | 92.9% (n = 13/14) | 85.7% (n = 12/14) | |
| Seronegatives | 24.0% (n = 12/50) | 8.3% (n = 1/12) | 41.7% (n = 5/12) | 58.3% (n = 7/12) | 50.0% (n = 6/12) | |