Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 18;25(18):10028. doi: 10.3390/ijms251810028

Table 3.

Genotype–phenotype correlation based on the presenting and follow-up IOP, corneal diameter, cup-to-disc ratio, and visual acuity in patients harboring various combinations of CEP164 variants.

Genotype Combinations in PCG Cases
(Number of Cases)
Intraocular Pressure (mmHg) Cup-to-Disc Ratio Corneal Diameter (mm) Visual Acuity (logMAR)
At Presen-tation After 3 Months After 1 Year At Presen-tation After 3 Months After 1 Year At Presen-tation After 3 Months After 1 Year At Presen-tation After 3 Months After 1 Year
Cases with unique heterozygous CEP164
alleles only (n = 9)
25.75 ± 6.63 12.86 ± 3.8 11.63 ± 1.69 0.48 ± 0.13 0.54 ± 0.22 0.46 ± 0.2 13.06 ± 0.98 12.71 ± 1.19 13.1 ± 0.74 NA NA 1.19 ± 0.47
Cases with compound heterozygous CEP164 alleles
(n = 3)
28 ±
6.93
15.33 ± 5.03 10.33 ± 2.52 NA 0.47 ± 0.23 0.5 ± 0.26 13.67 ± 0.58 13.33 ± 0.58 13.67 ± 0.29 NA NA
Cases with co-occurring CEP164 alleles along with heterozygous alleles of other genes (n = 4) 24.25 ± 6.65 NA 17.67 ± 5.86 0.83 ± 0.06 NA 0.63 ± 0.31 15 ±
2.29
NA NA NA NA 2.34 ± 0.75
* p value (Unique heterozygous CEP164 alleles versus co-occurring CEP164 and alleles of other genes) 0.72 NA 0.019 0.004 NA 0.284 0.056 NA NA NA NA 0.053
* p value (Compound heterozygous CEP164
alleles versus co-occurring CEP164 and alleles of other genes)
0.5 NA 0.117 NA NA 0.598 0.384 NA NA NA NA NA

* p value is based on Student’s t test; NA: Data are not available. Bold format represents the significant p values.