Abstract
Introduction
The cephalic index (CI) is the most commonly used index to determine the race of an individual. It is calculated as the ratio of the breadth of the skull to the length of the skull multiplied by 100. The CI of an individual can be influenced by factors such as race, ethnicity, genetic predisposition, lifestyle choices, nutritional habits, environmental factors, and climatic conditions.
Material and methods
This study was carried out on 413 individuals in the tribal districts of Himachal Pradesh (Kinnaur, Spiti, and Lahaul), with 247 (59.8%) male and 166 (40.2%) female subjects. Measurements of the skull were taken using a spreading caliper. The CI was calculated using Hardlika’s method and data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US).
Results
The head shapes of the majority of the tribal population of Himachal Pradesh are mesocephalic, with the mean CI for males and females being 78.90 and 79.81, respectively, without any significant difference. The mean CI of the overall population is 79.27. The majority population of the Kinnaur district is brachycephalic, while the Spiti and Lahaul populations are mesocephalic with females predominately brachycephalic and males predominately mesocephalic.
Conclusion
The Indigenous population of Himachal Pradesh is mesocephalic with females predominately brachycephalic.
Keywords: mesocephalic, brachycephalic, high altitude, indigenous population, tribal population, head shapes, races, craniometry, anthropology, cephalic index
Introduction
Cephalometry is the analysis of anthropometric measurements of the human head. This holds considerable significance in several areas such as identifying unknown living individuals, determining the identity of individuals from skull specimens, discerning racial characteristics, employing 3D reconstruction imaging for identification purposes, and aiding in the resolution of criminal cases [1].
The cephalic index (CI), also known as the cranial index or breadth index, is widely recognized as a primary metric for human racial classification. Anders Retzius, a Swedish Anatomy professor, first introduced the CI, which was initially employed to identify human remains found in Europe [2].
The importance of age, gender, and population-specific CI data extends across various domains, offering valuable insights for monitoring treatment and predicting orthodontic outcomes. Moreover, this knowledge holds significance in plastic and reconstructive surgeries, particularly those addressing craniofacial deformities [3]. In contemporary contexts, the CI is also utilized to define the physical attributes of individuals and to estimate the age of fetuses for legal and obstetrical considerations [4,5]. Furthermore, it serves as a foundation for diagnostic prediction, such as in cases of dolichocephalic individuals, who are less susceptible to otitis media, and in individuals with Apert's syndrome, who exhibit hyperbrachycephalic characteristics [6,7].
This study presents a CI database crucial for forensic medicine, plastic surgery, and orofacial reconstruction. It is the first such study to explore the CI in the adult Indigenous population of Kinnaur, Lahaul, and Spiti districts, Himachal Pradesh, considering age, gender, and geography.
Materials and methods
This study was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee (Biomedical & Health Research) at AIIMS Bilaspur, reference no. 68/23, dated 05/08/2023. This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted among the adult population of the tribal districts of Kinnaur, Lahaul, and Spiti in Himachal Pradesh, India. Participants were selected from families that have resided in these tribal districts for at least three generations, ensuring that our study population represents the inherited characteristics of the native tribal population.
According to the last Census in 2011, the total population of these tribal districts is 115,865. A sample size of 383 was calculated to achieve a 95% confidence level with a 5% margin of error. All participants were aged between 18 and 50 years and selected through cluster sampling via a door-to-door survey. Participants with visible deformities in the head, face, or vertebrae were excluded, as were those with a history of craniofacial injury, surgery, or developmental or metabolic disorders. To minimize inter-observer bias, all measurements were taken by a single observer using standard anthropometric instruments, following the technique described by Vallois [8].
All measurements were taken using a spreading caliper, thrice in a single sitting on the same day to avoid observational bias, and the average of the three recordings was used for analysis. Subjects were sitting in a relaxed position, with their heads anatomically aligned in the orbito-ocular plane (horizontal Frankfurt plane). The glabella (G) is the point above the nasal root between the eyebrows intersected by the mid-sagittal plane; the opisthocranion (OP) is the most posterior point on occipital protuberance of the head in the mid-sagittal plane; and the Euryon (Eu) is the most lateral point on the sides of the head, indicating maximum cranial breadth. Head length is determined as the maximal anteroposterior diameter from the glabella to the opisthocranion (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Measuring head length.
The head breadth is measured as the maximum transverse diameter between the two Euryons (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Measuring head breadth.
