Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 11;14(18):2640. doi: 10.3390/ani14182640

Table 5.

Comparison of different improved C2f networks.

Methods Precision (%) Recall (%) mAP50 (%) mAP50-95 (%) Para (M) GFLOPs
C2f_EMA 87.3 81.8 86.3 62.7 29.91 8.1
C2f_iRMB 84.2 83.1 86.3 63.6 29.83 8.1
C2f_AKConv 86.1 80.4 85.6 65.4 23.67 8.2
C2f_Faster 83.5 81.9 86.8 62.7 32.79 8.0
C2f_EMCA 87.8 81.7 87.5 64.7 33.54 8.1
C2f_iAFF 88.7 83.4 89.8 66.2 30.52 8.1