Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 22;16(9):1498. doi: 10.3390/v16091498

Table 7.

Meta-analysis of the prevalence of Oropouche Virus isolates among subjects from the general population (i.e., without documented signs/symptoms of ongoing arbovirus infection).

Testing No. of Series No. of Observations No. of Events Detection Rate (%, 95%CI) I2 (95%CI) Tau2 Q p-Value
Serology, IgG
Overall 8 3344 1083 24.45 (7.83 to 55.21) 97.6% (96.5 to 98.3) 3.548 287.63 <0.001
ELISA 2 1616 338 59.82 (22.71 to 88.29) 99.5% 1.357 198.31
ELISA (on HAT) 5 1523 635 29.31 (21.91 to 37.99) 92.6% 0.176 54.26
ICT 1 205 0 0.0 (0.00 to 100) - - -
Serology, IgM/IgG
Overall 4 753 12 1.42 (0.61 to 3.28) 41.9% (0.0 to 80.5) 0.251 5.17 0.160
HAT 1 0.67 (0.17 to 2.64) - - -
PRT 3 2.16 (0.99 to 4.68) 6.2% 0.018 2.13

Note: I2 = percent proportion of variance in study estimates that is due to heterogeneity; tau2 = estimate of variance of underlying distribution of true effect sizes; Q = weighted sum of squared differences between individual study effects and pooled effect across studies; 95%CI = 95% confidence interval; RT-qPCR = real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction; ICT = immunochromatography; ELISA = enzyme-linked immune assay; HAT = hemagglutination test; PRT = plaque reduction neutralization test.