The CI was assessed using the method described by Hardlika, as this method has been used numerous times by researchers [9]. According to it, the cephalic index (CI) was calculated using the formula: CI = [Cranial breadth / Cranial length] × 100. Based on the CI, head shapes are classified into three main types: dolichocephalic or long-headedness (CI < 75); brachycephalic or short and broad-headedness (CI > 80); and mesocephalic (CI = 75-80) [10].
Data entry was completed in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, US) while data analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US). Descriptive statistics, such as mean, standard deviation, median, and minimum and maximum values, were calculated. For parametric data, an independent samples t-test was used for comparisons between two groups, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied for comparisons among more than two groups. Categorical data were analyzed using the chi-squared test. P value less than 0.05 is considered to be significant.
Results
CI was calculated for both genders and across the different districts within the studied population. Interestingly, the mean CI for males, females, and the overall population falls within the mesocephalic category. Notably, the mean CI for females is slightly higher than that for males. However, it's intriguing that despite this discrepancy, there are no statistically significant gender differences present (P value= 0.079) (Table 1).
Table 1. The variation in CI among the tribal population of Himachal Pradesh.
CI: cephalic index
Parameters | Male | Female | Total |
Number (%) | 247(59.8%) | 166(40.2%) | 413(100%) |
Mean + SD | 78.90 + 5.27 | 79.81 + 4.91 | 79.27 + 5.13 |
Median | 78.14 | 79.48 | 79.03 |
Minimum | 66.84 | 68.9 | 66.84 |
Maximum | 112.88 | 106.94 | 112.88 |
A box and whisker plot was created to illustrate the variation in CI for both males and females (Figure 3). Ninety-nine percent of the study population is within normal limits and less than 1% of the study subjects were outliers, which did not affect the final result.
Figure 3. CI variation in both genders.
CI: cephalic index
In Kinnaur, males exhibit a mean CI categorized as mesocephalic while females show a tendency toward brachycephaly. Conversely, both males and females in Spiti and Lahaul have a mean CI falling within the mesocephalic range. Overall, the mean CI across all districts tends toward mesocephalic but is gradually approaching brachycephalic. Notably, there is no significant difference observed in the mean CI between Kinnaur and Spiti (P value 0.775), Kinnaur and Lahaul (P value 0.208), and Spiti and Lahaul (P value 1.00) (Table 2).
Table 2. District-wise variation in CI.
CI: cephalic index
Parameters | Kinnaur | Spiti | Lahaul | ||||||
Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | |
No. (%) | 125 | 102 | 227 (55%) | 53 | 46 | 99 (24%) | 69 | 18 | 87 (21%) |
Mean + SD | 79.38 + 4.61 | 80.05 + 4.97 | 79.68 + 4.79 | 78.47 + 5.09 | 79.57 + 3.8 | 78.98 + 4.57 | 78.37 + 6.3 | 79.03 + 6.54 | 78.5+ 6.36 |
Median | 79.1 | 79.72 | 79.46 | 77.72 | 79 | 78.46 | 77 | 79.23 | 77.3 |
Minimum | 67.52 | 68.89 | 67.52 | 66.84 | 72.1 | 66.84 | 68.96 | 70.62 | 68.96 |
Maximum | 94.61 | 106.94 | 106.94 | 100 | 87.86 | 100 | 112.88 | 95.1 | 112.88 |
In Kinnaur, the predominant population exhibits brachycephalic traits, whereas in Spiti and Lahaul, the majority are categorized as mesocephalic. However, when considering the overall population, males tend to be predominantly mesocephalic while females lean toward brachycephaly. When both sexes are combined, the overall population shows a tendency toward mesocephalic traits (Table 3).
Table 3. Percentage-wise variation of CI among districts.
