Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 7;77(2):235–242. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.266

Table 3.

Differences in functional outcomes during follow-up

Δ T1-T0* (n = 120) p-value Δ T2-T0* (n = 120) p-value Δ T3-T0* (n = 108) p-value
ΔIPSS, median (IQR)ΔIPSS, median (IQR) -11 (-16; -6) <0.001 -12 (-17; -8) <0.001 -12 (-17; -9) <0.001
ΔIPSS-QoL, median (IQR) -3 (-4; -1) <0.001 -3 (-4; -2) <0.001 -3 (-4; -2) <0.001
ΔIIEF-5, median (IQR) 0 (-1; +1) 0.3 0 (0; 0) 0.6 0 (0; +1) 0.08
ΔQmax (ml/s), median (IQR) +8.3 (+6.4; +11.8) <0.001 +7.7 (+5.3; +11.7) <0.001 +7.7 (+5.2; +11.0) <0.001
ΔPVR (ml), median (IQR) -50 (-79; 0) <0.001 -50 (-90; 0) <0.001 -50 (-100; 0) <0.001
*

T0 = preoperative; T1 = 6 months; T2 = 12 months; T3 = 24 months

IPSS – International Prostate Symptoms Score questionnaire; IPSS-QoL – IPSS quality of life score; IIEF-5 – International Index of Erectile Function; Qmax – maximum flow rate; PVR – post-void residual