Table 3.
Modern Methods | Specimen Used | Description | Invasive/Non-Invasive | Point of Care/Molecular/Other | Advantages | Disadvantages | Developed Countries | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Direct conventional PCR | Blood | With plasmodium cytochrome oxidase III gene (COX-III) as target, direct conventional PCR is conducted on bloodspot samples. Results are visualized on a gel. | Invasive | Molecular | High Sensitivity; faster than nested; does not require DNA isolation | Requires much expertise and expensive | USA | [21] |
Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) | Blood | Using different primer pairs to run 2 sequential amplification reactions. Plasmodium genomic DNA extracted from dried blood spots | Invasive | Molecular | High sensitivity and specificity | Time consuming, expensive, requires much expertise | Thailand, USA, Brazil, United Kingdom, Austria | [13,16,18,21,22,23,24,25] |
Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) | Blood, Serum | DNA extracted from blood and serum samples are analyzed using the ddPCR method, which is based on water–oil emulsion droplet technology | Invasive | Molecular | High sensitivity using blood samples | Low sensitivity using serum samples; expensive | Italy, Thailand |
[26,27] |
Photo- Induced Electron transfer PCR (PET-PCR) | Blood | Total DNA is extracted from dried blood spots and PCR performed using photo-induced electron transfer fluorogenic primers | Invasive | Molecular | High sen-sitivity for parasite identification and characterization. | Requires much expertise and is expensive | USA | [15] |
Fluoresen-ce reson-ance energy transfer (FRET) real time PCR | Blood | Real-time PCR utilizing FRET whereby fluorophores are brought in close proximity after hybridization is performed on DNA extracted from lyophilized blood samples targeting the 18S rRNA gene | Invasive | Molecular | High sensit-ivity, and allows for simultaneous quantitative and species-specific detection |
This specific protocol could not differentiate between P. vivax and P. knowlesi; expensive | United Kingdom, Austria | [22] |
SYBR Green Real-Time PCR-RFLP Assay | Blood | Real-time PCR using sybr green dye that binds to all double-stranded DNA followed by restriction fragment polymorphism to differentiate species | Invasive | Molecular | High sensitivity | Meltcurve required in PCR since Sybr green alone can be non-specific; expensive | Sweden | [28] |
Hair qPCR | Head hairs | Hairs without roots are taken from patients and qPCR assay conducted | Non-invasive | molecular | Requires no special trans-port/storage conditions for samples | Sensitivity lower than when blood samples are used | Spain | [29] |
Insulated Isothermal PCR (iiPCR) | Blood | PCR is performed in a portable device using an assay based on the Rayleigh–Bénard convection method | Invasive | Molecular/point of care | Portable, easy and fast operation; direct interpretation | Not as sensitive as qPCR | Malaysia | [30] |
Lab Chip Real Time PCR (LRP) | Blood | DNA is extracted from collected blood samples and a portable LRP device is used to detect malarial parasites based on lab-on-chip technology | Invasive | Molecular/point of care | High sensitivity and specificity. Fast and cost effective | Risk of false negatives higher than traditional real-time PCR | Korea | [31] |
Pv-mt Cox PCR | Blood | DNA is extracted from collected blood samples and qPCR with mitochondrial gene target is carried out | Invasive | Molecular | More sensitive in the detection of P. vivax | Expensive | Brazil | [32] |
PvLAP5 and Pvs25qRT-PCR assays | Blood | Extracted RNA is subjected to quantitative reverse transcription PCR | Invasive | Molecular | Suitable assay for the determination of human transmission reservoir | Expensive | Panama | [33] |
Other Quantita-tive PCR (qPCR) | Blood | Real-time PCR performed using primers targeting different regions and SYBR green or probe-based technology on DNA extracted from whole blood | Invasive | Molecular | High sensitivity and rapid | Extreme caution needed to prevent contamination; expensive | France, Canada, USA Columbia Germany, Brazil, China, Malaysia |
[34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44] |
Dry LAMP system (CZC-LAMP) | Blood | Blood samples are analyzed directly without extraction using the assay made up of dried reagents | Invasive | Point of care/molecular | High sensitivity and specificity; no need for prior extraction | Not widely available | [45] | |
Particle Diffusometry (PD)-LAMP | Blood | PD, which senses images, is combined with LAMP on a smartphone-enabled device to detect low levels of parasitemia | Invasive | Point of care/molecular | Sensitivitities higher than RDTs and similar to qPCR |
Sensitivity slightly lower than nested PCR | USA | [46] |
LAMP and MinION™ nanopore sequencer | Blood | Primers targeting the 18S–rRNA gene of all five human Plasmodium species are generated and samples subjected to LAMP. Min-ION™ nanopore sequencer is used on amplicons to identify Plasmodium spp. | Invasive | Molecular | Highly sensitive, and simple | Expensive | Japan | [47] |
Other Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), | Blood | Extracted DNA is subjected to loop-mediated isothermal amplification with a variety of detection methods | Invasive | Point of care/molecular | Simple, low cost; can be used in resource-limited settings and point-of-care settings | Some cannot quantify par-asite density; some are insensitive towards low parasitemia and mixed infections | France, Korea, Thailand Italy, Brazil Spain, Mala-ysia, Japan, Peru, USA |
[26,34,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63] |