CI: cephalic index
Districts | Parameters | Dolichocephalic (<75) | Mesocephalic (75- 79.99) | Brachycephalic (>80) |
Kinnaur | Male (n, %) | 20 (16%) | 51 (40.8%) | 54 (43.2%) |
Female (n, %) | 13 (12.75%) | 40 (39.22%) | 49 (48.04%) | |
Total (n, %) | 33 (14.54%) | 91 (40.09%) | 103 (45.37%) | |
Spiti | Male (n, %) | 11 (20.75%) | 26 (49.06%) | 16 (30.19%) |
Female (n, %) | 4 (8.7%) | 23 (50%) | 19 (41.3%) | |
Total (n, %) | 15(15.15%) | 49 (49.49%) | 35 (35.35%) | |
Lahaul | Male (n, %) | 20 (28.99%) | 28 (40.58%) | 21 (30.43%) |
Female (n, %) | 5 (27.78%) | 7 (38.89%) | 6 (33.33%) | |
Total (n, %) | 25 (28.74%) | 35 (40.23%) | 27 (31.03%) | |
Overall | Male (n, %) | 51 (20.65%) | 105 (42.51%) | 91 (36.84%) |
Female (n, %) | 22 (13.25%) | 70 (42.17%) | 74 (44.58%) | |
Total (n, %) | 73 (17.67%) | 175 (42.37%) | 165 (39.95%) |
Discussion
The CI of an individual can be influenced by factors such as race, ethnicity, genetic predisposition, lifestyle choices, nutritional habits, environmental factors, and climatic conditions [11]. Australian Aborigines and native Southern Africans typically exhibit dolichocephalic characteristics while Europeans and Asians tend to have mesocephalic features. On the other hand, Mongolians and Andaman Islanders often display brachycephalic traits [3]. The resemblance in the cephalic index among parents, offspring, and siblings can provide insights into the hereditary pattern of the cephalic index [2].
We compared the cephalic index (CI) findings from our study with data from other regions of India to explore correlations and variations in CI values across different areas (Table 4).
Table 4. A comparison of CI in the present study with populations of different regions of India.
CI: cephalic index
Authors | Year | People / Country | CI (M) | CI(F) | CI (Mean) |
Shah GV et al. [12] | 2003 | Gujarat | 80.42 | 81.2 | 80.81 |
Mahajan A et al. [13] | 2009 | Punjab | 81.34 | 85.75 | 83.55 |
Salve VM et al. [14] | 2011 | Andhra Pradesh | 75.68 | 78.2 | 76.94 |
Khair S et al. [15] | 2011 | Mumbai region of Maharastra | 81.28 | 75.22 | 78.48 |
Jhadav et al. [16] | 2011 | Different casts in Gujrat | 80.20 | -- | -- |
Yagain et al. [17] | 2012 | Indian students | 77.85 | 80.85 | 79.35 |
Gupta et al. [18] | 2013 | North India | 78.79 | 76.83 | 77.81 |
Uttekar et al. [19] | 2013 | South Gujrat | 82.82 | 82.48 | 82.65 |
Kumar M et al. [20] | 2013 | Bania caste in Haryana | 66.72 | 72.25 | 69.49 |
Nair et al. [2] | 2014 | Madhya Pradesh | 81.03 | 80.31 | 81.21 |
Mishra M et al. [21] | 2014 | Vindhya region of Madhya Pradesh | 79.85 | 79.05 | 79.45 |
Shah T et al. [22] | 2015 | Gujrat | 77.15 | 77.38 | 77.26 |
Jaiswal P et al. [23] | 2016 | Hadoti region of Rajasthan | 77.60 | 78.47 | 78.04 |
Sultan SI et al. [24] | 2017 | Marathwada region of Maharastra | 79.12 | 78.67 | 78.89 |
Gosh SM et al. [25] | 2018 | West Bengal | 81.2 | 80.76 | 81.09 |
Ahmed et al. [26] | 2018 | Jhalawar region of Rajasthan | 74.07 | 74.39 | 74.23 |
Byhnadaorili et al. [27] | 2018 | Tribes of Northeast states | 83.08 | 82.90 | 82.99 |
Nawaz Ahmed SK et al. [28] | 2019 | Kelambakkam region of Tamil Nadu | 77.93 | 75.22 | 76.58 |
Khanduri et al. [29] | 2021 | North India | 75.59 | 77.94 | 76.67 |
Present study | 2023 | Tribal districts of Himachal Pradesh | 78.90 | 79.81 | 79.27 |
The mean CI for the Indian population, including data from our study, falls within the mesocephalic range [14,15,20-24,26,29]. Our analysis reveals that the mean CI for females is consistently higher than that for males, which corresponds with the majority of studies reviewed [12-14,17-23,26-27,29]. Furthermore, our study shows that most females exhibit a brachycephalic pattern, a finding that is corroborated by other research in the field [2,12-13,17,19,25,27].
Kinnaur and its neighboring district share a border with the Tibet region, with multiple routes connecting these regions. These routes have historically facilitated the exchange of culture and religion, as well as the migration of people. This migration led to the intermingling of the Mongolian race with the predominantly mesocephalic Indian race [30]. This can explain the predominant brachycephalic CI in the Kinnaur district and adjoining areas.
