Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 20;13(18):5574. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185574

Table 2.

Descriptive data and virtual companion interaction data for the Stage 2 research sample. M—man; W—woman.

Participant Number Gender Age Cognitive Performance Score Number of Sessions Length of Session(s) (min:s) Subjective Reports
2023-1 W 83 1 3 7:32
3:39
2:07
Session 1—The participant’s voice was mistaken by the software for a language other than English.
Session 2—There was an engaging conversation about the participant’s children. The participant enjoyed how immersive the conversation was.
Session 3 –The participant gave one-word answers, so the virtual companion kept asking new questions.
2023-2 W 87 1 3 25:00
25:00
53:50
The participant had stimulating, deep, and personal conversations about traveling, teaching, poetry, and death. The participant did not believe that the virtual companion was a real person.
2023-3 W 87 3 3 20:23
29:00
32:53
The participant was very engaged, and did not understand that the virtual companion was not a real person. The participant had deep and intimate conversations about their family.
2023-4 M 93 3 3 22:39
33:53
30:46
Session 1—The participant was engaged but the conversation was “all over the place”.
Session 2—The participant was very engaged, and talked about their farm.
Session 3—This was primarily a question-and-answer conversation (with questions from the virtual companion), but the participant was engaged.
2023-5 W 92 3 1 0:32 The participant asked to take the head-mounted display off as they found it too heavy.
2023-6 W 93 1 2 29:00
34:48
The participant had very positive, lengthy conversations about their pet (Session 1) and cuisine/food (Session 2).
2023-7 W 96 2 2 2:23
9:10
Session 1—The conversation was dry, and the participant thought that the questions were “stupid”.
Session 2—The participant gave one-word answers so the software was not able to engage and respond appropriately.
2023-8 M 86 4 1 5:50 The participant answered questions but felt overwhelmed.
2023-9 W 86 2 2 0:52
0:00
Session 1—The participant had a hard time understanding the virtual companion but was willing to try a second time.
Session 2—The participant immediately asked to remove the headset.
2023-10 W 67 3 2 2:49
9:29
Session 1—The participant took the head-mounted display off but was willing to try a second time.
Session 2—The software had difficulty understanding the participant’s speech (due to stuttering) but the participant appeared to enjoy the experience.
Frequency or mean (standard deviation) 2 M
8 W
87
(8.1)
2.3
(1.1)
2.2
(0.8)
Session 1: 11:42 (11:13)
Session 2: 18:07 (14:04)
Session 3: 29:54 (21:15)