Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 27;15:483. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-01355-9

Table 3.

Evaluation of the performance of the four models in the internal validation set

AUC(95%CI) Accuracy(95%CI) Sensitivity(95%CI) Specificity(95%CI) F1 Score(95%CI)
KNN Training set 0.948 (0.914–0.983) 0.944 (0.941–0.947) 0.963 (0.952–0.975) 0.889 (0.878–0.899) 0.779 (0.761–0.798)
Validation set 0.796 (0.637–0.949) 0.932 (0.922–0.942) 0.674 (0.565–0.783) 0.898 (0.868–0.928) 0.646 (0.564–0.727)
XGBoost Training set 0.976 (0.960–0.992) 0.943 (0.934–0.951) 0.913 (0.904–0.921) 0.946 (0.937–0.954) 0.716 (0.690–0.742)
Validation set 0.906 (0.830–0.979) 0.903 (0.886–0.921) 0.922 (0.882–0.961) 0.828 (0.775–0.880) 0.569 (0.459–0.678)
RF Training set 0.880 (0.818–0.941) 0.818 (0.783–0.854) 0.826 (0.785–0.868) 0.815 (0.775–0.854) 0.417 (0.377–0.457)
Validation set 0.842 (0.723–0.959) 0.808 (0.772–0.844) 0.804 (0.731–0.877) 0.822 (0.775–0.869) 0.393 (0.352–0.433)
SVM Training set 0.959 (0.933–0.985) 0.872 (0.816–0.928) 0.916 (0.858–0.973) 0.864 (0.797–0.931) 0.591 (0.468–0.715)
Validation set 0.851 (0.730–0.970) 0.833 (0.792–0.874) 0.849 (0.754–0.945) 0.813 (0.764–0.863) 0.445 (0.356–0.535)

CI, confidence interval; KNN, k-nearest neighbor; XGBoost, extreme gradient boosting; RF, random forest; SVM, support vector machine; AUC, area under the curve