Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 29;12(9):1789. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12091789

Table 1.

Characteristics of study population and subgroups of subfertility diagnosis.

Total Study Population
n = 227
Male Factor
n = 147
Female Factor
n = 21
Idiopathic Subfertility
n = 34
Combination *
n = 21
Age (years) a 31.64 (4.44) 31.09 (4.41) 31.61 (3.13) 34.10 (3.83) 1 31.01 (4.32)
Ethnicity b
 Caucasian 197 (86.8) 132 (89.8) 16 (76.2) 28 (82.4) 17 (81.0)
 Non-Caucasian 22 (9.7) 11 (7.5) 3 (14.3) 5 (14.7) 3 (14.3)
Body mass index (kg/m2) a 24.55 (4.47) 24.67 (4.23) 25.21 (6.33) 22.54 (3.50) 25.60 (4.53)
Use of medication b
 Yes 54 (23.8) 31 (21.1) 4 (19.0) 7 (20.6) 10 (47.6)
 No 171 (75.3) 115 (78.2) 17 (81.0) 26 (76.5) 11 (52.4)
Menstrual cycle b
 Regular 174 (76.7) 119 (81.0) 17 (81.0) 26 (76.5) 7 (33.3)
 Mostly regular 21 (9.3) 14 (9.5) 1 (4.8) 6 (17.6) 0 (0.0)
 Irregular 26 (11.5) 11 (7.5) 3 (14.3) 0 (0.0) 11 (52.4)
 Absent 2 (0.9) 1 (0.7) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (4.8)
Duration of
subfertility (years) a
2.71 (1.88) 2.51 (2.00) 3.13 (1.56) 3.48 (1.73) 2 2.42 (1.34)

Data are presented as the a mean (standard deviation) or a b number (percentage). * More than one cause for subfertility diagnosis was found. An ANOVA test with post hoc Bonferroni was performed to test differences; 1 male vs. idiopathic, p < 0.05; 2 male vs. idiopathic, p < 0.05.