Limitations of the study
This study specifically targeted the tribal population of Himachal Pradesh. Therefore, it's important to note that the CI calculated from this study may not be generalizable to the entire population of Himachal Pradesh. The CI of an individual is influenced by a multitude of factors, including age, environmental conditions, nutrition, and lifestyle, among others. While these variables were not the primary focus of our study, it's important to note that our research centered on a population residing in the region for the past three generations. Exploring these parameters in greater detail could offer valuable insights in future investigations.
Conclusions
The head shape of the tribal population of Himachal Pradesh is predominantly mesocephalic, with a mean CI of 78.90 for males and 79.81 for females, resulting in an overall population mean CI of 79.27. While the majority of males exhibit mesocephalic traits, females tend toward brachycephalic characteristics. However, when considering the overall population, mesocephalic traits are predominant. Specifically, the population of Kinnaur tends to be predominantly brachycephalic while people from Spiti and Lahaul exhibit mesocephalic tendencies.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the village head/tribal chief who accorded permission/assent to carry out research for data collection and convince the participants to participate in the present study.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institute Ethics Committee (Biomedical & Health Research) AIIMS Bilapsur issued approval 68/23, Date: 05/08/2023.
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Nirmal Nagar, Dipen Dabhi, Yatiraj Singi
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Nirmal Nagar, Dipen Dabhi, Yatiraj Singi, Reshma Rathore
Drafting of the manuscript: Nirmal Nagar, Dipen Dabhi, Yatiraj Singi
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Nirmal Nagar, Dipen Dabhi, Yatiraj Singi, Reshma Rathore
Supervision: Nirmal Nagar, Dipen Dabhi, Yatiraj Singi
References
- 1.An anthropometric study of correlation between cephalic index, cranial volume and cranial measurements in Indian cadavers. Raveendranath V, Manjunath K. https://scholar.google.ca/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=TeS3V7MAAAAJ&citation_for_view=TeS3V7MAAAAJ:ULOm3_A8WrAC Indian Sci Abstracts. 2010;15:55–58. [Google Scholar]
- 2.The study of cephalic index of medical students of Central India. Nair SK, Vaibhav P, Singh AS, Bindra M, Satpathy DK. https://www.alliedacademies.org/articles/the-study-of-cephalic-index-of-medical-students-of-central-india.pdf Asian J Biomed Pharm Sci. 2014;4:48–50. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Morphometric estimation of cephalic index in North Indian population: craniometrics study. Kumar A, Nagar M. https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v4i4/SUB153571.pdf Int J Sci Res. 2015;4:1976–1982. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Determination of gestational age after the 24th week of gestation from fetal kidney length measurements. Konje JC, Abrams KR, Bell SC, Taylor DJ. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:592–597. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00704.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Assessment of gestation by ultrasound in various stages of pregnancy in infants differing in size and ethnic origin. Dubowitz LM, Goldberg C. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981;88:255–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1981.tb00978.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cranial size and configuration in the Apert syndrome. Cohen MM Jr, Kreiborg S. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7852544/ J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1994;14:153–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Head shape and abnormal appearance of tympanic membranes. Stolovitzky JP, Todd NW. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;102:322–325. doi: 10.1177/019459989010200403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Anthropometric techniques. Vallois HV. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/200577 Curr Anthropol. 1965;6:127–143. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stewart TD. Biology. Vol. 1952. Philadelphia: Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology; 1952. Hrdlicka's Practical Anthropometry. 4th edition; pp. 87–89. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kannan JK. A Textbook of Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology. Gurgaon, India: LexisNexis India; 2022. Personal identity; pp. 237–238. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cephalofacial morphological characteristics of Albanian Kosova population. Rexhepi A, Meka V. https://www.scielo.cl/pdf/ijmorphol/v26n4/art24.pdf Int J Morphol. 2008;26:935–940. [Google Scholar]
