Describe Your Overall Experience Using the QuickPic AAC App.

-It was easier to make topic display boards than using Boardmaker or TouchChat HD-AAC. It was faster and helpful that the app provided a starting point. -Allowed me to easily create a topic specific display. -Nice quick way to generate topic based displays. -It was easy to create a topic display based on a simple scene. Editing was simple and effective. -I enjoyed using the app- the overall learning process felt quick and I felt comfortable navigating and programming it on my own. It was much easier/quicker to program in comparison to another AAC app I have used. -Great! This updated version is much improved- sleeker with more editing capabilities. -I like the vocabulary selection feature, but wish I could preview top choices before committing to a specific choice. I felt like the prediction was generic. -Experience [GPT-3.5] was amazing! So quick and easy to use.

When Comparing [NLG-AAC] and [GPT3.5], How Do They Compare in Terms of Vocabulary Generation and Your Overall Experience?

-I thought [GPT-3.5] generated more appropriate vocabulary and a wider range of appropriate words. -[GPT-3.5] did a better job of generating vocabulary compared to [NLG]. I needed to change less with [GPT-3.5]. -[GPT-3.5] did a better job. [QuickPic AAC] picked too many irrelevant words which resulted in more time spent deleting. -[GPT-3.5] was significantly better at generating appropriate vocabulary. -[GPT-3.5] generated more appropriate topic-specific vocabulary on its own, so I didn’t need to spend as much time editing/programming the page than I did with [NLG]. -[GPT-3.5] included more usable vocabulary- it did include some higher-level vocabulary without some basics (e.g., “imagine” but not “want”). -[GPT-3.5] had more prepositions that I would use. [NLG] had more descriptors I would use, but was missing subject and objects. -[GPT-3.5] was accurate at reflecting words I would want to use. Vocabulary choice for [NLG] was random.