Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 1;11(9):891. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11090891

Table 2.

Statistical results of subjective evaluation scale based on CVH gross anatomical structure mapping.

Theme Five-Point Scale Design
A B C D E
Accuracy of TSPR interaction behavior (A smooth operation, one-time success, B relatively smooth operation, some steps need to be repeated, C achieve mapping objectives, D not very useful, E ineffective) 15 2 1
Efficiency of TSPR interaction behavior (A can be completed in 1 min, B can be completed in 2 min, C can be completed in 3 min, D is cumbersome, E cannot complete the operation) 17 1
Degree of match between the mapped region of the ROI of the CVH and datasets (A perfect match, B mostly match, C half match, D less than half, E not valid at all) 15 3