- 12.The study of cephalic index in students of Gujarat. Shah GV, Jadav HR. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267721532_The_Study_of_Cephalic_index_in_Students_of_Gujarat J Anat Soc India. 2003;53:25–26. [Google Scholar]
- 13.The study of cephalic index in Punjabi students. Mahajan A, Khurana BS, Seema Seema, Batra APS. https://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:jpafmat&volume=9&issue=2&article=002 J Punjab Acad Forensic Med Toxicol. 2009;10:66–70. [Google Scholar]
- 14.The study of cephalic index of Andhra region (India) Salve VM, Thota NR, Patibandla A. Asian J Med Sci. 2011;2(1):53–55. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Study of Cephalic Index Among the Students of Mumbai Region. Khair S, Bhandari D, Wavhal S. https://www.worldwidejournals.com/indian-journal-of-applied-research-(IJAR)/article/study-of-cephalic-index-among-the-students-of-mumbai-region/MjYxMg==/?is=1 Indian J Appl Res. 2011;3:64–66. [Google Scholar]
- 16.A study to correlate cephalic index of various caste/races of Gujarat state. Jadav HR, Kariya VB, Kodiyatar BB, Pensi CA. http://nicpd.ac.in/ojs-/index.php/njirm/article/view/1902 Natl J Integr Res Med. 2011;2:18–22. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Study of cephalic index in Indian students. Yagain VK, Pai SR, Kalthur SG, Chethan P, Hemalatha I. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9ea7/d50f9a903cff627d9e595e0a49f3939aa640.pdf Int J Morphol. 2012;30:125–129. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cranial anthropometry in 600 North Indian adults. Gupta S, Goppichand PVV, Kaushal S, Chhabra S, Garsa V. https://www.ijanatomy.in/ijar_articles_vol1_02/231.pdf Int J Anat Res. 2013;1:115–118. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Study of cephalic index in South Gujarat. Uttekar K, Gupta D, Andani R, Kubavat DM, Nagar SK, Varlekar P. https://statperson.com/Journal/ScienceAndTechnology/Article/Volume8Issue2/8_2_7.pdf International Journal of Recent Trends in Science And Technology. 2013;8:87–89. [Google Scholar]
- 20.The study of cephalic index in Haryanvi population. Kumar M, Gopichand PVV. https://www.ijpab.com/form/2013%20volume%201,%20issue%203/IJPAB-2013-1-3-1-6.pdf Int J Pure App Bioscience. 2013;1:1–6. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Study of cephalic index in Vindhya region of Madhya Pradesh. Mishra M, Tiwari A, Naik D. https://www.academia.edu/92938832/Study_of_cephalic_index_in_Vindhya_region_of_Madhya_Pradesh?uc-sb-sw=62356251 Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2014;3:1464–1465. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Assessment of cephalic and facial indices: a proof for ethnic and sexual dimorphism. Shah T, Thaker MB, Menon SK. https://www.annexpublishers.co/articles/JFSC/volume-2-issue-4/Assessment-of-Cephalic-and-Facial-Indices-A-proof-for-Ethnic-and-Sexual-Dimorphism.pdf J Forensic Sci Criminol. 2015;3 [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cephalic index and head shape in various castes of Hadoti region. Jaiswal P, Rathore KB, Masih W. https://www.ijss-sn.com/uploads/2/0/1/5/20153321/ijss_may_oa53.pdf Int J Sci Stud. 2016;4:242–246. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Study of cephalic index among the students of Marathwada region. Sultan SI, Tekale VM, Diwan CV. Int J Anat Res. 2017;5:4078–4081. [Google Scholar]
- 25.A study of cephalic index among the young age group of West Bengal in relation to sex and geographical factors. Ghosh R. https://www.ijbamr.com/assets/images/issues/pdf/June%202018%20239%20-%20245.pdf.pdf Indian J Basic Appl Med Res. 2018;7:239–245. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cephalic index in population of District Jhalawar, Rajasthan according to food habit and it’s significance. Ahmed S, Aghera BR, Sharma G, Sharma MK, Rathore MS. https://imsear.searo.who.int/items/4fb275cd-80d6-4862-9b4a-e984f16538f7 Int Arch BioMed Clin Res. 2018;29:56–58. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Variation in features of cephalic index among seven different tribal population of northeastern states of India. Byhnadaorili S, Gupta K, Nerwal P, Gupta AK, Mishra MK, Kesharwani L. https://www.chemijournal.com/archives/2018/vol6issue2/PartAV/6-2-238-190.pdf Int J Chem Stud. 2018;6:3440–3445. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Study of cephalic index among the Tamil population. Nawaz ASK, Sreenivasan M. Med Legal Update. 2019;19:264–267. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Establishment of cephalic index using cranial parameters by computed tomography in a sampled North Indian population. Khanduri S, Malik S, Khan N, et al. Cureus. 2021;13:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Genetic differentiation and population structure in Kinnaur district, Himachal Pradesh, India. Papiha SS, Chahal SM, Roberts DF, Murty KJ, Gupta RL, Sidhu LS. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6489979/ Hum Biol. 1984;56:231–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]