Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 29;14(9):1079. doi: 10.3390/life14091079

Table 1.

Details of P. aeruginosa strains (n = 18) isolated in a Brazilian hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Strain ID Source Patient ID Local Origin Date MALDI-TOF MS a
VITEK MS® (%) b MALDI Biotyper® (Score) c
PS001.21 Urine A ICU d-1 COVID-19 e 07/12/2021 P. aeruginosa (99.9) P. aeruginosa (2.40)
PS002.21 Urine B ICU-1 COVID-19 07/14/2021 P. aeruginosa (99.9) P. aeruginosa (2.05)
PS003.21 Tracheal secretion C ICU-1 COVID-19 07/23/2021 P. aeruginosa (84.0) P. aeruginosa (2.27)
PS005.21 Tracheal secretion D ICU-1 COVID-19 07/30/2021 P. aeruginosa (99.9) P. aeruginosa (2.03)
PS006.21 Tracheal secretion E ICU-1 COVID-19 07/28/2021 P. aeruginosa (99.9) P. aeruginosa (2.31)
PS007.21 Urine F ICU-1 COVID-19 08/06/2021 P. aeruginosa (99.9) P. aeruginosa (2.04)
PS008.21 Oral swab G ICU-1 COVID-19 08/06/2021 P. aeruginosa (95.1) P. aeruginosa (2.03)
PS010.22 Rectal swab H ICU-2 HIPCC f 01/27/2022 P. aeruginosa (99.9) P. aeruginosa (2.33)
PS011.22 Tracheal secretion I Medical Clinic g-1 Non-COVID-19 02/17/2022 P. aeruginosa (92.7) P. aeruginosa (2.00)
PS012.22 Rectal swab J ICU-2 HIPCC 02/23/2022 P. aeruginosa (99.9) P. aeruginosa (2.31)
PS013.22 Urine K ICU-2 Non-COVID-19 02/28/2022 P. aeruginosa (96.1) P. aeruginosa (2.22)
PS014.22 Urine L ICU-2 COVID-19 03/01/2022 P. aeruginosa (82.7) P. aeruginosa (2.34)
PS015.22 Tracheal secretion M ICU-1 COVID-19 02/24/2022 P. aeruginosa (91.6) P. aeruginosa (2.00)
PS016.22 Tracheal secretion N ICU-2 Non-COVID-19 03/05/2022 P. aeruginosa (92.0) P. aeruginosa (2.04)
PS017.22 Tracheal secretion O ICU-1 COVID-19 03/04/2022 P. aeruginosa (99.4) P. aeruginosa (2.26)
PS018.22 Tracheal secretion C ICU-1 COVID-19 03/09/2022 P. aeruginosa (99.9) P. aeruginosa (2.10)
PS019.22 Tracheal secretion M ICU-1 COVID-19 03/13/2022 P. aeruginosa (99.9) P. aeruginosa (2.01)
PS020.22 Urine P Medical Clinic-2 Non-COVID-19 03/17/2022 P. aeruginosa (99.9) P. aeruginosa (2.07)

a—matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry performed; b—results analyzed by SARAMIS Premium software v. 4.0.0.14, only strains with a percentage ≥ 75% similarity were considered identified; c—results analyzed by MBT Compass software. Data interpretation was done in line with Bruker’s standard criteria; a species cut-off score value of 2.0 and a genus cut-off score value of 1.7 were applied; d—intensive care unit; e—patient with co-infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; f—Hospital Infection Prevention and Control Committee; g—medical clinic.