Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD004425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004425.pub6

Comparison 1. LNG 100 µg / EE 20 µg versus placebo.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Mean change in total lesion count 2 572 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐9.98 [‐16.51, ‐3.45]
2 Mean change in inflammatory lesion count 2 572 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐2.95 [‐4.97, ‐0.93]
3 Mean change in non‐inflammatory lesion count 2 572 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐6.75 [‐12.56, ‐0.94]
4 Clinician assessment of women with clear or almost clear lesions at cycle 6 2 571 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.56 [1.13, 2.18]
5 Participant self‐assessment of acne lesion improvement 2 572 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.13 [1.47, 3.09]
6 Discontinuation due to non‐acne adverse event 1 350 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.54 [0.55, 4.31]
7 Discontinuation due to lack of acne improvement 1 350 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.88 [0.31, 2.47]